Cited Articles

Cited Articles

Instances where the Energy Law Journal has been cited in opinions and other published legal materials

U.S. Supreme Court

  • General Motors Corp. v. Tracy, 519 U.S. 278, 117 S.Ct. 811, 136 L.Ed.2d 761 (1997) (citing Mogel & Gregg, Appropriateness of Imposing Common Carrier Status on Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, 4 Energy L.J. 155 (1983)).  
  • Morgan Stanley v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1, 554 U.S.527, 128 S. Ct. 2733, 2741 (2008), (citing Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147, 147 (2007)).

Federal Courts & Agencies

  • AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC v. Smith, 470 F.Supp.2d 586, 596, 165 Oil & Gas Rep. 287, 287, Util. L. Rep. P 14,634, 14634 (D.Md. Jan 23, 2007) (NO. CIV.A.RDB 06 2478) (citing Jacob Dweck, David Wochner, and Michael Brooks, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006)).
  • AIU Ins. Co. v. Superintendent, 1991 Me. Super. Lexis 5 (Super. Ct. M.E. 1991) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and 'Takings', 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989)) Note: only published in LexisNexis.
  • Alliance for Clean Coal v. Miller, 44 F.3d 591 (7th Cir.(Ill.) 1995) (citing G. William Stafford, Electric Wholesale Power Sales at Market-Based Rates, 12 Energy L.J. 291 (1991); Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is this Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994)).    
  • Association of Oil Pipe Lines v. FERC, 83 F.3d 1424 (D.C.Cir. 1996) (citing Steven Reed & Pantelis Michalopoulos, Oil Pipeline Regulatory Reform:  Still in the Labyrinth?, 16 Energy L.J. 65 (1995)).
  • Automated Power Exchange, Inc. v. FERC, 204 F.3d 1144 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling:  Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994)).
  • Brazos Elec. Power Co-op., Inc. v. FERC, 205 F.3d 235 (5th Cir. 2000) (citing Richard Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995)).
  • Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Wright, 707 F.Supp.2d 1169 (D. Kan. 2010) (citing Jim Behnke, Safety Jurisdiction over Natural Gas Pipelines, 19 Energy L.J. 71 (1998)).
  • Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. FERC, 823 F.2d 630 (D.C.Cir. 1987) (citing Griggs, Restructuring the Natural Gas Industry: Order No. 436 and Other Regulatory Initiatives, 7 Energy L.J. 71 (1986)).
  • Farmers Union Cent. Exchange, Inc. v. FERC, 734 F.2d 1486 (D.C.Cir. 1984) (citing Report of the Committee on Oil Pipeline Regulation, 4 Energy L.J. 143 (1983); Navarro & Stauffer, The Legal History and Economic Implications of Oil Pipeline Regulation, 2 Energy L.J. 291 (1981); Coburn, The Case for Petroleum Pipeline Deregulation, 3 Energy L.J. 225 (1982)).
  • Finestone v. Florida Power and Light Co., 2008 WL 863894 (11th Cir. 2008) (citing Jason Bjorn Aamodt, Comment, Regulating the Standard of Care Owed to the Public During an Emergency at a Nuclear Power Plant, 16 Energy L.J. 181, 184-89 (1995))
  • General Motors Corp. v. Tracy, 519 U.S. 278, 117 S.Ct. 811, 136 L.Ed.2d 761 (U.S.Ohio, 1997) (citing Mogel & Gregg, Appropriateness of Imposing Common Carrier Status on Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, 4 Energy L.J. 155 (1983)).  
  • Idaho Power Co. v. FERC, 312 F.3d 454 (D.C.Cir. 2002) (citing Report of the Committee on Electric Utility Regulation, 18 Energy L.J. 197, 200 (1997); Andrew S. Katz, Using the EEI-NEM Master Contract to Manage Power Marketing Risks, 21 Energy L.J. 269 (2000)).
  • Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. F.C.C., 988 F.2d 1254, (D.C.Cir. 1993) (citing W. Whittaker, The Discounted Cash Flow Methodology: Its Use in Estimating a Utility's Cost of Equity, 12 Energy L.J. 265 (1991)).
  • Illinois Commerce Commission v. F.E.R.C., 576 F.3d 470 (7th Cir. 2009) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Regional Transmission Organizations: Federal Limitations Needed for Tort Liability, 23 Energy L.J. 63 (2002)).
  • Illinois Commerce Com'n v. FERC, 576 F.3d 470 (7th Cir. 2009) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Regional Transmission Organizations: Federal Limitations Needed for Tort Liability, 23 Energy L.J. 63, 64 (2002))
  • In re Public Serv. Co. of N.H., 108 B.R. 854 (Bankr. D. N.H. 1989) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and 'Takings', 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989)).
  • In re Public Serv. Co. of N.H., 114 B.R. 820 (Bankr. D. N.H. 1990) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and 'Takings', 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989)).
  • Interstate Natural Gas Ass'n of America v. FERC,  285 F.3d 18  (D.C.Cir. 2002) (citing Paul Mohler, Experiments at the FERC--In Search of a Hypothesis, 19 Energy L.J. 281, 300 (1998)).
  • Isla Petroleum Corp. v. Department of Consumer Affairs, 640 F.Supp. 474 (D.Puerto Rico 1986) (citing E. O'Donnell & L. Glassman, Energy Emergencies: Constitutional Constraints on State Efforts to Control Oil Supplies and Prices, 5 Energy L.J. 77 (1984)).
  • K N Gas Supply Services, Inc. v.  American Production Partnership-V, Ltd ., 994 F.Supp. 1283  (D.Colo. 1998) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Kansas Power and Light Co. v. FERC, 851 F.2d 1479 (D.C.Cir. 1988) (citing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry From Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Kentucky West Virginia Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Com'n, 837 F.2d 600 (3d Cir.(Pa.) 1988) (citing Hobelman, The Narragansett Decision and Its Aftermath, 6 Energy L.J. 33 (1985)).
  • Louisiana Energy and Power Authority v. FERC, 141 F.3d 364 (D.C.Cir. 1998) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Antitrust Policy in the New Electricity Industry, 17 Energy L.J. 29 (1996)).
  • Maine Public Utilities Commission v. F.E.R.C., 520 F.3d 464 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (citing Carmen L. Gentile, The Mobile-Sierra Rule: Its Illustrious Past and Uncertain Future, 21 Energy L.J. 353 (2000)).
  • Maine Public Utilities Comm'n v. FERC, 454 F.3d 278, 284, 372 U.S.App. D.C. 82, Util. L. Rep. P 14,602, 14602 (D.C. Cir. Jun 30, 2006) (No. 05-1001) (citing David G. Tewksbury & Stephanie S. Lim, Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts, 26 Energy L.J. 437 (2005)).
  • Maine Public Utilities Commission v. F.E.R.C., 520 F.3d 464 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (citing Carmen L. Gentile, The Mobile-Sierra Rule: Its Illustrious Past and Uncertain Future, 21 Energy L.J. 353 (2000)).
  • Maine Public Utilities Com'n v. FERC.  520 F.3d 464 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (citing David G. Tewksbury & Stephanie S. Lim, Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts, 26 Energy L.J. 437, 439-447 (2005)).
  • Maryland People's Counsel v. FERC, 761 F.2d 780 (D.C.Cir., 1985) (citing Means & Angyal, The Regulation and Future Role of Direct Producer Sales, 5 Energy L.J. 1 (1984)).
  • Michigan Electric Transmission Co. v. Midland Cogeneration Venture, Ltd., 737 F. Supp. 2d 715 (E.D. Mich. 2010) (citing Jackie S. Levinson & Andrew D. Schifrin, Regulatory & Tax Treatment of Electric Interconnection Facilities, 23 Energy L.J. 459 (2002)).
  • Mobil Oil Exploration and Producing Southeast, Inc. v. FERC, 885 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1989) (citing Shoneman & McConnell, F.E.R.C. Order No. 451: Freedom (Almost) for Old Gas, 7 Energy L.J. 299 (1986); Mogel & Gregg, Appropriateness of Imposing Common Carrier Status on Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, 4 Energy L.J. 155 (1983)).
  • Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1, 554 U.S.527, 128 S. Ct. 2733, 2741 (2008) (citing Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L. J. 147, 147 (2007)).
  • Mustang Energy Corp. v. FERC, 859 F.2d 1447 (10th Cir. 1988) (citing Griggs, Restructuring the Natural Gas Industry:  Order No. 436 and Other Regulatory Initiatives, 7 Energy L.J. 71 (1986)).
  • Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Approximately 9117.53 acres in Pratt, Kingman, and Reno Counties, Kan., No. 10–1232–MLB, 2012 WL 859728 (D. Kan. Mar. 13, 2012) (citing Citing: J. Behnke and H. Dondis, The Sage Approach to Immediate Entry by Private Entities Exercising Federal Eminent Domain Authority under the Natural Gas Act and the Federal Power Act, 27 Energy L.J. 499 (2006)).
  • Public Utility Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish County Washington v. FERC, 471 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 2006) (citing Carmen L. Gentile, The Mobile-Sierra Rule: Its Illustrious Past and Uncertain Future, 21 Energy L.J.  353, 373 (2000); Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best To Respond to the “Perfect Storm,” 22 Energy L.J.  65, 65-84 (2001)).
  • Sea Robin Pipeline Co. v. FERC, 127 F.3d 365 (5th Cir. 1997) (citing Angela S. Chitwood-Beehler, A Conflict in the Circuits: The FERC's Jurisdiction Over Gathering Rates, 13 Energy L.J. 375 (1992)).
  • Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 998 F. Supp. 946 (N.D.Ill.1998) (citing Stokes, The Limit of Government's Regulatory Authority Over Non-Adjacent Wetlands: Hoffman Homes, Inc. v. EPA, 15 Energy L.J. 137 (1994)).
  • South Coast Air Quality Management District v. F.E.R.C., 621 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing James J. Hoecker, The NEPA Mandate and Federal Regulation of the Natural Gas Industry, 13 Energy L.J. 265 (1992)).
  • Standardization of Generator Interconnection Agreements and Procedures, Order No. 2003, 2001 - 2005 FERC Stats. & Regs., Regs. Preambles ¶ 31,146 (2003) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Regional Transmission Organizations: Federal Limitations Needed for Tort Liability, 23 Energy L.J. 63 (2002)).
  • Statement of Administrative Policy on Separations of Functions, 101 F.E.R.C. ¶ 61,340 (2002) (citing Stephen R. Melton, Separation of Functions at the FERC: Does the Reorganization of the Office of General Counsel Mean What It Says?, 5 Energy L.J. 349 (1984)).
  • Tennessee ex rel. City of Cookeville, Tenn. v. Upper Cumberland Elec. Membership Corp .,  256 F. Supp. 2d 754  (M.D.Tenn., 2003) (citing The Rural Electrification Act Preempts State Condemnation Law: City of Morgan City v. South Louisiana Electric Cooperative Ass'n, 16 Energy L.J. 489 (1995)).
  • United Distribution Companies v. FERC, 88 F.3d 1105 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Williams Natural Gas Co. v. FERC, 943 F.2d 1320 (D.C.Cir. 1991) (citing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988);  Williams, The Proposed Sea-Change in Natural Gas Regulation, 6 Energy L.J. 233 (1985)).

State Courts & Agencies

  • Armstrong Petroleum Corp. v. Tri-Valley Oil & Gas Co., 11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 412 (2004) (citing Mickey S. Moon, Assigning Gas Balancing Rights in the Absence of a Gas Balancing Agreement,14 Energy L.J. 407 (1993))
  • Chugach Electric Ass'n, Inc. v. Regulatory Com'n of Alaska, 49 P.3d 246 (Alaska 2002) (citing Harvey L. Reiter, Competition Between Public and Private Distributors In a Restructured Power Industry, 19 Energy L.J. 333 (1998)).
  • City of Boulder v. Colorado Pub. Utilities Comm'n, 996 P.2d 1270 (Colo. 2000) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995)).
  • City of Saint Paul v. Northern States Power Co., 462 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. 1990) (citing Pierce, Reconstructing the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility Control, 2002 WL 31000014 (Conn. Super. 2002) (citing A. Gupta, Tracking Stranded Costs, 21 Energy L.J. 113 (2000)).
  • Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility Control,830 A.2d 1121 (Conn. 2003) (citing A. Gupta, Tracking Stranded Costs, 21 Energy L.J. 113 (2000)).
  • Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Public Utility Com'n of Texas, 841 S.W.2d 459 (Tex.App.-Austin 1992) (citing Clinton A. Vince & John S. Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation in a Post-Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989); Lindh, Federal Preemption of State Regulation in the Field of Electricity and Natural Gas: A Supreme Court Chronicle, 10 Energy L.J. 277 (1989)).
  • Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. City of Tacoma, 2010 WL 4290648, 158 Wash.App. 1022 (Wash. App. Div. 1 Nov. 01, 2010) (NO. 64247-2-I) (citing Tyler Harden, Limiting Tribal Rights Under the Federal Power Act: Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States, 28 Energy L.J. 667 (2007)).
  • In re Application of Delmarva Power & Light Co. for an Increase in its Electric Base Rates & from Certain Revisions to its Electric Service Rules and Regulations, Docket No. 91-20, 1992 Del. PSC LEXIS 15 (1992) (citing W. Whittaker, The Discounted Cash Flow Methodology: Its Use in Estimating a Utility's Cost of Equity, 12 Energy L.J. 265 (1991)).
  • In re Application of the Union Light, Heat & Power Co. for Certain Findings Under 15 U.S.C. §  79Z, Docket No. 2001-058, 2001 Ky. PUC LEXIS 624 (2001) (citing Andrew Katz, Using the EEI-NEM Master Contract to Manage Power Marketing Risks, 21 Energy L.J. 269 (2000)).
  • In re Application of Wash. Gas & Light Co. for Authority to Increase Existing Rates and Charges for Gas Service, 229 P.U.R. 4th 177 (2003) (citing Mark Newton Lowry & Lawrence Kaufman, Performance-Based Regulation of Utilities, 23 Energy L.J. 399 (2002)).
  • In re Consideration of Standards for Integrated Resource Planning and Investments in Conservation & Demand Mgmt. for Natural Gas Utilities, 1994 Va. PUC LEXIS 158 (1994) (citing Donald F. Santa, Jr. & Patricia J. Beneke, Federal Natural Gas Policy and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, 14 Energy L.J. 1, 44–45 (1993)).
  • In re Harper, 223 A.D.2d 200 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996) (citing Frank R. Lindh, Federal Pre-emption Versus State Utility Regulation in a Post-Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1-79 (1989)). Note: this case deals with plagiarism by a law student using an ELJ article.
  • In Re Washington Gas Light Co., Dist. of Columbia Div., 229 P.U.R. 4th 177, 387, (D.C. P.S.C. Nov. 10, 2003) (citing Mark Newton Lowry & Lawrence Kaufmann, Performance-Based Regulation of Utilities, 23 Energy L.J. 399 (2002)).
  • La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 09-0148, Mr. Frederick D. Heck (2010) (citing Jon Wellinghoff, James Pederson & David L. Morenoff, Facilitating Hydrokinetic Energy Development Through Regulatory Innovation, 29 Energy L.J. 397 (2008)).
  •  
  • Leggett v. Duke Energy Corp., 308 S.W.3d 843 (Tenn. 2010) (citing Frank R. Lindh, Federal Preemption of State Regulation in the Field of Electricity and Natural Gas: A Supreme Court Chronicle, 10 Energy L.J. 277 (1989)).
  • National-Southwire Aluminum Co. v. Big Rivers Elec. Corp., 785 S.W.2d 503 (Ct. App. Ky. 1990) (citing Hoecker, "Used and Useful": Autopsy of a Ratemaking Policy, 8 Energy L.J. 303 (1987)).
  • Office of the Attorney Gen. of the State of Cal., 81 Op. Atty Gen. Cal. 1, 1998 Cal. AG LEXIS 14 (1998) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988); J. Michaels & Arthur S. DeVany, Market-Based Rates for Interstate Gas Pipelines: The Relevant Market and the Real Market, 16 Energy L.J. 299 (1995)).
  • Penn. Pub. Util. Comm’n v. Penn. Power & Light Co., Docket Nos. R 00943271 and R00943271C001 – 0145, 1995 Pa. PUC LEXIS 190 (1995) (citing W. Whittaker, The Discounted Cash Flow Methodology:  Its Use in Estimating a Utility's Cost of Equity, 12 Energy L.J. 265 (1991)).
  • Petition of Indiana-American Water Co., 150 P.U.R. 4th 141 (1994) (citing W. Whittaker, The Discounted Cash Flow Methodology: Its Use in Estimating a Utility's Cost of Equity, 12 Energy L.J. 265 (1991)).
  • QWEST Communications Corp. v. MCIMetro Access Transmission Services, LLC, No. 08F-259T, R09-0248-I (Colo. P.U.C. Mar. 6, 2009) (citing Kiplyn R. Farmer, Note, FERC Waiver of Filed Rate Doctrine: Some Suggested Principles, 9 Energy L.J. 497 (1988)).
  • In Re Regulation of Local Distribution Cos., 163 P.U.R. 4th 210 (1995) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Southern Union Co. v. Department of Public Utilities, 941 N.E.2d 633 (Mass. 2011) (citing Mark Newton Lowry & Lawrence Kaufmann, Performance–Based Regulation of Utilities, 23 Energy L.J. 399 (2002)).
  • State ex rel. Utilities Com'n v. Carolina Power & Light Co., 359 N.C. 516, 614 S.E.2d 281 (2005) (citing William H. Penniman & Paul B. Turner, A Jurisdictional Clash Over Electricity Transmission: Northern States Power v. FERC, 20 Energy L.J. 205, 207-10 (1999)).
  • T&F Operating, Inc., Docket No. 00-722-G-PC, 2002 W. Va. PUC LEXIS 2138 (2002) (citing Jim Behnke, Safety Jurisdiction over Natural Gas Pipelines, 19 Energy L.J. 71 (1998)).
  • TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Finkelstein, 933 S.W.2d 591 (Tex.App.-San Antonio, 1996) (citing Jerome C. Muys et al., Report of the Committee on Public Lands, 15 Energy L.J. 219 (1994)).
  • U.S. Steel Min. Co., LLC v. Helton, 219 W.Va. 1, 631 S.E.2d 559 (2005) (citing John S. Lowe, Severance Taxes as an Issue of Energy Sectionalism, 5 Energy L.J. 357, 360-61 (1984)).
  • U.S. West Communications, Inc. v. City of Longmont, 948 P.2d 509 (Colo. 1997) (citing Kiplyn R. Farmer, Note, FERC Waiver of the Filed Rate Doctrine:  Some Suggested Principles, 9 Energy L.J. 497 (1988)).
  • Zimmerman v. Board of Commissioners of Wabaunsee County, 264 P.3d 332 (Kan. 2011) (citing Nicholas W. Fels & Frank R. Lindh, Lessons from the California “Apocalypse:” Jurisdiction over Electric Utilities, 22 Energy L.J. 1 (2001)).

International Citations

  • Belgian Electricity & Gas Commission (CREG), The Level and Evolution of Energy Prices, Report No. F120131-CDC-1134 (Jan. 31, 2012) (citing Anatole Boute, Challenging the Re-Regulation of Liberalized Electricity Prices Under Investment Arbitration, 32 Energy L.J. 497 (2011)).

Law Review, Treaties & Journals

  • Jason Aamodt, Symposium, Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials: Human Health & Regulation, 33 Tulsa L.J. 847 (1998) (citing Aamodt, Comment, Regulating the Standard of Care Owed to the Public During an Emergency at a Nuclear Power Plant, 16 Energy L.J. 181 (1995)).
  • Inessa Abayev, Hydraulic Fracturing Wastewater: Making the Case for Treating the Environmentally Condemned, 24 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 275 (2013) (citing Lynn Kerr McKay, Ralph H. Johnson & Laurie Alberts Salita, Science and the Reasonable Development, 32 Energy L.J. 125 (2011)).
  • Katherine A. Abend, Avoiding Water-Intensive Energy Production: How to Keep the Water Running and the Lights On, 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11020 (2011) (citing Benjamin K. Sovacool, Running on Empty: The Electricity-Water Nexus and the U.S. Electric Utility Sector,30 Energy L.J. 11 (2009)).
  • Shirley S. Abrahamson, Susan M. Fieber & Gabrielle Lessard, Judges on Judging: A Bibliography, 24 St. Mary's L.J. 995 (1993) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, Comment, Shedding Light on Dequesne, 12 Energy L.J. 259 (1991)).   
  • Rosa M. Abrantes-Metz et. al., Revolution in Manipulation Law: The New Cftc Rules and the Urgent Need for Economic and Empirical Analyses, 15 U. Pa. J. Bus. L. 357 (2013) (citing Craig Pirrong, Energy Market Manipulation: Definition, Diagnosis, and Deterrence, 31 Energy L.J. 1 (2010)).
  • Nathaniel K. Adams, Comment, Take-Or-Pay: The D.C. Circuit Forces the FERC's Hand, 23 Land & Water L. Rev. 149 (1988) (citing Shoneman & McConnell, FERC Order 451: Freedom (Almost) for Old Gas, 7 Energy L.J. 299 (1986)).
  • Alan J. Alexander, The Texas Wind Estate: Wind as a Natural Resource and a Severable Property Interest, 44 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 429 (2011) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • Brent Allen, Consumers Versus Contracts: Morgan Stanley, Maine, and the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine, 1 San Diego J. Climate & Energy L. 315 (2009) (citing Carmen L. Gentile, The Mobile-Sierra Rule: Its Illustrious Past and Uncertain Future, 21 Energy L.J. 353 (2000)).
  • 198 A.L.R. Fed. 147 (2004), Preemption Issues Under Atomic Energy Act of 1954, secs. 1 et seq., 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2011, et seq. (citing Seth A. Rice, Note, Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Pataki, 24 Energy L.J. 107 (2003)).
  • Louis Altman & Malla Pollack, Callmann on Unfair Compet., TMs, & Monopolies § 4:14, Exemptions from the Antitrust Laws-Electric Energy (2011) (citing Joseph T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, and the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1 (2005)).
  • Am. Jur. 2d Energy and Power Sources § 48, Coal (2011) (citing Leslie R. Dubois, Curiosity and Carbon:  Examining the Future of Carbon Sequestration and the Accompanying Jurisdictional Issues as Outlined in the Indian Energy Title of the 2005 Energy Policy Act, 27 Energy L.J. 603 (2006).
  • 15 Am. Jur. 2d Proof of Facts § 125, Wrongful Termination of Electric Service (2008) (citing John S. Moot, Economic Theories of Regulation and Electricity Restructuring, 25 Energy L.J. 273 (2004)).
  • 27A Am. Jur. 2d Energy and Power Sources § 50, Hydrogen (2008) (citing Russell Moy, Tort Law Considerations for the Hydrogen Economy, 24 Energy L.J. 349 (2003) ).
  • 27A Am. Jur. 2d Energy and Power Sources § 151, Effect of Contrary Contract Provision (2008) (citing Ren Orans, C.K. Woo & William Clayton, Benchmarking the Price Reasonableness of the Long-Term Electricity Contract, 25 Energy L.J. 357 (2004)).
  • 27A Am. Jur. 2d Energy and Power Sources § 53, Wind Energy (2008) (citing Darrell Blakeway & Carol Brotman White, Tapping the Power of Wind: FERC Initiatives to Facilitate Transmission of Wind Power, 26 Energy L.J. 393 (2005)).
  • 27A Am. Jur. 2d Energy and Power Sources § 146, Public Utility Regulatory Policy Act (2008) (citing Michael D. Hornstein & J.S. Gebhart Stoermer, The Energy Policy Act of 2005: PURPA Reform, the Amendments and their Implications, 27 Energy L.J. 25 (2006)).
  • 27A Am. Jur. 2d Energy and Power Sources § 165, Right of Eminent Domain or to Acquire Property (2008) (citing Jim Behnke & Harold Dondis, The Sage Approach to Immediate Entry by Private Entities Exercising Federal Eminent Domain Authority Under the Natural Gas Act and the Federal Power Act, 27 Energy L.J. 499 (2006)).
  • 27A Am. Jur. 2d Energy and Power Sources § 50, Hydrogen (2008) (citing Peter M. Crofton, Emerging Issues Relating to the Burgeoning Hydrogen Economy, 27 Energy L.J. 39 (2006)).
  • 24 Am. Jur. 2d Proof of Facts § 71, Proper Purpose for Shareholder's Inspection of Corporate Books and Records (2008) (citing Jonathan D. Schneider, The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Fall of Enron, 25 Energy L.J. 441 (2004)).
  • 15 Am. Jur. 2d Proof of Facts § 125, Wrongful Termination of Electric Service (2008) (citing Jonathan D. Schneider, The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Fall of Enron, 25 Energy L.J. 441 (2004).
  • 19 Am. Jur. 2d Proof of Facts § 75, Dam Failure as Result of Negligent Design or Maintenance (2008) (citing Jeremy Ward, Note, If It’s Worth a Dam, It’s “Navigable Waters”: A Proposed Revision of Section 3(8) of the FPA Derived from Decisions Followed in FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC v. FERC, 26 Energy L.J. 179 (2005)).
  • 17 Am. Jur. 2d Proof of Facts § 133, Failure to Manage Dam or Reservoir to Prevent Flooding (2008) (citing Jeremy Ward, Note, If It’s Worth a Dam, It’s “Navigable Waters”: A Proposed Revision of Section 3(8) of the FPA Derived from Decisions Followed in FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC v. FERC, 26 Energy L.J. 179 (2005)).
  • 9 Am. Jur. 2d Proof of Facts § 261, Controlling Stockholder's Breach of Duty to Investigate Motive and Intent of Purchaser Before Selling Stock (2008) (citing Jonathan D. Schneider, The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Fall of Enron, 25 Energy L.J. 441 (2004)).
  • 29 Am. Jur. 3d Proof of Facts § 133, Liability of a Director to a Corporation for Mismanagement (2008) (citing Jonathan D. Schneider, The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Fall of Enron, 25 Energy L.J. 441 (2004)).
  • 62 Am. Jur. Trials § 395, Defending the Legal Malpractice Claim Arising from Representation of Small Business (2008) (citing Jonathan D. Schneider, The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Fall of Enron, 25 Energy L.J. 441 (2004)).
  • 83 Am. Jur. Trials § 119, Ex Parte Attachment of Parent Corporation's Treasury Stock (2008) (citing Jonathan D. Schneider, The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Fall of Enron, 25 Energy L.J. 441 (2004)).
  • S. Rheagan Alexander, Tribal Consultation for Large-Scale Projects: The National Historic Preservation Act and Regulatory Review, 32 Pace L. Rev. 895 (2012) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • Alfred C. Aman Jr., Symposium, Privatization and the Democracy Problem in Globalization: Making Markets More Accountable Through Administrative Law, 28 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1477  (2001) (citing John Burrit McArthur, Antitrust in the New Deregulated Natural Gas Industry, 18 Energy L.J. 1 (1997)).
  • Alfred C.Aman, Jr., Administrative Equity: An Analysis of Exceptions to Administrative Rules, 1982 Duke L.J. 277 (1982) (citing Noland & Penniman, The FERC Adjustments Process Under Section 502(c) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, 1 Energy L.J. 79 (1980)).
  • American Bar Association and Canadian Bar Association, Settlement of International Disputes Between Canada and the USA, 35 Can.-U.S. L.J. 9 (2011) (citing Alastair R. Lucas, Canada's Role in the United State's Oil and Gas Supply Security: Oil Sands, Arctic Gas, NAFTA, and Canadian Kyoto Protocol Impacts, 25 Energy L.J. (2004)).
  • Adell Louise Amos, Hydropower Reform and the Impact of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 on the Klamath Basin: Renewed Optimism or Same Old Song?, 22 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 1 (2007) (citing Leslie R. Dubois, Comment, Curiosity and Carbon: Examining the Future of Carbon Sequestration and the Accompanying Jurisdictional Issues as Outlined in the Indian Energy Title of the 2005 Energy Policy Act, 27 Energy L.J. 603 (2006); Joseph Barwick, Agency Conditions on the Relicensing of Hydropower Projects on Federal Reservations, 19 Energy L.J. 397 (1998)).
  • Owen L. Anderson, Geologic CO2 Sequestration: Who Owns the Pore Space?, 9 Wyo. L. Rev. 97 (2009) (citing Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008)).
  • Jennifer R. Andriano, The Power of Wind: Current Legal Issues in Siting for Wind Power, 61 Planning & Environmental Law No. 5 (2009) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • Maria Angelica, Note, The Colombian Royalty System: How Flexibility in Law-Making Generates Investment, 9 L. & B. R ev. A m. 189 (2003) (citing Jay G. Martin, Venezuela as an Opportunity for Investment in the Petroleum Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 325 (1999) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191, 196 (1996)).
  • 57 Antitrust L.J. 723 (1989), Panel Discussion  Exclusionary Conduct (citing Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facilities Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987); Mahinka & Johnson, New Antitrust Issues in a Deregulated Environment: Access to Pipelines, 4 Energy L.J. 211 (1983)).
  • Alex Arensberg, Are Migratory Birds Extending Environmental Criminal Liability?, 38 Ecology L.Q. 427 (2011) (citing John Arnold McKinsey, Regulating Avian Impacts Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Other Laws: The Wind Industry Collides with One of its Own, the Environmental Protection Movement, 28 Energy L.J. 71 (2007)).
  • Jennifer Arlen, The Failure of the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines, 66 U. Miami L. Rev. 321 (2012) (citing John S. Moot, Compliance Programs, Penalty Mitigation, and the FERC, 29 Energy L.J. 547 (2008)).
  • Patrick McGinley, Collateral Damage: Turning A Blind Eye to Environmental and Social Injustice in the Coalfields, 19 J. Envtl. & Sustainability L. 305 (2013) (citing Robert R. Nordhaus, Modernizing The Clean Air Act: Is There Life After 40?, 33 ENERGY L.J. 365 (2012)).
  • Sara Arfmann, Chapter 596: Solar-Use Easements-Let the Sunshine in, 43 McGeorge L. Rev. 683 (2012) (citing Committee Report, Report of the Renewable Energy and Demand-Side Management Committee, 30 Energy L.J. 273 (2009)).
  • Jonathan Armiger, Note, Judicial Review of Public Utility Commissions, 86 Ind. L.J. 1163 (2011) (citing Robert L. Bradley, The Origins of Political Electricity: Market Failure or Political Opportunism?, 17 Energy L.J. 59 (1996)).
  • Andrew Askland, Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: American Exceptionalism and the Transition to A Renewable Energy Future, 27 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 105 (2013) (citing Johusa P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008)).
  • Sumudu Atapattu, Global Climate Change: Can Human Rights (and Human Beings) Survive This Onslaught?, 20 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 35 (2008) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • Donna M. Attanasio, Surveying the Risks of Carbon Dioxide: Geological Sequestration and Storage Projects in the United States, 39 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10376 (2009) (citing Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008)).
  • Michael Bablo, Note, Leslie Salt Co. v. United States: Does The Recent Supreme Court Decision in United States v. Lopez Dictate the Abrogation of the  "Migratory Bird Rule"?,14 Temp. Envtl. L. & Tech. J. 277 (1995) (citing Stephen Jay Stokes, The Limit of Government's Regulatory Authority Over Non-Adjacent Wetlands: Hoffman Homes, Inc. v. EPA, 15 Energy L.J. 137 (1994)).
  • Nicholas Bagley & Richard L. Revesz, Centralized Oversight of the Regulatory State, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 1260, 1329 (2006) (citing Peter Navarro & Michael Shames, Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned from California, 24 Energy L.J. 23 (2003)).
  • Koby Bailey, Comment, Energy “Goods”: Should Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code Apply to Energy Sales in a Deregulated Environment?, 37 J. Marshall L. Rev. 281 (2003) (citing Mark E. Haedicke, Competitive-Based Contracts for the New Power Business, 17 Energy L.J. 103 (1996)).
  • Paul Bailey, Elizabeth McCullough, Sonya Suter, Can Governments Ensure Adherence to the Polluter Pays Principle in the Long-Term CCS Liability Context?, 12 Sustainable Dev. L. & Pol'y 46 (2012) (citing Allan Ingelson, Anne Kleffner & Norma Nielson, Long-Term Liability For Carbon Capture And Storage In Depleted North American Oil And Gas Reservoirs - A Comparative Analysis, 31 Energy L.J. 431 (2010)).
  • Betsy Baker, Protection, Not Protectionism:  Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the Gatt, 26 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 437 (1993) (citing European Energy Charter, 13 Energy L.J. 1 (1992)).
  • Shalanda H. Baker, Unmasking Project Finance: Risk Mitigation, Risk Inducement, and an Invitation to Development Disaster?, 6 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L. 273 (2011) (citing Eric Marcks, Avoiding Liability for Human Rights Violations in Project Finance, 22 Energy L.J. 301 (2001)).
  • Nowell David Beckett Bamberger, In the Wake of Sakhalin II: How Non-Governmental Administration of Natural Resources Could Strengthen Russia’s Energy Sector, 16 Pac. Rim L. & Pol’y J. 669 (2007) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Vicki M. Baldwin & J. Robert Malko, Used and Useful Principle: Still Relevant in Utah, 25-FEB Utah B.J. 32 (2012) (citing Jonathan A. Lesser, The Used and Useful Test: Implications for a Restructured Electric Industry, 23 Energy L.J. 349 (2002)).
  • Alexander J. Bandza, South Coast Air Quality Management District v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: Ninth Circuit Holds Reliance on Problematic State Agency Standard Satisfies NEPA, 38 Ecology L.Q.579 (2011) (citing Monica Berry, Liquefied Natural Gas Import Terminals: Jurisdiction over Siting, Construction, and Operation in the Context of Commerce Clause Jurisprudence,26 Energy L.J. 135 (2005); James J. Hoecker, The NEPA Mandate and Federal Regulation of the Natural Gas Industry, 13 Energy L.J. 265 (1992)).
  • David P. Barker, Note, Who Pays? An Analysis of the Allocation of the Costs of Canceled Nuclear Power Plants After Duquesne Light Co. v. Barasch, 50 Ohio St. L.J. 999 (1989) (citing Small, A FERC Electric Rate Primer, 5 Energy L.J. 107 (1984)).
  • Christopher J. Barr, Unfinished Business: FERC’s Evolving Standard for Capacity Rights on Oil Pipelines, 32 Energy L.J. 563 (2011) (citing Christopher J. Barr, Growing Pains: FERC's Responses to Challenges to the Development of Oil Pipeline Infrastructure, 28 Energy L.J. 43 (2007)).
  • Robert A. Bassett & Sandra A. Snodgrass, Public Purpose or Private Profit: Condemnation for Natural Resources Development After Kelo v. New London, 53 Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation Institute 5-1 (2007) (citing Jim Behnke & Harold Dondis, The Sage Approach to Immediate Entry by Private Entities Exercising Federal Eminent Domain Authority Under the Natural Gas Act and the Federal Power Act,27 Energy L.J. 499 (2006)).
  • Elena A. Baylis & David Zaring, Sending the Bureaucracy to War, 92 Iowa L. Rev. 1359, 1428 (2007) (citing Report of the Natural Gas Committee, 25 Energy L.J. 217 (2004)).
  • Elena A. Baylis & David Zaring, Sending the Bureaucracy to War, 92 Iowa L. Rev. 1359, 1428 (2007) (citing Report of the Natural Gas Regulation Committee, 26 Energy L.J. 259 (2005)).
  • Maxwell S. Bayman, Subsidizing Advanced Nuclear Energy, 9 Okla. J. L. & Tech. 62 (2013) (citing Roland M. Frye, Jr., The Current “Nuclear Renaissance” in the United States, Its Underlying Reasons, and Its Potential Pitfalls, 29 Energy L.J. 279 (2008); Sony Ben-Moshe et al., Financing the Nuclear Renaissance: The Benefits and Potential Pitfalls of Federal & State Government Subsidies and the Future of Nuclear Power in California, 30 Energy L.J. 497 (2009)).
  • Leonard M. Baynes, How Much Is the Toll to Access the Information Superhighway? An Analysis of the Appropriate Measure of Compensation for the Partial Taking of Public Utility Property, 62 Tenn. L. Rev. 141 (1994) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and 'Takings’, 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989)).
  • 38 B.C. L. Rev. 811 (1997), Commerce Clause Implications of Massachusetts' Attempt to Limit the Importation of "Dirty" Power in the Looming Competitive Retail Market for Electricity Generation (citing Report of the Committee on Independent Power Production 1995-1996, 17 Energy L.J. 503, 513 (1996); Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995)).
  • James E. Beard, Symposium, An Application of the Principles of Sustainability to the Problem of Global Climate Change: An Argument for Integrated Energy Services, 11 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 191 (1996) (citing Clifford Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15 Energy L.J. 273 (1994)).
  • David H. Becker, Changing Direction in Administrative Agency Rulemaking: "Reasoned Analysis," The Roadless Rule Repeal, and the 2006 National Park Service Management Policies, 30-FALL Environs Envtl. L. & Pol'y J. 65 (2006) (citing Patrick J. McCormick III & Sean B. Cunningham, The Requirements of the “Just and Reasonable “Standard: Legal Bases for Reform of Electric Transmission Rates, 21 Energy L.J. 389 (2000)).
  • Darlene Bedley, A Look at the Proposed Electronic Communications Privacy Act Amendments Act of 2011: Where Is Smart Grid Technology, and How Does Inevitable Discovery Apply?, 36 Nova L. Rev. 521 (2012) (citing Energy Bar Association Panel Discussing the Smart Grid, 31 Energy L.J. 81 (2010)).
  • Jim Behnke & Harold Dondis, The Sage Approach to Immediate Entry by Private Entities Exercising Federal Eminent Domain Authority Under the Natural Gas Act and the Federal Power Act , 27 Energy L.J. 499, 544+ (2006) (citing Lauren Mohr, Comment, The Tangled Web: Regulation, Interstate Pipeline Companies, and Due Process Rights of Property Owners, 26 Energy L.J. 191 (2005)).
  • Robert Bejesky, Geopolitics, Oil Law Reform, and Commodity Market Expectations, 63 Okla. L. Rev. 193 (2011) (citing Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Robert Bejesky, Politico-International Law, 57 Loy. L. Rev. 29 (2011) (citing Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Sony Ben-Moshe et al., Financing the Nuclear Renaissance: The Benefits and Potential Pitfalls of Federal & State Government Subsidies and the Future of Nuclear Power in California, 30 Energy L.J. 497 (2009) (citing Roland M. Frye, Jr., The Current “Nuclear Renaissance” in the United States, Its Underlying Reasons, and Its Potential Pitfalls, 29 Energy L.J. 279 (2008)).
  • Stuart Minor Benjamin & Arti Ki. Rai, Fixing Innovation Policy: A Structural Perspective, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1 (2008) (citing Peter M. Crofton, Emerging Issues Relating to the Burgeoning Hydrogen Economy, 27 Energy L.J. 39 (2006)).
  • Mark H. Berman, The Intersection of Energy Law and Bankruptcy Law: Who Has the Stop Sign, ?8 J. Bankr. L. & Prac. 119  (1999) (citing Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995)).
  • Jon Bernhardt, Note, Is National Gas Pipeline Regulation Worth The Fuss?, 40 Stan. L. Rev. 753 (1988) (citing Griggs, Restructuring the Natural Gas Industry:  Order No. 436 and Other Regulatory Initiatives, 7 Energy L.J. 71 (1986); Means & Angyal, The Regulation and Future Role of Direct Producer Sales, 5 Energy L.J. 1 (1984); Coburn, The Case for Petroleum Pipeline Deregulation, 3 Energy L.J. 225 (1982)).
  • Emily Benz, Lessons from Fukushima: Strengthening the International Regulation of Nuclear Energy, 37 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 845 (2013) (citing  Jason Bjorn Aamodt, Comment, Regulating the Standard of Care Owed to the Public During an Emergency at a Nuclear Power Plant, 16 Energy L.J. 181 (1995)).
  • Derek Bertsch, When Good Intentions Collide: Seeking a Solution to Disputes Between Alternative Energy Development and the Endangered Species Act, 14 Sustainable Dev. L.J. 74 (2011) (citing Ambassador Stuart Eizenstat, The U.S. Role in Solving Climate Change: Green Growth Policies Can Enable Leadership Despite the Economic Downturn, 30 Energy L. J. 1 (2009)).
  • Ashutosh Bhagwat, Institutions and Long Term Planning: Lessons from the California Electricity Crisis, 55 Admin. L. Rev. 95 (2003) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the "Perfect Storm", 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001)).
  • Christopher Bidlack, Regulating the Inevitable: Understanding the Legal Consequences of and Providing for the Regulation of the Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide, 30 J. Land Resources & Envtl. L. 199 (2010) (citing Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007)).
  • Griffen A. H. Bishop, Post Blackout: FERC’s Pricing Incentives Must Be Tailored to Improve Grid Reliability and Efficiency, 56 Admin. L. Rev. 881 (2004) (citing Patrick J. McCormick III & Sean B. Cunningham, The Requirements of the “Just and Reasonable” Standard: Legal Bases for Reform of Electric Transmission Rates, 21 Energy L.J. 389 (2000)).
  • Alexander J. Black, European Law and Public Utility Open Access, 10 Fla. J. Int'l L. 117 (1995) (citing Alexander J. Black, Competition Law and British Natural Gas Regulation, 13 Energy L.J. 359 (1992)).
  • Bernard S. Black & Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The Choice Between Markets and Central Planning in Regulating the U.S. Electricity Industry, 93 Colum. L. Rev. 1339 (1993) (citing Miller, Jr., Conscripting State Regulatory Authorities in a Federal Electric Rate Regulatory Scheme: A Goal of PURPA Partially Realized, 4 Energy L.J. 77 (1983); Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988); Joshua Z. Rokach, Transmission Pricing Under the Federal Power Act: Applying a Market Screen, 14 Energy L.J. 95 (1993)).
  • Alexander J. Black, Direct Sales Of Gas In The European Community,Symposium, 1 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 119 (1993) (citing Alexander J. Black, Competition Law and British Natural Gas Regulation, 13 Energy L.J. 359 (1992)).
  • Alexander J. Black, Economic And Environmental Regulatory Relations: United States-Canada  Free-Trade in Energy, 8 Conn. J. Int'l L. 583 (1993) (citing Shelly P. Battram & Reinier H. Lock, The Canada/United States Free-Trade Agreement and Trade in Energy, 9 Energy L.J. 327 (1988); Robert C. Means & Robert S. Angyal, The Regulation and Future Role of Direct Producer Sales, 5 Energy L.J. 1 (1984)).  
  • Alexander J. Black, Symposium, Responsible Regulation: Incentive Rates for Natural Gas Pipelines, 28 Tulsa L.J. 349 (1993) (citing Robert S. Angyal & Roberta C. Means, The Regulation and Future Role of Direct Producer Sales, 5 Energy L.J. 1 (1984); Alexander J. Black, Competition Law and British Natural Gas Regulation, 13 Energy L.J. 359 (1992)).
  • Roger D. Blair, Reexamining the Role of Illinois Brick in Modern Antitrust Standing Analysis, 68 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1 (1999) (citing Robert Elkin & Robert J. Bluhm, Indirect Purchaser Standing in Antitrust Actions: Duplicative Liability in the Energy Industry, 11 Energy L.J. 185 (1990)).
  • F. Paul Bland, Problems of Price and Transportation: Two Proposals to Encourage Competition from Alternative Energy Sources, 10 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 345 (1986) (citing Norton & Spivak, The Wholesale Service Obligation of Electric Utilities, 6 Energy L.J. 179 (1985); Tiano & Zimmer, Wheeling for Cogeneration and Small Power Production Facilities, 3 Energy L.J. 95 (1982); Norton & Early, Limitations on the Obligation to Provide Access to Electric Transmission and Distribution Lines, 5 Energy L.J. 47 (1984)).
  • Robert F. Blomquist, Some (Mostly) Theoretical and (Very Brief) Pragmatic Observations on Environmental Alternative Dispute Resolution in America, 34 Val. U. L. Rev. 343 (2000) (citing Melissa Powell, Note, A Case Study for Stakeholders: An Alternative to Traditional Hydroelectric Relicensing, 18 Energy L.J. 405 (1997)).
  • William Blumenthal, Three Vexing Issues Under the Essential Facilities Doctrine: Atm Networks as Illustration, 58 Antitrust L.J. 855 (1989) (citing Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).
  • Paul Blyschak, State-Owned Enterprises and International Investment Treaties when Are State-Owned Entities and Their Investments Protected?, 6 J. of Int’l Law & Int’l Relations 1 (2011) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The Bell Tolls for Hydrocarbons: What's Next?, 29 Energy L.J. 381 (2008); Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Paul Blyschak, Yukos Universal v. Russia: Shell Companies and Treaty Shopping in International Energy Disputes, 10 Rish. J. Global L. & Bus. 179 (2011) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • L. Michael Bogert, The Paradox of the Palatable: Will the Endangered Species Act, NEPA, and Other Environmental Laws Hinder the Progress Of Energy Development?, 2009 No. 3 Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation Institute Paper No. 6 (2009) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • Ray S. Bolze, Practising Law Institute, PLI Order No. B0-013V (Oct. 22-23, 2001), Utility Restructuring Drawing Back the Regulatory Curtain: Antitrust Issues and Hypothetical Problems (citing Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000); Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997); Ray S. Bolze, John C. Peirce & Linda L. Walsh, Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000)).
  • Ray S. Bolze, Utility Restructuring Against the Backdrop of Regulation: Antitrust Issues and Hypothetical Problems,Practising Law Institute, PLI Order No. B0-00I5 (Oct. 2000) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997); John C. Peirce & Linda F. Walsh, Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000)).
  • Ray S. Bolze & Deborah A. Carpentier, Utility Restructuring Against the Backdrop of Regulation: Antitrust Issues, Practicing Law Institute, PLI Order No. B0-00BX (Oct. 1999), Utility Restructuring: Negotiating, Structuring and Documenting the Deal 1999 (Jan. 10,  1996) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).
  • Raymond S. Bolze & Deborah A. Carpentier, Structuring Transactions Against the Backdrop of Regulation: Antitrust Issues, Practicing Law Institute, PLI Order No. B0-003B (Oct. 1998) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers:  A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).
  • Charlton H. Bonham, The Condit Dam Removal and Section 18 of the Federal Power Act: A Coerced Settlement, 14 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 97 (1999) (citing Michael A. Swiger et al., Paying for  the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing?, 17 Energy  L.J. 163 (1996)).
  • William A. Borders, Note, Learning from the Storm: Lessons for Illinois Following California's Experience with Electricity Restructuring, 77 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 333 (2001) (citing Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Electric Retail Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 Energy L.J. 27 (2000).
  • Fred P. Bosselman, The Ecological Advantages of Nuclear Power, 15 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 1, 52 (2007) (citing Report of the Legislation and Regulatory Reform Committee, 26 Energy L.J. 253 (2005)).
  • Fred P. Bosselman, The Ecological Advantages of Nuclear Power, 15 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 1, 52 (2007) (citing Peter M. Crofton, Emerging Issues Relating to the Burgeoning Hydrogen Economy, 27 Energy L.J. 39 (2006)).
  • Fred P. Bosselman, The Ecological Advantages of Nuclear Power, 15 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 1, 52+ (2007) (citing Monika Ehrman, Competition is a Sin: An Evaluation of the Formation and Effects of a Natural Gas OPEC, 27 Energy L.J. 175 (2006)).
  • Fred Bosselman, The Future of Electricity Infrastructure, 42/43 Urb. Law. 115 (2011) (citing Ronald E. Minsk et al., Plugging Cars into the Grid: Why the Government Should Make a Choice, 30 Energy L.J. 317 (2009); Debbie Swanstrom & Meredith M. Jolivert, DOE Transmission Corridor Designations & FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities?, 30 Energy L.J. 415 (2009)).
  • Fred Bosselman, Green Diesel: Finding a Place for Algae Oil, 86 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 291 (2011) (citing Ronald E. Minsk et al., Plugging Cars into the Grid: Why the Government Should Make a Choice, 30 Energy L.J. 317 (2009)).
  • Fred Bosselman, Swamp Swaps: The "Second Nature" Of Wetlands, 39 Envtl. L. 577 (2009) (citing EBA Climate Change Primer: Financing a Renewable Energy Project, 29 Energy L.J. 195 (2008); Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • William P. Boswell & James P. Cargas, North American Energy Standards Board: Legal and Administrative Underpinnings of a Consensus Based Organization , 27 Energy L.J. 147, 174 (2006) (citing Hon. Suedeen Kelly, Maria F. Vouras & Jennifer S. Amerkhail, The Subdelegation Doctrine and the Application of Reference Prices in Mitigating Market Power, 26 Energy L.J. 297 (2005)).
  • Anthony V. Bova, What's the Holdup? How Bureaucratic Obstacles Are Undercutting the True Potential of American Wind Power, 46 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 571 (2013) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • Louis Lawrence Boyle, Comment, Electrifying Solutions for the Shocking and Disparate Treatment of Electricity Within Product Liability Law, 93 Dick. L. Rev. 851 (1989) (citing Wholesale Customer Loads in a Competitive Environment: The Obligation to Provide Wholesale Service Under the Federal Power Act, 8 Energy L.J. 237 (1987)).
  • Rick Bradley, One Step in the Right Direction: An Analysis of FERC’s Reporting Requirement for Status Changes for Public Utilities with Market-Based Rate Authority, 1 Environs Envtl & Energy L. & Pol’y J. 373, 377 (2007) (citing William H. Hieronymus, J. Stephen Henderson & Carolyn A. Berry, Market Power Analysis of the Electricity Generation Sector, 23 Energy L.J. 1 (2002)).
  • Rick Bradley, One Step in the Right Direction: An Analysis of FERC’s Reporting Requirement for Status Changes for Public Utilities with Market-Based Rate Authority, 1 Environs Envtl & Energy L. & Pol’y J. 373, 395 (2007) (citing Hon. Josephy T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, and the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1(2005)).
  • Rick Bradley, One Step in the Right Direction: An Analysis of FERC’s Reporting Requirement for Status Changes for Public Utilities with Market-Based Rate Authority , 1 Envtl & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 373, 395 (2007) (citing Hon. Suedeen Kelly, Maria F. Vouras & Jennifer S. Amerkhail, The Subdelegation Doctrine and the Application of Reference Prices in Mitigating Market Power, 26 Energy L.J. 297 (2005)).
  • Rick Bradley, One Step in the Right Direction: An Analysis of FERC’s Reporting Requirement for Status Changes for Public Utilities with Market-Based Rate Authority , 1 Envtl & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 373, 395+ (2007) (citing U.S. Sen. James M. Inhofe & Frank Fannon, Energy and the Environment: The Future of Natural Gas in America, 26 Energy L.J. 349 (2005)).
  • Rick Bradley, One Step in the Right Direction: An Analysis of FERC’s Reporting Requirement for Status Changes for Public Utilities with Market-Based Rate Authority , 1 Envtl & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 373, 395 (2007) (citing David G. Tewksbury & Stephanie S. Lim, Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts, 26 Energy L.J. 437 (2005)).
  • Rick Bradley, One Step in the Right Direction: An Analysis of FERC’s Reporting Requirement for Status Changes for Public Utilities with Market-Based Rate Authority , 1 Envtl & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 373, 395 (2007) (citing Antitrust Subcommittee Report, 26 Energy L.J. 521 (2005)).
  • Rick Bradley, One Step in the Right Direction: An Analysis of FERC’s Reporting Requirement for Status Changes for Public Utilities with Market-Based Rate Authority, 1 Envt'l & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 373, 395 (2007) (citing Antitrust Committee Report, 27 Energy L.J. 235 (2006)).
  • Rick Bradley, One Step in the Right Direction: An Analysis of FERC’s Reporting Requirement for Status Changes for Public Utilities with Market-Based Rate Authority, 1 Envt'l & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 373, 395 (2007) (citing Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 373 (2006)).
  • Richard R. Bradley, One Step in the Right Direction: An Analysis of FERC’s Reporting Requirement for Status Changes for Public Utilities with Market-Based Rate Authority, 1 Envt'l & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 373 (2007) (citing David G. Tewksbury & Stephanie S. Lim, Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts, 26 Energy L.J. 437 (2005)).
  • Richard R. Bradley, Over the River and (Around) the Woods to Grandma’s House We Go: Long-Term Firm Transmission Rights, Transmission Market Power, & Gaming Strategies in a Deregulated Energy Market An International Comparison, 30 Hous. J. Int’l L. 327 (2008) (citing Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007); Joe D. Pace & John H. Landon, Introducing Competition into the Electric Utility Industry: An Economic Appraisal, 3 Energy L.J. 1 (1982)).
  • Kirsten Braun, Carbon Storage: Discerning Resource Biases That Influence Treaty Negotiations, 22 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev. 649 (2010) (citing Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008)).
  • Emily S. Bremer, Incorporation by Reference in an Open-Government Age, 36 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 131 (2013) (citing William P. Boswell and James P. Cargas, North American Energy Standards Board: Legal and Administrative Underpinnings of a Consensus Based Organization, 27 Energy L.J. 147 (2006)).
  • B. Victoria Brennan, Domestic Environmental Energy Technology and Investment Abroad Under the Energy Policy Act of 1992, 1 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 267 (1994) (citing D.F. Santa & P.J. Beneke, Federal Natural Gas Policy and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, 14 Energy L.J. 1, 4 (1993); R.L. Sarosdy, May Acid Rain Legislation Excuse Performance Obligations Under Coal Contracts, 14 Energy L.J. 303 (1993); C.L. Van Orman, The National Energy Strategy - An Illusive Quest for Energy Security, 13 Energy L.J. 251 (1992)).
  • Richard P. Bress et al., A Deal Is Still a Deal: Morgan Stanley Capital Group v. Public Utility District No. 1, 2008 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 285 (2008) (citing Michael J. Gergen et al., Market-Based Ratemaking and the Western Energy Crisis of 2000 and 2001, 24 Energy L.J. 321 (2003)).
  • Stuart Broom, The Formation of International Energy Transactions, 13 U.S.-Mex. L.J. 21 (2005) (citing John P. Mathis & Miguel S. Escobedo, Mexico’s Open Door to Cogeneration and Independent Power, 14 Energy L.J. 285 (1993)).
  • Joseph F. Brodley, Symposium, Proof of Efficiencies in Mergers and Joint Ventures, 64 Antitrust L.J. 575 (1996) (citing Raymond S. Hartman, The Efficiency Effects of Electric Utility Mergers: Lessons from Statistical Cost Analysis, 17 Energy L.J. 401 (1996); Raymond S. Hartman, The Efficiency Effects of Electric Utility Mergers: Lessons from Statistical Cost Analysis, 1 Energy L.J. 401 (1996)).
  • Ashley C. Brown & Jim Rossi, Siting Transmission Lines in a Changed Milieu: Evolving Notions of the “Public Interest” in Balancing State and Regional Considerations, 81 U. Colo. L. Rev.  705 (2010) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Jon Wellinghoff & David L. Morenoff, Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation, 28 Energy L.J. 389 (2007); Richard J. Pierce, The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994)).
  • Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489, 515 (2007) (citing Darrell Blakeway & Carol Brotman White, Tapping the Power of Wind: FERC Initiatives to Facilitate Transmission of Wind Power, 26 Energy L.J. 393 (2005)).
  • Christopher Brown, Piedmont Environmental Council v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 61 S.C. L. Rev. 639 (2010) (citing Debbie Swanstrom & Meredith M. Jolivert, Doe Transmission Corridor Designations & FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities?, 30 Energy L.J. 415 (2009)).
  • Vanessa S. Browne-Barbour, A Fork in the Road: The Intersection of Virtual Law Practice and Social Media, 52 Washburn L.J. 267 (2013) (citing Carolyn Elefant, The “Power” of Social Media: Legal Issues & Best Practices for Utilities Engaging Social Media, 32 Energy L.J. 1 (2011)).
  • Sharon Brown-Hruska & Robert Zwirb, CFTC & FERC vs. Amaranth: Doing the Sister Regulator Act, 27 Futures & Derivatives Law Report 1 (2007) (citing Joseph T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, and the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1 (2005)).
  • Thomas Brugato, The Property Problem: A Survey of Federal Options for Facilitating Acquisition of Carbon Sequestration Repositories, 29 Va. Envtl. L.J. 305 (2011) (citing Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework For Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L. J. 421 (2008); Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geological Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007)).
  • Samuel R. Brumberg, Getting the Camel Out of the Tent: Behind the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Rise to Power and the Importance of States' Continued Regulatory Oversight, 30 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 691, 730+ (2006) (citing John S. Moot, Economic Theories of Regulation and Electricity Restructuring, 25 Energy L.J. 273 (2004)).
  • Alexia Brunet & Juan Agustin Lentini, Arbitration of International Oil, Gas, and Energy Disputes in Latin America, 27 Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 591 (2007) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Margaret Bryant, Wind Energy in Texas: An Argument for Developing Offshore Wind Farms, 4 Envt'l & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 127 (2009) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • Anita Starchman Bryant, Amoco Production Co. v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe, 27 Ecology L.B. 799 (2000) (citing Stacy L. Leeds, Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Company: Judicial Construction of Coalbed Methane Gas Ownership, 17 Energy L.J. 489 (1996)).
  • Beth C. Bryant, Notes & Comments, FERC's Dam Decommissioning Authority Under the Federal Power Act, 74 Wash. L. Rev. 95 (1999) (citing Michael A. Swiger et al., Paying for the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing?, 17 Energy L.J. 163 (1996)).
  • Joseph E. Buandt & Julie A. Harrison, Resources on Oil and Gas Law, 78 Mich. B.J. 232 (1999) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).  
  • Michael Burger, "It's Not Easy Being Green": Local Initiatives, Preemption Problems, and the Market Participant Exception, 78 U. Cin. L. Rev. 835 (2010) (citing  Jacob Dweck et al., Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006)).
  • Elizabeth Burleson, Energy Security, Green Job Creation, and Youth Innovation, 24 Conn. J. Int'l L. 381 (2009) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2008)).
  • Carolyn F. Burr et. al., Water: The Fuel for Colorado Energy, 15 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 275 (2012) (citing Dr. Benjamin K. Sovacool, Running on Empty The Electricity-Water Nexus and the U.S. Electric Utility Sector, 30 Energy L. J. 11, 13 (2009)).
  • 43 Bus. Law 795 (1988), Energy Law (citing Echeverria, The Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986, 8 Energy L.J. 61  (1987); Reiter, The FERC's New Rules of Discovery: A Welcomed Approach, 8 Energy L.J. 35 (1987)).  
  • Darren Bush, Too Big to Bail: The Role of Antitrust in Distressed Industries, 77 Antitrust L.J. 277 (2010) (citing Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Retail Electric Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 Energy L.J. 27 (2000)).
  • Darren Bush & Carrie Mayne, In (Reluctant) Defense of Enron: Why Bad Regulation Is to Blame for California's Power Woes (or Why Antitrust Law Fails to Protect Against Market Power when the Market Rules Encourage Its Use), 83 Or. L. Rev. 207 (2004) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the “Perfect Storm,” 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001)).
  • Darren Bush and Carrie Mayne , In (Reluctant) Defense of Enron: Why Bad Regulation Is to Blame for California’s Power Woes (or Why Antitrust Law Fails to Protect Against Market Power When the Market Rules Encourage Its Use), 83 Or. L. Rev. 207, 237, 239, 243, 265 (2004) (citing Peter Navarro & Michael Shames, Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned From California, 24 Energy L.J. 23 (2003)).
  • Darren Bush & Carrie Mayne, In (Reluctant) Defense of Enron: Why Bad Regulation Is to Blame for California's Power Woes (Or Why Antitrust Law Fails to Protect Against Market Power when the Market Rules Encourage Its Use), 83 Or. L. Rev. 207, 285+ (2004) (citing Report of the Electric Utility Regulation Committee, 24 Energy L.J. 191 (2003)).
  • Stephen Harland Butler, Headwinds to a Clean Energy Future: Nuisance Suits Against Wind Energy Projects in the United States, 97 Cal. L. Rev. 1337 (2009) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • William W. Buzbee, Asymmetrical Regulation: Risk, Preemption, and the Floor/Ceiling Distinction, 82 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1547, 1619 (2007) (citing Jacob Dweck, David Wochner & Michael Brooks, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006)).
  • William W. Buzbee, Interaction's Promise: Preemption Policy Shifts, Risk Regulation, and Experimentalism Lessons, 57 Emory L.J. 145, 165 (2007) (citing Jacob Dweck, David Wochner, and Michael Brooks, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006)).  
  • Marvin C. Bynum II, Testing the Waters: Assessing Wisconsin's Regulatory Climate for Offshore Wind Projects, 93 Marq. L. Rev. 1533 (2010) (citing Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2008)).
  • Phoenix X. F. Cai, Think Big and Ignore the Law: U.S. Corn and Ethanol Subsidies and WTO Law, 40 Geo. J. Int'l L. 865 (2009) (citing Kaylan Lytle, Driving the Market: The Effects on the United States Ethanol Industry if the Foreign Ethanol Tariff is Lifted, 28 Energy L.J. 693 (2007)).
  • Amy Callard, Note, Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Company: A Conflict over What Killed the Canary, 33 Tulsa L.J. 909 (1998) (citing Donald F. Santa, Jr. & Patricia J. Beneke, Federal Natural Gas Policy and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, 14 Energy L.J. 1, 44-45 (1993)).
  • Andrew Campbell, You Don't Need A Weatherman to Know Which Way the Wind Blows? : An Argument for Offshore Wind Development in the Gulf of Mexico (Fnaa1), 50 Hous. L. Rev. 899 (2013) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • Trevor E. Carson, The Decision from the Court of First Instance That Destroyed the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, 23 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 157 (2010) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L. J. 1 (2008)).
  • Peter C. Carstensen, Creating Workably Competitive Wholesale Markets in Energy: Necessary Conditions, Structure, and Conduct , 1 Envtl & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 85, 144 (2005) (citing William A. Mogel & John P. Gregg, Appropriateness of Imposing Common Carrier Status on Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, 25 Energy L.J. 21 (2004)).
  • Alexander Cavalli & Jane K. Winn, Internet Security in the Electric Utility Industry, 38 Jurimetrics J. 459 (1998) (citing Report of the Committee on Electric Utility Regulation, 18 Energy L.J. 197 (1997); Report of the Committee on Independent Power Production 1995-1996, 17 Energy L.J. 503 (1996)).
  • Lawrence G. Cetrulo, 3 Toxic Torts Litigation Guide § 22:7, The Problematic Nature of Exposure Measurement (2011) (citing David Zachary Kaufman, Review of Electric and Magnetic Fields: Invisible Risks?, 18 Energy L.J. 435 (1997)).
  • Leah B. Chacon, Long-Term Contracting the Way to Renewable Energy Investment: Lessons from Brazil Applied to the United States, 62 Emory L.J. 1563 (2013) (citing Citing: Mary Ann Ralls, Congress Got It Right: There's No Need to Mandate Renewable Portfolio Standards, 27 Energy L.J. 451 (2006)).
  • Kyle Chadwick, Crossed Wires: Federal Preemption of States' Authority over Retail Wheeling of Electricity, 48 Admin. L. Rev. 191 (1996) (citing Report of the Commission on Independent Power, 16 Energy L.J. 205 (1995); Richard J. Pierce, Jr.,  The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and  Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994); Isaac D. Benkin, Who Makes the Rules? Federal and State  Jurisdiction over Electric Transmission Access, 13 Energy L.J. 45 (1992)).
  • Danielle Changala & Paul Foley, The Legal Regime of Widespread Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Adoption: A Vermont Case Study, 32 Energy L.J. 99 (2011) (citing Ronald Minsk, Sam Ori & Sabrina Howell, Plugging Cars into the Grid: Why the Government Should Make a Choice, 30 Energy L.J. 317 (2009)).
  • Jim Chen, The Price of Macroeconomic Imprecision: How Should the Law Measure Inflation?,54 Hastings L.J. 1375 (2003) (citing Steven Reed & Pantelis Michalopoulos, Oil Pipeline Regulatory Reform: Still in the Labyrinth?, 16 Energy L.J. 65 (1995); Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Jim Chen, Standing in the Shadows of Giants: The Role of Intergenerational Equity in Telecommunications Reform, 71 U. Colo. L. Rev. 921 (2000) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and "Takings", 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989); Clinton A. Vince & John S. Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation in a Post- Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989)).
  • Jim Chen, Commentary, The Second Coming of Smyth v. Ames, 77 Tex. L. Rev. 1535 (1999) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1, 10  (1988); Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994); S. Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15 Energy L.J. 273 (1994)).
  • Jim Chen, Fugitives and Agrarians in a World Without Frontiers, 18 Cardozo L. Rev. 1031 (1996) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994)).
  • Jim C. Chen, Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, Something Blue, 58 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1527 (1991).  Note: This article is reviewing the Bluebook, and criticizes it for not having the Energy Law Journal on the list of Periodicals.
  • Jim Chen, The Death of the Regulatory Compact: Adjusting Prices and Expectations in the Law of Regulated Industries, 67 Ohio St. L.J. 1265 (2006) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and “Takings”,10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989); Clinton A. Vince & John S. Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation in a Post Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989)).
  • Jim Chen, The Nature of the Public Utility: Infrastructure, the Market, and the Law, 98 Nw. U.L. Rev. 1617 (2004) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Energy Crisis: How Best to Respond to the “Perfect Storm,” 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001); Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and “Takings”, 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989); Clinton A. Vince & John S. Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation in a Post Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989)).
  • Sungjoon Cho, Claire R. Kelly, Promises and Perils of New Global Governance: A Case of the G20, 12 Chi. J. Int'l L. 491 (2012) (citing Stuart Eizenstat, The U.S. Role in Solving Climate Change: Green Growth Policies Can Enable Leadership Despite Economic Downturn, 30 Energy L J 1 (2008)).
  • Stephen J. Choi and Robert B. Thompson, Securities Litigation and Its Lawyers: Changes During the First Decade After the PSLRA, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 1489, 1533 (2006) (citing James G. Bohn, Securities Litigation in the Utility Sector, 26 Energy L.J. 473 (2005)).
  • William L. Church, The Eastern Enterprises Case: New Vigor For Judicial Review?,2000 Wis. L. Rev. 547 (2000) (citing Staci L. Smith, Note, Nontraditional Takings and the Coal Act, 20 Energy L.J. 117 (1999)).
  • Rachel Clingman & Audrey Cumming, The 2005 Energy Policy Act: Analysis of the Jurisdictional Basis for Federal Siting of LNG Facilities, 2 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L. 57 (2007) (citing Monica Berry, Liquefied Natural Gas Import Terminals: Jurisdiction over Siting, Construction, and Operation in the Context of Commerce Clause, 26 Energy L.J. 135 (2005); Jim Behnke, Safety Jurisdiction Over Natural Gas Pipelines, 19 Energy L.J. 71, 77 (1998)).
  • Thomas A. Cloud, Birch Rods in the Cupboard: The Link Between Municipal Franchise Purchase Options and Franchise Fees in Florida, 35 Stetson L. Rev. 383 (2006) (citing James W. Moeller, Electric Utilities and Telecommunications, 16 Energy L.J. 95 (1995)).
  • Rodrick J. Coffey, Notes and Comments, Fairness Is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Conflicting Interpretations of the Correct Measure of Damages for Breaches of Natural Gas Contracts Containing Take-or-Pay Provisions, 14 BYU J. Pub. L. 151 (1999) (citing Stimpert, Note, Lenape Resources Corporation v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company: Natural Gas Take-or-Pay Contracts Under the Uniform Commercial Code, 18 Energy L.J. 421 (1997)).
  • George Cameron Coggins, Watershed as a Public Natural Resource on the Federal Lands, 11 Va. Envtl. L.J. 1 (1991) (citing Goodwin & Lookadoo, Municipal Preference and the Private Hydropower Project Developer, 7 Energy L.J. 111 (1986)).
  • Joseph R. Coker, Saving Otter Tail: The Essential Facilities Doctrine and Electric Power Post-Trinko, 33 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 231 (2005) (citing Robert J. Michaels, The Governance of Transmission Operators, 20 Energy L.J. 233 (1999); Lawrence J. Spiwak, Is the Price Squeeze Doctrine Still Viable in Fully-Regulated Energy Markets?, 14 Energy L.J. 75 (1993)).
  • Bonnie G. Colby, Assessing the Value of Adjudications in a World of Uncertainty: An Economic Perspective, 10 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 327 (2007) (citing Michael A. Swiger, Ann P. Southwick & Stephanie L. Mairs, Paying for the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing?, 17 Energy L.J. 163 (1996)).
  • John D. Collins, Reclamation and Groundwater Restoration in the Uranium Milling Industry: An Assessment of Umtrca, Title Ii,11 J. Nat. Resources & Envtl. L. 23 (1995-6) (citing W. Ciaravella, Note, Regulation of Hazardous Air Pollutants under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 15 Energy L.J. 485 (1994)).  
  • Hannah Coman, Balancing the Need for Energy and Clean Water: The Case for Applying Strict Liability in Hydraulic Fracturing Suits, 39 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 131 (2012) (citing Allan Ingelson et al., Long-Term Liability for Carbon Capture and Storage in Depleted North American Oil and Gas Reservoirs--A Comparative Analysis, 31 Energy L.J. 431 (2010)).
  • 13A Comm. Reg.: Fraud, Manipulation, & Other Claims, 23:23. Parallel Proceedings, Double Jeopardy and Bankruptcy (2008) (citing Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 373 (2006)).
  • 13A Comm. Reg.: Fraud, Manipulation, & Other Claims, 23:36. Jurisdictional Issues (2008) (citing Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 373 (2006)).
  • 13A Comm. Reg.: Fraud, Manipulation, & Other Claims, 28:6. FERC Jurisdiction (2008) (citing Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 373 (2006)).
  • Loïc Conan, The Trans-Saharan Gas Pipeline: An Overview of the Threats to Its Success and the Means to Prevent Its Failure, 31 Utah Envtl. L. Rev. 205 (2011) (citing S. Scott Gaille, The Use of Quantity Terms to Improve Efficiency and Stability in International Gas Sales & Purchase Agreements, 29 Energy L.J. 645 (2008)).
  • Hanna Conger, A Lesson from Cape Wind: Implementation of Offshore Wind Energy in the Great Lakes Should Occur Through Multi-State Cooperation, 42 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 741 (2011) (citing Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2008)).
  • Austin Conner, Twenty Percent Wind Energy by 2030: Keys to Meeting the DOE's Goal, 5 Envt'l & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 130 (2010) (citing Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2008)).
  • Charles J. Cooper & Brian Stuart Koukoutchos, Federalism and the Telephone: The Case for Preemptive Federal Deregulation in the New World of Intermodal Competition, 6 J. Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 293 (2008) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).
  • Katharine Costenbader, Comment, Damning Dams: Bearing The Cost Of Restoring America's Rivers, 6 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 635 (1998) (citing Michael Swiger et al., Paying for the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing, 17 Energy L.J. 163 (1996)).
  • Christopher Cotter, Wind Power and the Renewable Portfolio Standard: An Ohio Analysis, 32 U. Dayton L. Rev. 405, 439+ (2007) (citing Darrell Blakeway & Carol Brotman White, Tapping the Power of Wind: FERC Initiatives to Facilitate Transmission of Wind Power, 26 Energy L.J. 393 (2005)).
  • John F. Coverdale, Court Review of Tax Regulations and Revenue Rulings in the Chevron Era, 64 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 35 (1992) (citing Jerome Nelson, The Chevron  Deference Rule and Judicial Review of FERC Orders, 9 Energy L.J. 59 (1988)).
  • Seth Cox, A Regulatory Reinterpretation to Blow Away Dirty Energy?, 17 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 258 (2010) (citing Darrell Blakeway & Carol B. White, Tapping the Power of Wind: FERC Initiatives to Facilitate Transmission of Wind Power, 26 Energy L.J. 393 (2005)).
  • Gregory Scott Crespi, Ranking the Environmental Law, Natural Resources Law, and Land Use Planning Journals: A Survey of Expert Opinion, 23 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 273 (1998).
  • Gianna Cricco-Lizza, Hydraulic Fracturing and Cooperative Federalism: Injecting Reality into Policy Formation, 42 Seton Hall L. Rev. 703 (2012) (citing Committee Report: Legislative Committee, 27 Energy L. J. 349 (2006))
  • Peter M. Crofton, Emerging Issues Relating to the Burgeoning Hydrogen Economy, 27 Energy L.J. 39, 64+ (2006) (citing Russell Moy, Tort Law Considerations for the Hydrogen Economy, 24 Energy L.J. 349 (2003)).
  • Peter M. Crofton, Emerging Issues Relating to the Burgeoning Hydrogen Economy, 27 Energy L.J. 39, 64+ (2006) (citing William Vincent, Hydrogen and Tort Law: Liability Concerns Are not a Bar to a Hydrogen Economy, 25 Energy L.J. 385 (2004)).
  • Paul M. Cryan, Wind Turbines as Landscape Impediments to the Migratory Connectivity of Bats, 41 Envtl. L. 355 (2011) (citing John Arnold McKinsey, Regulating Avian Impacts Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Other Laws: The Wind Industry Collides with One of Its Own, the Environmental Protection Movement, 28 Energy L.J. 71 (2007)).
  • Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, Full Circle in the Formerly Regulated Industries?,33 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 767 (2002) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113, 120 (1997); Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994)).
  • Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, Electric Deregulation After California: Down but Not Out, 54 Admin. L. Rev. 333 (2002) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994)).
  • Richard D. Cudahy, Whither Deregulation: A Look at the Portents, 58 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 155  (2001) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).
  • Hon. Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35, 109 (2005) (citing William H. Hieronymus, J. Stephen Henderson & Carolyn A. Berry, Market Power Analysis of the Electricity Generation Sector, 23 Energy L.J. 1 (2002)).
  • Richard Cudahy & William Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35, 110+ (2005) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is this Revolution Necessary?, 25 Energy L.J. 161 (2004)).
  • Richard Cudahy & William Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35, 110+ (2005) (citing William L. Massey, Robert S. Fleishman & Mary J. Doyle, Reliability Based Competition in Wholesale Electricity: Legal and Policy Prospectives, 25 Energy L.J. 319 (2004)).
  • Richard D. Cudahy, Asian Amperes: Chinese Electric Power, 29 Energy L.J. 33, 48+ (2008) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise And Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Richard D. Cudahy, Asian Amperes: Chinese Electric Power, 29 Energy L.J. 33, 48+ (2008) (citing Robert W. Gee, Songbin Zhu & Xiaolin Li, China’s Power Sector: Global Economic and Environmental Implications, 28 Energy L.J. 421 (2007)).
  • Luis E. Cuervo, The Uncertain Fate of Venezuela's Black Pearl: The Petrostate and Its Ambiguous Oil and Gas Legislation, 32 Hous. J. Int'l L. 637 (2010) (citing Jay Martin, Venezuela as an Opportunity for Investment in the Petroleum Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 325 (1999)).
  • Brandon D. Cunningham, Border Petrol: U.S. Challenges to Canadian Tar Sands Development, 19 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 489 (2012) (citing Int'l Energy Transactions Comm., Energy Bar Ass'n, Report of the International Energy Transactions Committee, 30 Energy L.J. 207 (2009); Alastair R. Lucas, Canada's Role in The United States' Oil and Gas Supply Security: Oil Sands, Arctic Gas, NAFTA, and Canadian Kyoto Protocol Impacts, 25 Energy L.J. 403 (2004)).
  • André Douglas Pond Cummings, Still "Ain't No Glory In Pain”: How The Telecommunications Act of 1996 and Other 1990s Deregulation Facilitated the Market Crash of 2002, 12 Fordham J. of Corp. & Fin. L. 467 (2007) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise And Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • André Douglas Pond Cummings, Still "Ain't No Glory In Pain”: How The Telecommunications Act of 1996 and Other 1990s Deregulation Facilitated the Market Crash of 2002, 12 Fordham J. of Corp. & Fin. L. 467+ (2007) (citing Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 373 (2006)).
  • Angela C. Cupas, The Not-So-Safe Drinking Water Act: Why We Must Regulate Hydraulic Fracturing at the Federal Level, 33 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 605, 632+ (2009) (citing James M. Inhofe & Frank Fannon, Energy and the Environment: The Future of Natural Gas in America, 26 Energy L.J. 349 (2005)).
  • Heather Curlee, Examining EPACT 2005: A Prospective Look at the Changing Regulatory Approach of the FERC, 63 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1649, 1691 (2006) (citing Hon. Josephy T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, and the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1(2005)).
  • Heather Curlee, Examining EPACT 2005: A Prospective Look at the Changing Regulatory Approach of the FERC, 63 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1649, 1691+ (2006) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise And Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Heather Curlee, Examining EPACT 2005: A Prospective Look at the Changing Regulatory Approach of the FERC, 63 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1649, 1691 (2006) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, 70th Anniversary Celebration of the Federal Power Act, 26 Energy L.J. 389 (2005)).
  • Anne D. Curley, Note, Requirements for Constructed or Reconstructed Major Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants: Regulations for MACT Determinations Under Section 112(G) of the Clean Air Act,4 Envtl. L. 225 (1997) (citing V. Ciaravella, Comment, Regulation of Hazardous Air Pollutants Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 15 Energy L.J. 485 (1994)).
  • Steven D. Czajkowski, Focusing on Demand Side Management in the Future of the Electric Grid, 4 Pitt. J. Envtl Pub. Health L. 115 (2010) (citing Jon Wellinghoff & David L. Morenoff, Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation, 28 Energy L.J. 389 (2007); John S. Moot, Economic Theories of Regulation and Electricity Restructuring, 25 Energy L.J. 273, 274-75 (2004)).
  • Alexander T. Dadok, On the Pulse of America: The Federal Government's Assertion of Jurisdiction over Electric Transmission Planning and Its Effect on the Public Interest, 91 N.C. L. Rev. 997 (2013) (citing Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel A. Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543 (2007)).
  • Stacey Dahl, North Dakota's Novel Approach to Corporate Governance: A Shifting Landscape in Corporate Management or a Futile Assertion of Large Shareholders' Rights?, 84 N.D. L. Rev. 1161 (2008) (citing Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Hoang Dang, New Power, Few New Lines: A Need For A Federal Solution, 17 J. Land Use & Envtl. L. 327 (2002) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994)).
  • Brigham Daniels, Governing the Presidential Nomination Commons, 84 Tul. L. Rev. 899 (2010) (citing  Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 25 Energy L.J. 57 (2004)).
  • Thomas von Danwitz, Regulation and Liberalization of the European Electricity Market - A German View, 27 Energy L.J. 423, 450 (2006) (citing Clinton A. Vance, Sherry A. Quirk, Stanley P. Wolf, Travis R. Smith, Sandra Barbulescu & Monica Berry, What is Happening and Where in the World of RTOs and ISOs?, 27 Energy L.J. 65 (2006)).
  • Joan M. Darby et al., The Role of FERC and the States in Approving and Siting Interstate Natural Gas Facilities and LNG Terminals After the Energy Policy Act Of 2005 - Consultation, Preemption and Cooperative Federalism, 6 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L 335 (2011) (citing Jacob Dweck, David Wochner & Michael Brooks, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006)).
  • Frank P. Darr, A State Regulatory Strategy for the Transitional Phase of Gas Regulation, 12 Yale J. on Reg. 69 (1995) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1, 6 (1988); Frank P. Darr, Mitigating Costs and the Preemptive Effect of Federal Rate Orders, 13 Energy L.J. 61 (1992); F. Santa, Jr. & Patricia J. Beneke, Federal Natural Gas Policy and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, 14 Energy L.J. 1 (1993)).
  • Frank P. Darr, A Critical Analysis of Joint Board Policy at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 30 San Diego L. Rev. 485 (1993) (citing Megan A. Wallace, A Negotiated Alternative to Mandatory Wheeling , 10 Energy L.J. 99, (1989); Frank P. Darr, Book Review, 10 Energy L.J. 337 (1989)).
  • Frank P. Darr, Federal-State Comity In Utility Bankruptcies, 27 Am. Bus. L.J. 63 (1989) (citing Duffy, Will the Supreme Court Lose Patience with Prudence?, 9 Energy L.J. 83 (1988); Nixon & Johnston, Nantahala Affirms Narragansett-Whither Pike County?, 8 Energy L.J. 1 (1987)).
  • Lincoln L. Davies, Alternative Energy and the Energy-Environment Disconnect, 46 Idaho L. Rev. 473 (2010) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007)).
  • Lincoln L. Davies, Energy Policy Today and Tomorrow-Toward Sustainability?, 29 J. Land Resources & Envtl. L. 71 (2009) (citing Sen. James M. Inhofe & Frank Fannon, Energy and the Environment: The Future of Natural Gas in America, 26 Energy L.J. 349 (2005)).
  • Lincoln L. Davies, Power Forward: The Argument for a National RPS, 42 Conn. L. Rev. 1339 (2010) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2008); Jeff D. Makholm, “Decoupling” for Energy Distributors: Changing 19th Century Tariff Structures To Address 21st Century Energy Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 157 (2008); Panel Discussion, EBA Climate Change Primer: Cap and Trade, 29 Energy L.J. 173 (2008); Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007); Kevin F. Duffy, Will the Supreme Court Lose Patience with Prudence?, 9 Energy L.J. (1988)).
  • Lincoln L. Davies, Reconciling Renewable Portfolio Standards and Feed-in Tariffs, 32 Utah Envtl. L. Rev. 311 (2012) (citing Markian M.W. Melnyk & William S. Lamb, PUHCA's Gone, What Is Next for Holding Companies?, 27 Energy L.J. 1 (2006); Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2008); Allison S. Clements & Douglass D. Sims, A Clean Energy Deployment Administration: The Right Policy for Emerging Renewable Technologies, 31 Energy L.J. 397 (2010); Committee Report: International Energy Law and Transactions Committee, 33 Energy L.J. 285 (2012)).
  • Lincoln L. Davies, State Renewable Portfolio Standards: Is There A "Race" and Is It "To the Top"?, 3 San Diego J. Climate & Energy L. 3 (2012) (citing Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2008); Mary Ann Ralls, Congress Got It Right: There's No Need To Mandate Renewable Portfolio Standards, 27 Energy L.J. 451 (2006)).
  • Christi Davis & Douglas M. Branson, Interstate Compacts in Commerce and Industry: A Proposal for "Common Markets Among States",23 Vt. L. Rev. 133 (1998) (citing Frank P. Darr, Electric Holding Company Regulation by Multistate Compact, 14 Energy L.J. 357 (1993)).
  • P.J.M. Declercq, Modern Analysis of the Legal Effect of Force Majeure Clauses in Situations of Commercial Impracticability,15 J.L. & Com. 213 (1995) (citing Randall L. Sarosdy, May Acid Rain Legislation Excuse Performance Obligations Under Coal Contracts?, 14 Energy L.J. 303 (1993)).
  • Cristian Defrancia, Note, Local Competition and Telecommunications Convergence: Gauging the Need for New Legislation, 17 J.L. & Pol. 739 (2001) (citing Vicky A. Bailey, Reassessing the Role of Regulators of Competitive Energy Markets, or: Walking the Walk of Competition, 20 Energy L.J. 5 (1999)).  
  • Darci Deltorto, Note, Pole Position: National Cable & Telecommunications Ass’n v. Gulf Power Co. and the Implications of the FCC’s Pole Attachments Act Reaching Higher Ground  (citing Elizabeth B. Dickerson, Note, Effect of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 on Access to Electric and Gas Utilities Rights-of-Way, 22 Energy L.J. 361, 362 (2001)).
  • William F. Demarest, Jr. & Elisabeth R. Myers, Construction of New Midstream Infrastructure: Perils and Pitfalls of Federal Regulatory Jurisdiction, 56 Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation Institute 28-1 (2010) (citing Christopher J. Barr, Growing Pains: FERC's Responses to Challenges to the Development of Oil Pipeline Infrastructure, 28 Energy L.J. 43 (2007)).
  • Robert J. Denicola, Harnessing the Power of the Ground Beneath Our Feet: Encouraging Greater Installation of Geothermal Heat Pumps in the Northeast United States, 38 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 115 (2013) (citing Envtl. Regulation Comm., Energy Bar Ass'n, Report of the Environmental Regulation Committee, 32 Energy L.J. 637 (2011)).
  • Jeffery S. Dennis, Twenty-Five Years of Electricity Law, Policy, and Regulation, 25 Natural Res. & Envt 33 (Summer 2010) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995); John T. Miller, Jr., Conscripting State Regulatory Authorities in a Federal Electric Rate Regulatory Scheme: A Goal of PURPA Partially Realized, 4 Energy L.J. 77 (1983)).
  • Joshua P. Dennis, The Emergence of Natural Gas and the Need for Cooperative Federalism to Address A Big "Fracking" Problem, 4 San Diego J. Climate & Energy L. 253 (2013) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008); James M. Inhofe & Frank Fannon, Energy and the Environment: The Future of Natural Gas in America, 26 Energy L.J. 349 (2005)).
  • Victor K. Der, Carbon Capture and Storage: An Option for Helping to Meet Growing Global Energy Demand While Countering Climate Change, 44 U. Rich. L. Rev. 937 (2010) (citing Robert R. Nordhaus & Emily Pitlick, Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Regulation, 30 Energy L.J. 85 (2009); William L. Massey et al., Reliability-Based Competition in Wholesale Electricity: Legal and Policy Perspectives, 25 Energy L.J. 319 (2004)).
  • John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change and Carbon Sequestration: Assessing a Liability Regime for Long-Term Storage of Carbon Dioxide, 58 Emory L.J. 103 (2008) (citing Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007)).
  • John C. Dernbach & Seema M. Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1, 31+ (2008) (citing Giovanna Golini, Tradable Green Certificate Systems in the E.U., 26 Energy L.J. 111 (2005)).
  • John C. Dernbach & Seema M. Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1, 31 (2008) (citing Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007)).
  • Charles de Saillan, Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel in the United States and Europe: A Persistent Environmental Problem, 34 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 461 (2010) (citing Roland M. Frye, Jr., The Current “Nuclear Renaissance” in the United States, Its Underlying Reasons, and Its Potential Pitfalls, 29 Energy L.J. 279 (2008)).
  • J.R. DeShazo & Jody Freeman, Public Agencies as Lobbyists, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 2217 (2005) (citing Melissa Powell, Note, A Case Study for Stakeholders: An Alternative to Traditional Hydroelectric Relicensing, 18 Energy L.J. 405 (1997); John D. Echeverria, The Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986, 8 Energy L.J. 61 (1987)).
  • Mark Detsky, Notes & Comments, The Global Light: An Analysis of International and Local Developments in the Solar Electric Industry and Their Lessons for United States Energy Policy, 14 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 301 (2003) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995)).
  • Michael Diamond, "Energized” Negotiations: Mediating Disputes over the Siting of Interstate Electric Transmission Lines, 26 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 217 (2011) (citing Debbie Swanstrom & Meredith M. Jolivert, DOE Transmission Corridor Designations & FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities?, 30 Energy L.J. 415 (2009); Jacob Dweck, David Wochner & Michael Brooks, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006)).
  • Kathryn Lee Dietrich, Comment, Saving the States from Unsuitable Plaintiffs: Uncovering the Lack of Standing in Challengers to State Income Tax Credits for Business Developments, 36 Cumb. L. Rev. 343 (2005-2006) (citing Jennifer L. Walls, Note, Supreme Court Standing Requirements: Has Wyoming v. Oklahoma Set the Stage for Future Conflict?, 14 Energy L.J. 153 (1993)).
  • Sandra DiFranco, Note, Denying Medical Staff Privileges Based On Economic Credentials, 15 J.L. & Health 247 (2000-2001) (citing William B. Tye, Competitive Access:A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).  
  • Holly Doremus & W. Michael Hanemann, Of Babies and Bathwater: Why the Clean Air Act's Cooperative Federalism Framework Is Useful for Addressing Global Warming, 50 Ariz. L. Rev. 799 (2008) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • Eric H. Dorf, Energy, 55 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 862 (May/Aug 1987) (citing Puckett, The 'Fraud, Abuse, or Similar Grounds' Exception Under Section 601(c)(2) of the NGPA, 6 Energy L.J. 59 (1985)).
  • Kevin L. Doran & Angela M. Cifor, Does the Federal Government Own the Pore Space Under Private Lands in the West? Implications of the Stock-Raising Homestead Act of 1916 for Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide, 42 Envtl. L. 527 (2012) (citing Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008)).
  • Michael S. Dorsi, Piedmont Environmental Council v. FERC, 34 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 593 (2010) (citing Debbie Swanstrom & Meredith M. Jolivert, DOE Transmission Corridor Designations & FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities?, 30 Energy L.J. 415 (2009)).
  • Daniel Doty, Crushing Europe's Pipeline Dreams: Russia's Mineral Monopoly, Weakness in the European Energy Market, and Realism in the Future, 37 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 759 (2013) (citing Pekka Voutilainen, Developing Energy Policy for Europe: A Finnish Perspective on Energy Cooperation in the European Union, 29 Energy L.J. 121 (2008)).
  • Ryan David Dreveskracht, Native Nation Economic Development Via the Implementation of Solar Projects: How to Make It Work, 68 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 27 (2011) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008)).
  • David M. Driesen, The Societal Cost of Environmental Regulation: Beyond Administrative Cost-Benefit Analysis, 24 Ecology L.B. 545 (1997) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, Purpa: the Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995)).
  • Ann E. Drobot, Transitioning to a Sustainable Energy Economy: The Call for National Cooperative Watershed Planning, 41 Envtl. L. 707 (2011) (citing Benjamin K. Sovacool, Running on Empty: The Electricity-Water Nexus and the U.S. Electric Utility Sector, 30 Energy L.J. 11 (2009)).
  • Richard A. Drom, New Metrics for Measuring the Success of a Non-Profit RTO, 28 Energy L.J. 603, 630+ (2007) (citing Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007)).
  • Deborah W. Duckett, Note, Survey of Current Public Utility Issues in Texas: The Impact of PURPA on Texas Regulations Requiring Wheeling for Qualifying Facilities,12 T. Marshall L. Rev. 213 (1986) (citing Tiano & Zimmer, Wheeling For Cogeneration and Small Power  Production, 3 Energy L.J. 95 (1982)).
  • James A. Duffield et al., Ethanol Policy: Past, Present, and Future, 53 S.D. L. Rev. 425 (2008) (citing Kaylan Lytle, Driving the Market: The Effects on the United States Ethanol Industry if the Foreign Ethanol Tariff is Lifted, 28 Energy L.J. 693 (2007)).
  • Robert Dufresne, The Opacity of Oil: Oil Corporations, Internal Violence, and International Law, 36 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 331 (2004) (citing Eric Marcks, Avoiding Liability for Human Rights Violations in Project Finance, 22 Energy L.J. 301 (2001)).
  • Laura Duos, Comment, Order 888: Has the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Invaded the States' Jurisdictional Territory?,54 Admin. L. Rev. 1213 (2002) (citing Curt L. Hebert, Jr., The Quest for an Inventive Utility Regulatory Agenda, 19 Energy L.J. 1 (1998); Robert J. Michaels, The Governance of Transmission Operators, 20 Energy L.J. 233 (1999); William H. Penniman & Paul B. Turner, A Jurisdictional Clash over Electricity Transmission: Northern States Power v. FERC, 20 Energy L.J. 205 (1999)).
  • Emeka Duruigbo, The Global Energy Challenge and Nigeria's Emergence as a Major Gas Power: Promise, Peril or Paradox of Plenty?, 21 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev. 395 (2009) (citing Yuli Grigoryev, The Russian Gas Industry, Its Legal Structure, and Its Influence on World Markets, 28 Energy L.J. 125 (2007); Monika Ehrman, Competition Is a Sin: An Evaluation of the Formation and Effects of Natural Gas OPEC, 27 Energy L.J. 175 (2006)).
  • Emeka Duruigbo, Oil, Turmoil, and A Texas Export for Energy Security, 37 T. Marshall L. Rev. 231 (2012) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The Bell Tolls for Hydrocarbons: What's Next?, 29 Energy L.J. 381 (2008); Pekka Voutilainen, Developing Energy Policy for Europe: A Finnish Perspective on Energy Cooperation in the European Union, 29 Energy L.J. 121 (2008); Carlos Padros & Endrius E. Cocciolo, Security of Energy Supply: When Could National Policy Take Precedence Over European Law? 31 Energy L.J. 31 (2010); Monika Ehrman, Competition Is a Sin: An Evaluation of the Formation and Effects of a Natural Gas OPEC, 27 Energy L.J. 175 (2006); Alastair R. Lucas, Canada's Role in the United States' Oil and Gas Supply Security: Oil Sands, Arctic Gas, NAFTA, and Canadian Kyoto Protocol Impacts, 25 Energy L.J. 403 (2004); Senator James M. Inhofe & Frank Fannon, Energy and the Environment: The Future of Natural Gas in America, 26 Energy L.J. 349, (2005)
  • KK DuVivier, Fuel Cycle to Nowhere: Us Law and Policy on Nuclear Waste Richard Burleson Stewart and Jane Bloom Stewart Vanderbilt University Press, 2011; 446 Pages; $75 (Hardback); Isbn 978 0826517746, 30 J. Energy & Nat. Resources L. 337 (2012) (citing Roland M Frye Jr, ‘The Current Nuclear Renaissance in the United States, Its Underlying Reasons, and its Potential Pitfalls' 29 Energy LJ 279 (2008)).
  • Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel Aslin Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543, 601+ (2007) (citing John S. Moot, Economic Theories of Regulation and Electricity Restructuring, 25 Energy L.J. 273 (2004)).
  • Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel Aslin Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543, 601+ (2007) (citing Hon. Suedeen Kelly, Maria F. Vouras & Jennifer S. Amerkhail, The Subdelegation Doctrine and the Application of Reference Prices in Mitigating Market Power, 26 Energy L.J. 297 (2005)).
  • Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel Aslin Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543, 601 (2007) (citing John S. Moot, Whither Order No. 888, 26 Energy L.J. 327 (2005)).
  • Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel Aslin Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543, 601 (2007) (citing Clinton A. Vance, Sherry A. Quirk, Stanley P. Wolf, Travis R. Smith, Sandra Barbulescu & Monica Berry, What is Happening and Where in the World of RTOs and ISOs?, 27 Energy L.J. 65 (2006)).
  • Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel Aslin Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543, 601 (2007) (citing Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007)).
  • Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel Aslin Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543, 601 (2007) (citing William H. Smith, Jr., Formation and Nurture of a Regional State Committee, 28 Energy L.J. 185 (2007)).
  • Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel Aslin Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543, 601 (2007) (citing Hon. Jon Wellinghoff & David L. Morenoff, Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation, 28 Energy L.J. 389 (2007)).
  • Gary J. Edles, Has Steelworkers Burst Chevron's Bubble? Some Practical Implications of Judicial Deference,10 Rev. Litig. 695 (1991) (citing Nelson, The Chevron Deference Rule and Judicial Review of FERC Orders, 9 Energy L.J. 59 (1988)).
  • Sonnet C. Edmonds, Commentary, Retail Electric Competition in Kansas: A Utility Perspective, 37 Washburn L.J. 603 (1998) (citing Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995); Walter R. Hall II, Securitization and Stranded Cost Recovery, 18 Energy L.J. 363 (1997)).
  • Dylan Charles Edwards, Admissions Online: Statements of A Party Opponent in the Internet Age, 65 Okla. L. Rev. 533 (2013) (citing Carolyn Elefant, The “Power” of Social Media: Legal Issues & Best Practices for Utilities Engaging Social Media, 32 Energy L.J. 1 (2011)).
  • Monika Ehrman, Moving the Molecules to Market: An Introduction to Hydrocarbon Processing and Transportation, 2011 No. 1 Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation Institute PAPER NO. 2 (2011) (citing Monika Ehrman, Competition is a Sin: The Evaluation and Effects of a Natural Gas OPEC, 27 Energy L.J. 175 (2006)).
  • Joel B. Eisen, Can Urban Solar Become a "Disruptive" Technology?: The Case for Solar Utilities, 24 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 53 (2010) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L J. 49 (2008); Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2008)).
  • Joel B. Eisen, China’s Greentech Programs and the USTR Investigation, 11 Sustainable Dev. L. & Pol'y 3 (2011) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008)).
  • Joel B. Eisen, Distributed Energy Resources, "Virtual Power Plants," and the Smart Grid, 7 Envt'l & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 191 (2012) (citing Jon Wellinghoff & David L. Morenof, Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation, 28 Energy L.J. 389 (2007); Jon Wellinghoff & David L. Morenof, Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation, 28 Energy L.J. 389, 392 (2007); Energy Bar Association, Report of the Demand-Side Resources & Smart Grid Committee, 33 Energy L. J. 213 (2012)).
  • Joel B. Eisen, The New Energy Geopolitics?: China, Renewable Energy, and the "Greentech Race", 86 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 9 (2011) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008)).
  • Joel B. Eisen, The Environmental Responsibility of the Regionalizing Electric Utility Industry, 15 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol'y F. 295, 314 (2005) (citing Donald F. Santa, Jr. & Clifford S. Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 25 Energy L.J. 113 (2004)).
  • Joel B. Eisen, Smart Regulation and Federalism for the Smart Grid, 37 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 1 (2013) (citing Carolyn Elefant, The “Power” of Social Media: Legal Issues & Best Practice For Utilities Engaging Social Media, 32 Energy L.J. 1 (2011); William P. Boswell & James P. Cargas, North American Energy Standards Board: Legal and Administrative Underpinnings of a Consensus Based Organization, 27 Energy L.J. 147 (2006); Energy Bar Association Panel Discussing the Smart Grid, 31 Energy L.J. 81 (2009)).
  • Joel B. Eisen, Who Regulates the Smart Grid?: Ferc's Authority over Demand Response Compensation in Wholesale Electricity Markets, 4 San Diego J. Climate & Energy L. 69 (2013) (citing Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel Aslin Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543 (2007)).
  • Electricity, 11 Winter Nat. Resources & Env’t 56 (1997) (reviewing J.W. Moeller, Requiem for the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935: The 'Old' Federalism and State Regulation of Inter-State Holding Companies, 17 Energy L.J. 343 (1996)).
  • Einer Elhauge, Preference-Estimating Statutory Default Rules, 102 Colum. L. Rev. 2027 (2002) (Citing Jerome Nelson, The Chevron Deference Rule and Judicial Review of FERC Orders, 9 Energy L.J. 59 (1988)).
  • E. Donald Elliott, Why the United States Does Not Have A Renewable Energy Policy, 43 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10095 (2013)  (citing Richard J. Pierce, The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994)).
  • 20 ELR 10448  Environmental Protection Through Federal Preemption of State Water Laws  Environmental Law Reporter, October 1990 (citing Echeverria, The Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986, 8 Energy L.J. 61 (1987)).   
  • 29 ELR 10003  The Common-Law Impetus for Advanced Control of Air Toxics  Environmental Law Reporter, January, 1999 (citing  Mark W. Ciaravella, Regulation of Hazardous Air Pollutants Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 15 Energy L.J. 485, 494 (1994)).    
  • 30 ELR 10933, Moving the Climate Change Debate from Models to Proposed Legislation: Lessons from State Experience, Environmental Law Reporter  Article  November, 2000 (citing Ajay Gupta, Tracking Stranded Costs, 21 Energy L.J. 113, 114 (2000)).
  • Christine Elwell & Grant Boyle, Friends of the Earth v. the Minister of the Environment: Does CEPA 166 Require Canada to Meet its Kyoto Commitments?, 18 J. of Envtl. L. & Practice (Canada) 253 (2008) (citing Alastair Lucas, Canada's Role in the US' Oil and Gas Supply Security: Oil Sands, Arctic Gas, NAFTA and Canadian Kyoto Protocol Impacts, 25 Energy L.J. 403 (2004)).
  • Brian Elwood,Raponos v. United States: The Supreme Court's Failed Attempt to Interpret Wetland Regulation Under the Clean Water Act, 56 Cath. U. L. Rev. 1343, 1372+ (2007) (citing Jeremy Ward, Note, If It’s Worth a Dam, It’s “Navigable Waters”: A Proposed Revision of Section 3(8) of the FPA Derived from Decisions Followed in FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC v. FERC, 26 Energy L.J. 179 (2005)).
  • A. Bryan Endres, Geologic Carbon Sequestration: Balancing Efficiency Concerns and Public Interest in Property Rights Allocations, 2011 U. Ill. L. Rev. 623 (2011) (citing Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008)).
  • Kirsten H. Engel, The Dormant Commerce Clause Threat to Market-Based Environmental Regulation: The Case of Electricity Deregulation, 26 Ecology L.B. 243 (1999) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994); Robert L. Bradley, The  Origins of Political Electricity: Market Failure or Political Opportunism?, 17 Energy L.J. 59 (1996)).
  • Richard D. English, Energy in the NAFTA: Free Trade Confronts Mexico's Constitution, 1 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 1 (1993) (citing Shelly P. Battram & Reinier H. Lock, The Canada/United States Free Trade Agreement and Trade in Energy, 9 Energy L.J. 327 (1988)).
  • Gregory D. Eriksen, Breaking Wind, Fixing Wind: Facilitating Wind Energy Development in New York State, 60 Syracuse L. Rev. 189 (2009) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • Deborah K. Espinosa, Comment, Environmental Regulation of Russia's Offshore Oil & Gas Industry and Its Implications for the International Petroleum Market, 6 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J. 647 (1997) (citing Thomas W. Wälde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Maria Angelica Espinosa, Note, The Colombian Royalty System: How Flexibility in Law-Making Generates Investment, 9 L. & Bus. Rev. Ams. 189 (2003) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Craig Estlinbaum, Social Networking and Judicial Ethics, 2 St. Mary's J. Legal Mal. & Ethics 2 (2012) (citing Carolyn Elefant, The “Power” of Social Media: Legal Issues & Best Practices for Utilities Engaging Social Media, 32 Energy L.J. 1 (2011)).
  • Danieli Evans, Concrete Private Interest in Regulatory Enforcement: Tradable Environmental Resource Rights As A Basis for Standing, 29 Yale J. on Reg. 201 (2012) (citing Douglas O. Waikart, Report of the Committee on the Environment, 19 Energy L.J. 181 (1998); Report of the Committee on the Environment, 19 Energy L.J. 181 (1998)).
  • Justin W. Evans, A New Energy Paradigm for the Twenty-First Century: China, Russia, and America’s Triangular Security Strategy, 39 Ind. L. Rev. 627 (2006) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Maria C. Faconti, How Texas Overcame California As A Renewable State: A Look at the Texan Renewable Energy Success, 14 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 411 (2013) (citing Energy Bar Association, Committee Report: Report of the State Commission Practice & Regulation Committee, 30 Energy L. J. 765 (2009)).
  • Joseph Fagan, Symposium,  From Regulation to Deregulation: The Diminishing Role of the Small Consumer Within the Natural Gas Industry, 29 Tulsa L.J. 707 (1994) (citing F. Lindh, Federal Preemption of State Regulation in the Field of Electricity and Natural Gas: A Supreme Court Chronicle, 10 Energy L.J. 277 (1989)).
  • Miles B. Farmer, Mandatory and Fair? A Better System of Mandatory Arbitration, 121 Yale L.J. 2346 (2012) (citing Ren Orans, C.K. Woo & William Clayton, Benchmarking the Price Reasonableness of a Long-Term Electricity Contract, 25 Energy L.J. 357 (2004)).
  • John E. Farren, Ohio Edison v. Public Utility Commission of Ohio: Affirming the Charitable and Municipal Exception to the Policy Against Anti-Competitive Behavior, 31 Akron L. Rev. 297 (1997) (citing John Wyeth Griggs, Competitive Bidding and Independent Power Producers: Is Deregulation Coming to the Electric Utility Industry?, 9 Energy L.J. 415 (1988); Floyd L. Norton IV & Mark R. Spivak, The Wholesale Service Obligation of Electric Utility, 62 Energy L.J. 179 (1985)).
  • Murray D. Feldman, Note, National Wildlife Federation v. FERC and Washington State Department of Fisheries v. FERC: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Ignores Ninth Circuit Rebuke on Hydropower Permitting, 15 Ecology L.B. 319 (1988) (citing Echeverria, The Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986, 8 Energy L.J. 61 (1987)).   
  • Nicholas W. Fels & David N. Heap, 52 Fordham L. Rev. 219 (1983) (citing Tiano & Zimmer,  Wheeling for Cogeneration and Small Power Production Facilities, 3 Energy L.J. 95 (1982); Pace & Landon, Introducing Competition into the Electric Utility Industry: An Economic Appraisal, 3 Energy L.J. 1 (1982)).  
  • FERC Manipulation Authority (2008), Deregulating the Electricity Market, (citing Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 373 (2006)).
  • Lee Anne Fennell, Lumpy Property, 160 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1955 (2012) (citing William J. Baumol & J. Gregory Sidak, The Pig in the Python: Is Lumpy Capacity Investment Used and Useful?, 23 Energy L.J. 383 (2002)).
  • Natalie J. Ferrall, Concerted Activity and Social Media: Why Facebook Is Nothing Like the Proverbial Water Cooler, 40 Pepp. L. Rev. 1001 (2013) (citing Carolyn Elefant, The “Power” of Social Media: Legal Issues & Best Practices for Utilities Engaging Social Media, 32 Energy L.J. 1 (2011)).
  • Steven J. Ferrey, Shaping American Power:  Federal Preemption and Technological Change, 11 Va. Envtl. L.J. 47 (1991) (citing Tiano & Zimmer, Wheeling for Cogeneration and Small Power Production Facilities, 3 Energy L.J. 95 (1982)).  
  • Steven Ferry, Law of Independent Power (2008) (citing Anthony Allen, Comment, The Legal Impediments to Distributed Generation, 23 Energy L.J. 505 (2002)).
  • Steven Ferry, Law of Independent Power (2011) (citing Anthony Allen, Comment, The Legal Impediments to Distributed Generation, 23 Energy L.J. 505 (2002)).
  • Joshua P. Fershee, Moving Power Forward: Creating a Forward-Looking Energy Policy Based on a National RPS, 42 Conn. L. Rev. 1405 (2010) (citing Markian M.W. Melnyk & William S. Lamb, PUHCA's Gone: What Is Next for Holding Companies?, 27 Energy L.J. 1 (2006)).
  • Joshua P. Fershee, Struggling Past Oil: The Infrastructure Impediments to Adopting Next-Generation Transportation Fuel Sources, 40 Cumb. L. Rev. 87 (2010) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The Bell Tolls for Hydrocarbons: What's Next?, 29 Energy L.J. 381 (2008)).
  • Joshua P. Fershee, The North Dakota Publicly Traded Corporations Act: A Branding Initiative Without a (North Dakota) Brand, 84 N.D. L. Rev. 1085 (2008) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008)).
  • Joshua P. Fershee, When Prayer Trumps Politics: The Politics and Demographics of Renewable Portfolio Standards, 35 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 53 (2010) (citing Ronald E. Minsk, Sam P. Ori & Sabrina Howell, Plugging Cars into the Grid: Why the Government Should Make a Choice, 30 Energy L.J. 317 (2009); Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2009)).
  • Joshua Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49, 77+ (2008) (citing Mary Ann Ralls, Congress Got it Right: There’s No Need to Mandate Renewable Portfolio, 27 Energy L.J. 451 (2006)).
  • Joshua Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49, 77+ (2008) (citing Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007)).
  • Joshua Fershee, Levels of Green: State and Regional Efforts, in Wyoming and Beyond, to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 7 Wyo. L. Rev. 269, 293 (2007) (citing Monica Berry, Liquefied Natural Gas Import Terminals: Jurisdiction of Siting, Constructing, and Operation in the Context of Commerce Clause Jurisprudence, 26 Energy L.J. 135 (2005)).
  • Joshua Fershee, Levels Of Green: State and Regional Efforts, in Wyoming and Beyond, to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 7 Wyo. L. Rev. 269, 293 (2007) (citing Clinton A. Vance, Sherry A. Quirk, Stanley P. Wolf, Travis R. Smith, Sandra Barbulescu & Monica Berry, What is Happening and Where in the World of RTOs and ISOs?, 27 Energy L.J. 65 (2006)).
  • Joshua Fershee, Levels of Green: State and Regional Efforts, in Wyoming and Beyond, to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 7 Wyo. L. Rev. 269, 293 (2007) (citing Jacob Dweck, David Wochner & Michael Brooks, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006)).
  • Joshua P. Fershee, Misguided Energy: Why Recent Legislative, Regulatory, and Market Initiatives are Insufficient to Improve the U.S. Energy Infrastructure, 44 Harv. J. on Legis. 327, 362 (2007) (citing Hon. Joseph T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, And the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1(2005)).
  • Joshua P. Fershee, Misguided Energy: Why Recent Legislative, Regulatory, and Market Initiatives are Insufficient to Improve the U.S. Energy Infrastructure, 44 Harv. J. on Legis. 327, 362 (2007) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise And Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Joshua P. Fershee, Misguided Energy: Why Recent Legislative, Regulatory, and Market Initiatives are Insufficient to Improve the U.S. Energy Infrastructure, 44 Harv. J. on Legis. 327, 362+ (2007) (citing Monica Berry, Liquefied Natural Gas Import Terminals: Jurisdiction of Siting, Constructing, And Operation in the Context of Commerce Clause Jurisprudence, 26 Energy L.J. 135 (2005)).
  • Joshua P. Fershee, Misguided Energy: Why Recent Legislative, Regulatory, and Market Initiatives are Insufficient to Improve the U.S. Energy Infrastructure, 44 Harv. J. on Legis. 327, 362 (2007) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, 70th Anniversary Celebration of the Federal Power Act, 26 Energy L.J. 389 (2005)).
  • Joshua P. Fershee, Misguided Energy: Why Recent Legislative, Regulatory, and Market Initiatives are Insufficient to Improve the U.S. Energy Infrastructure, 44 Harv. J. on Legis. 327, 362 (2007) (citing Markian M.W. Melnyk & William S. Lamb, PUHCA’s Gone: What is Next for Holding Companies?, 27 Energy L.J. 1 (2006)).
  • Joshua P. Fershee, Promoting an All of the Above Approach or Pushing (Oil) Addiction and Abuse?: The Curious Role of Energy Subsidies and Mandates in U.S. Energy Policy, 7 Envt'l & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 125 (2012) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008)).
  • Donna M. Fettuccia, Note, FERC v. Martin Exploration Management Co.: Proper Price Treatment for Dual-Qualified Natural Gas, 38 Cath. U. L. Rev. 213 (1988) (citing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Toni M. Fine, Multiple Petitions for Review of Agency Rulings: A Call for Further Reform, 31 New Eng. L. Rev. 43 (1996) (citing Nicholas W. Fels, Beyond the Stopwatch: Determining Appellate Venue on Review of FERC Orders, 1 Energy L.J. 35 (1980)).
  • Jill Fisch, Measuring Efficiency in Corporate Law: The Role of Shareholder Primacy, 31 J. Corp. L. 637 (2006) (citing Leonard S. Hyman, Investing in the "Plain Vanilla" Utility, 24 Energy L.J. 1 (2003)).
  • Jerry R. Fish et al., Geologic Carbon Sequestration: Property Rights and Regulation, 54 Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation Institute 3-1 (2008) (citing Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestation of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007)).
  • Stephen M. Fisher, Reforming Interconnection Queue Management Under FERC Order No. 2003, 26 Yale J. on Reg. 117 (2009) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007); Jackie S. Levinson & Andrew D. Schifrin, Regulatory and Tax Treatment of Electric Interconnection Facilities, 23 Energy L.J. 459 (2002)).
  • Edward A. Fitzgerald,Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Isolated Waters, Migratory Birds, Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation, 43 Nat. Resources J. 11 (2003) (citing Stephen Jay Stokes, The Limit of Government's Regulatory Authority over Non-Adjacent Wetlands: Hoffman Homes, Inc. v. EPA, 15 Energy L.J. 137 (1994)).
  • Robert B. Fitzpatrick, Company-Issued Laptops/Cell Phones and Waivers of the Attorney-Client Privilege, ST001 American Law Institute-American Bar Association 2817 (2011) (citing Carolyn Elefant, The “Power” of Social Media: Legal Issues & Best Practices for Utilities Engaging in Social Media, 32 Energy L. J. 1 (2011)).
  • Victor B. Flatt, "Offsetting" Crisis?-Climate Change Cap-and-Trade Need Not Contribute to Another Financial Meltdown, 39 Pepp. L. Rev. 619 (2012) (citing Robert J. Carpenter, Implementation of Biological Sequestration Offsets in a Carbon Reduction Policy: Answers to Key Questions for a Successful Domestic Offset Program, 31 Energy L.J. 157 (2010)).
  • Victor B. Flatt, Paving the Legal Path for Carbon Sequestration from Coal, 19 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol'y F. 211 (2009) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008); Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007)).
  • Victor B. Flatt, What is the Best Formulat to Protect the Environment in Electricity Restructuring? Comment on The Environmental Impacts of Electricity Restructuring by Karen Palmer and Dallas Burtraw, 1 Envtl. & Energy L. & Pol’y 221 (2005) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, Intermittent Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Jessica E. Fliegelman, The Next Generation of Greenwash: Diminishing Consumer Confusion Through a National Eco-Labeling Program, 37 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1001 (2010) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction,29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • Michael Fleming, Municipal Law, 18 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 251 (1992) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Lawrence Flint, Comment, Shaping Nuclear Waste Policy at the Juncture of Federal and State Law, 28 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 163 (2000) (citing Michael A. Bauser, Recent Decisions Concerning DOE's Commercial Radioactive Waste Disposal Program, 19 Energy L.J. 387 (1998)).
  • Lawrence Fogel, Serving a "Public Function": Why Regional Cap-and-Trade Programs Should Survive a Dormant Commerce Clause Challenge, 2010 Wis. L. Rev. 1313 (2010) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • Elizabeth B. Forsyth, Education for Reenergization: Overcoming Behavioral Barriers to Energy Efficiency in the Residential Sector, 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11030 (2011) (citing Neil Peretz, Growing the Energy Efficiency Market Through Third-Party Financing, 30 Energy L.J. 377 (2009)).
  • Fortieth Selected Bibliography on Computers, Technology and the Law, 35 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 296 (2009) (citing Roland M. Frye, The Current “Nuclear Renaissance” in the United States, it's Underlying Reasons, and its Potential Pitfalls, 29 Energy L.J. 279 (2008); Hon. Jon Wellinghoff, James Pederson & David L. Morenoff, Facilitating Hydrokinetic Energy Development Through Regulatory Innovation, 29 Energy L.J. 397 (2008); Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008)).
  • Seth Fortin, The Two-Tiered Program of the Tribal Law and Order Act, 61 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 88 (2013) (citing Ryan D. Dreveskracht, Alternative Energy in American Indian Country: Catering to Both Sides of the Coin, 33 Energy L.J. 431 (2012)).
  • Lynn M. Fountain, Johnny-Come-Lately: Practical Considerations of a National RPS, 42 Conn. L. Rev. 1475 (2010) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2008)).
  • William F. Fox, Jr., Transforming an Industry by Agency Rulemaking: Regulation of Natural Gas by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 23 Land & Water L. Rev. 113 (1988) (citing Tiano & Bonnifield, The Impact on Gas Distribution Companies of Federally Approved Special Marketing Programs, 5 Energy L.J. 287 (1985); Nowak & Leitch, Maryland People's Counsel: Will It Spur Changes in FERC's Regulation of the Natural Gas Industry?, 6 Energy L.J. 265 (1986); Williams, The Proposed Sea-Change in Natural Gas Regulation, 6 Energy L.J. 233 (1985)).
  • Brett Friedman et al., Recent Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: Administrative Law, 74 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 619 (2006) (citing Paul B. Mohler, Experiments at the FERC--In Search of a Hypothesis, 19 Energy L.J. 281 (1998)).
  • H. Russell Frisby, Jr. & David A. Irwin, The First Great Telecom Debate of the 21st Century, 15 Comm. Law Conspectus 373, 399 (2007) (citing Peter Navarro & Michael Shames, Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned from California, 24 Energy L.J. 23 (2003)).
  • Roland M. Frye, Jr., Restricted Communications at the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 59 Admin. L. Rev. 315 (2007) (citing Stephen R. Melton, Separation of Functions at the FERC: Does the Reorganization of the Office of General Counsel Mean What It Says?, 5 Energy L.J. 349 (1984)).
  • William F. Funk, Symposium, To Preserve Meaningful Judicial Review, 49 Admin. L. Rev. 171 (1997) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • John B. Gaffneyk, Note, What Blight Through Yonder Window Breaks?: A Survey of the Environmental Implications of Electric Utility Deregulation in Connecticut, 32 Conn. L. Rev. 1443 (2000) (citing Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347, 350 (1995)).
  • S. Scott Gaille, The Use of Quantity Terms to Improve Efficiency and Stability in International Gas Sales & Purchase Agreements, 29 Energy L.J. 645 (2008) (citing Philip M. Marston, Pipeline Restructuring: The Future of Open-Access Transportation, 12 Energy L.J. (1991)).
  • Jonathan Galst, Note, "Phony" Intent?:  An Examination Of Regulatory-Preemption Jurisprudence, 67 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 108 (1992) (citing Clinton  A. Vince & John S. Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation in a Post-Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989)).
  • José Antonio García & William B. Tye, Who Pays, Who Benefits, and Adequate Investment in Natural Gas Infrastructure , 28 Energy L.J. 1, 42+ (2007) (citing Jeffrey M. Petrash, Long-Term Natural Gas Contracts: Dead, Dying, or Merely Resting?, 27 Energy L.J. 545 (2006)).
  • Jennifer E. Gardner, Ronald L. Lehr, Wind Energy in the West: Transmission, Operations, and Market Reforms,  26-WTR Nat. Resources & Env't, Winter 13 (2012) (citing Darrel Blakeway & Carol Brotman White, Tapping the Power of Wind: FERC Initiatives to Facilitate Transmission of Wind Power, 26 Energy L.J. 393 (2005)).
  • Tracy Gellert, Notes, The Pacificorp Acquisition: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Asserts Authority to Condition Merger Approval, 11 J. Energy Nat. Resources & Envtl. L. 391 (1991) (citing Norton & Early, Limitations on the Obligation to Provide Access to Electric Transmission and Distribution Lines, 5 Energy L.J. 47 (1984)).
  • Michael J. Gergen, George D. Cannon, Jr. & David G. Tewksbury, Market-Based Ratemaking and the Western Energy Crisis of 2000 and 2001, 24 Energy L.J. 321, 348 (2003) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets to Set Electric Rates?, 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003)).
  • Michael J. Gergen et al., Market-Based Ratemaking and the Western Energy Crisis of 2000 and 2001, 24 Energy L.J. 321 (2003) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the “Perfect Storm,” 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001)).
  • Daniel Gervais, The Regulation of Inchoate Technologies, 47 Hous. L. Rev. 665 (2010) (citing Janice A. Beecher, The Prudent Regulator: Politics, Independence, Ethics, and the Public Interest, 29 Energy L.J. 577 (2008)).
  • Christian S. Gerig, Comment  Appalachian Natural Gas and FERC Order 636: The Deregulation Dilemma, 24 Cap. U. L. Rev. 761 (1995) (citing Mark E. Haedicke, Contracts for the New Natural Gas Business, 13 Energy L.J. 313 (1992); Donald F. Santa, Jr. & Patricia J. Beneke, Federal Natural Gas Policy and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, 14 Energy L.J. 1 (1993)).
  • Antony E. Ghee, Ferc Does Not Have Anti-Manipulation Authority in Financial Markets, 18 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 379 (2013) (citing William Demarest, ‘%7FTraditional” NGA Jurisdictional Limits Constrain FERC's Market Manipulation Authority, 31 Energy L.J. 471 (2010); Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 363 (2006)).
  • Daniel J. Gifford & Robert T. Kudrle, The Law and Economics of Price Discrimination in Modern Economies: Time for Reconciliation?, 43 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1235 (2010) (citing Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Retail Electric Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 Energy L.J. 27 (2000)).
  • Michele Estrin Gilman, The President as Scientist-in-Chief, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 565 (2009) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • Douglas H. Ginsburg, Synthetic Competition, 16 Media L. & Pol'y 1, 24 (2006) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Robert L. Glicksman, Coal-Fired Power Plants, Greenhouse Gases, and State Statutory Substantial Endangerment Provisions: Climate Change Comes to Kansas, 56 U. Kan. L. Rev. 517 (2008) (citing Leslie R. Dubois, Comment, Curiosity and Carbon: Examining the Future of Carbon Sequestration and the Accompanying Jurisdictional Issues as Outlined in the Indian Energy Title of the 2005 Energy Policy Act, 27 Energy L.J. 603 (2006)).
  • Robert L. Glicksman, Ecosystem Resilience to Disruptions Linked to Global Climate Change: An Adaptive Approach to Federal Land Management, 87 Neb. L. Rev. 833 (2009) (citing Leslie R. Dubois, Comment, Curiosity and Carbon: Examining the Future of Carbon Sequestration and Accompanying Jurisdictional Issues as Outlined in the Indian Energy Title of the 2005 Energy Policy Act, 27 Energy L.J. 603 (2006)).
  • Robert L. Glicksman, Solar Energy Development on the Federal Public Lands: Environmental Trade-Offs on the Road to A Lower-Carbon Future, 3 San Diego J. Climate & Energy L. 107 (2012) (citing Ronald E. Minsk, Sam P. Ori & Sabrina Howell, Plugging Cars into the Grid: Why the Government Should Make a Choice, 30 Energy L.J. 317 (2009)).
  • Lori Glover, Encouraging Strategic Policy Making in the Climate Change Context: Agencies Should Bear the Burden of Proving That Decisions Not to Prepare A Programmatic Impact Statement Are Reasonable, 43 Rutgers L.J. 371 (2012) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • James E. Goddard, Recent Developments in Texas, United States, and International Energy Law, 6 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L 423 (2011) (citing Ronald A. Misk, Sam P. Ori & Sabrina Howell, Plugging Cars into the Grid: Why the Government Should Make a Choice, 30 Energy L.J. 317 (2009)).
  • Mark D. Godfrey, The Continuing Burden of Short-Sighted Nuclear Waste Policy, 19 J. Envtl. & Sustainability L. 151 (2012) (citing Scott R. Helton, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179 (2002)).
  • Anne Marie Godin, Canada's International Obligations to Provide Energy Under the EIP, GATT, and NAFTA, 1 Great Plains Nat. Resources J. 45 (1996) (citing S. P. Battram & R. H. Lock, The Canada/United States Free-Trade Agreement and Trade in Energy, 9 Energy L.J. 327 1988)).
  • Barry J. Goehler, Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Power Plants, 9 Envtl. Law. 119 (2002) (citing Christie Ingram, Note, Dayton Power v. Browner, 21 Energy L.J. 159 (2000)).
  • Greg Goelzhauser, Price Squeeze in a Deregulated Electric Power Industry, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 225, 228, 232, 235 (2004) (citing Peter Fox-Penner, Gary Taylor, Romkaew Broehm & James Bohn, Competition in Wholesale Electric Power Markets, 23 Energy L.J. 281 (2002)).
  • Greg Goelzhauser, Price Squeeze in a Deregulated Electric Power Industry, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 225, 235 (2004) (citing Peter Navarro & Michael Shames, Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned from California, 24 Energy L.J. 23 (2003)).
  • Greg Goelzhauser, Price Squeeze in a Deregulated Electric Power Industry, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 225, 255 (2004) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets To Set Electric Rates?, 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003)).
  • Greg Goelzhauser, Price Squeeze in a Deregulated Electric Power Industry , 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 225, 255 (2004) (citing Michael J. Gergen, George D. Cannon, Jr. & David G. Tewksbury, Market-Based Ratemaking and the Western Energy Crisis of 2000 and 2001, 24 Energy L.J. 321 (2003)).
  • Greg Goelzhauser, Price Squeeze in a Deregulated Electric Power Industry, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 225 (2004) (citing Richard P. Bonnifield & Ronald L. Drewnowski, Transmission at a Crossroads, 21 Energy L.J. 447 (2000)).
  • Karen Goepfert, For the Long Haul: The Suitability of the Base Contract for the Sale and Purchase of Natural Gas for Long-Term Transactions, 27 Energy L.J. 583, 601+ (2006) (citing William P. Boswell & James P. Cargas, North American Energy Standards Board: Legal and Administrative Underpinnings of a Consensus Based Organization, 27 Energy L.J. 147 (2006)).
  • L. Paul Goeringer, Challenges Under State Law to Wind Energy Facilities and Laws Regulating or Prohibiting Such Facilities, 64 A.L.R.6th 601 (2011) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L. J. 489 (2007)).
  • L. Paul Goeringer et. al., The New Fuel Frontier: Biomass Contracting, 5 Ky. J. Equine, Agric. & Nat. Resources L. 71 (2013) (citing Zachary R. F. Schreiner, Comment, Frankenfuel: Genetically Modified Corn, Ethanol, and Crop Diversity, 30 Energy L. J. 169 (2009)).
  • H. David Gold & Jason Bass, The Energy-Water Nexus: Socioeconomic Considerations and Suggested Legal Reforms in the Southwest, 50 Nat. Resources J. 563 (2010) (citing Benjamin K. Sovacool, Running on Empty: The Electricity-Water Nexus and the U.S. Electric Utility Sector, 30 Energy L.J. 11 (2009); Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007)).
  • Ivan Gold & Nidhi Thakar, A Survey of State Renewable Portfolio Standards: Square Pegs for Round Climate Change Holes?, 35 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 183 (2010) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2007)).
  • Victor P. Goldberg, A Precedent Built on Sand: Norcon v. Niagara Mohawk, 2013 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 38 (2013) (citing Rohit C. Sharma, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. FERC, 23 Energy L.J. 57 (2002)).
  • Aletheia Gooden, The 10,000 Year Guarantee: High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, 26-FALL Environs Envtl. L. & Pol’y J. 95, 120+ (2002) (citing Scott R. Helton, Comment, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179 (2002)).
  • Julia Gorodetsky, Analogy by Necessity: The Filed Rate Doctrine and Judicial Review of Agency Inaction, 23 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 1 (Winter 2009) (citing Nicholas W. Fels & Frank R. Lindh, Lessons from the California “Apocalypse:” Jurisdiction over Electric Utilities, 22 Energy L.J. 1 (2001); Frank P. Darr, Mitigating Costs and the Preemptive Effect of Federal Rate Orders, 13  Energy L.J. 61 (1992)).
  • Alison C. Graab, The Smart Grid: A Smart Solution to a Complicated Problem,52 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2051 (2011) (citing Energy Bar Association Panel Discussing the Smart Grid, 31 Energy L.J. 81 (2010)).
  • Thomas D. Grant, A League of Their Own: The Rationale for an International Alliance of Democracies, 41 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 243 (2009) (citing Yuli Grigoryev, The Russian Gas Industry, Its Legal Structure, and Its Influence on World Markets, 28 Energy L.J. 125 (2001)).
  • Jeffiey McIntyre Gray, Reconciling Market-Based Rates with the Just and Reasonable Standard, 26 Energy L.J. 453, 431 (2005) (citing Peter Fox-Penner, Gary Taylor, Romkaew Broehm & James Bohn, Competition in Wholesale Electric Power Markets, 23 Energy L.J. 281 (2002)).
  • Jeffrey M. Gray, Reconciling Market-Based Rates with the Just and Reasonable Standard, 26 Energy L.J. 423, 435 (2005) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets To Set Electric Rates?, 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003)).
  • Jeffrey McIntyre Gray, Reconciling Market-Based Rates with the Just and Reasonable Standard, 26 Energy L.J. 423, 435 (2005) (citing Peter Navarro & Michael Shames, Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned From California, 24 Energy L.J. 23 (2003)).
  • Jeffrey McIntyre Gray, Reconciling Market-Based Rates with the Just and Reasonable
  • Standard, 26 Energy L.J. 423, 435+ (2005) (citing Hon. Josephy T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, And the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1 (2005)).
  • Hillary Greene, Guideline Institutionalization: The Role of Merger Guidelines in Antitrust Discourse, 48 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 771 (2006) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997); Robert J. Michaels, Market Power in Electric Utility Mergers: Access, Energy, and the Guidelines, 17 Energy L.J. 401 (1996)).
  • Theocharis N. Grigoriadis, State Responsibility and Antitrust in the Energy Charter Treaty: Socialization vs. Liberalization in Bilateral Investment Relations, 44 Tex. Int'l L.J. 45 (2008) (citing Yuri Grigoryev, The Russian Gas Industry, Its Legal Structures and Its Influences on World Markets, 28 Energy L.J. 125 (2007); Thomas Von Danwitz, Regulation and Liberalization of the European Electricity Market: A German View, 27 Energy L.J. 423 (2006)).
  • Lydia T. Grimm, Comment, Fishery Protection and FERC Hydropower Relicensing Under ECPA: Maintaining a Deadly Status Quo, 20 Envtl. L. 929 (1990) (citing Echeverria, The Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986, 8 Energy L.J. 61 (1987)).
  • Todd J. Griset, Harnessing the Ocean’s Power: Opportunities in Renewable Ocean Energy Resources, 16  Ocean & Coastal L.J. 395 (2011) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49, 51 (2008); Hon. Jon Wellinghoff et al., Facilitating Hydro Kinetic Energy Development Through Regulatory Innovation, 29 Energy L.J. 397 (2008); Carolyn Elefant, Ocean Energy Development in the 1990s, 14 Energy L.J. 335 (1993)).
  • Margaret Rosso Grossman, Climate Change and the Law, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 223 (2010) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • John Gulliver & Donald Zillman, Innovative Regulation for Energy and Resources, 52 Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation Institute 2-1 (2006) (citing Joseph T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, and the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1 (2005); Donald F. Santa, Jr. & Clifford S. Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electricity Industry Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?,25 Energy L.J. 113 (1994)).
  • Justin Gundlach, What's the Cost of a New Nuclear Power Plant? The Answer's Gonna Cost You: A Risk-Based Approach to Estimating the Cost of New Nuclear Plants, 18 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 600 (2011) (citing Roland M. Frye, Jr., The Current ‘Nuclear Renaissance’ in the United States, Its Underlying Reasons, and Its Potential Pitfalls, 29 Energy L.J. 279 (2008); William J. Baumol & J. Gregory Sidak, The Pig in the Python: Is Lumpy Capacity Investment Used and Useful?, 23 Energy L.J. 383 (2002)).
  • Randall S. Guttery, Federal Wetlands Regulation: Restrictions on the Nationwide Permit Program and the Implications for Residential Property Owners, 37 Am. Bus. L.J. 299 (2000) (citing Stephen J. Stokes, Note, The Limit of Government's  Regulatory Authority over Non-Adjacent Wetlands: Hoffman Homes, Inc. v. EPA, 15 Energy L.J. 137 (1994).
  • Tyler Hagenbuch, Establishing an Aggressive Legal Framework for the Future of Wind Energy in Europe, 42 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 1595 (2009) (citing Giovanna Golini, Tradable Green Certificate Systems in the E.U., 26 Energy L.J. 111 (2005)).
  • Neil W. Hamilton & Anne M. Caulfield, The Defense of Natural Monopoly in Sherman Act Monopolization Cases, 33 DePaul L. Rev. 465 (1984) (citing Norton & Early, Limitations on the Obligation to Provide Access to Electric Transmission and Distribution Lines, 5 Energy L.J. 47 (1984)).
  • Robert S. Handmaker, Note, Deregulating the Transmission of Electricity: Wheeling Under P.U.R.P.A. Sections 203, 204, and 205,67 Wash. U.L.B. 435 (1989) (citing Small, A FERC Electric Rate Primer, 5 Energy L.J. 197 (1984); Norton & Early, Limitations on the Obligation to Provide Access to Electric Transmission and Distribution Lines, 5 Energy L.J. 47 (1984)).
  • Tal Harari, Facebook Frenzy Around the World: The Different Implications Facebook Has on Law Students, Lawyers, and Judges, 19 ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 1 (2012) (citing Carolyn Elefant, The “Power” of Social Media: Legal Issues & Best Practices for Utilities Engaging Social Media, 32 Energy L. J. 1 (2011)).
  • Assaf Harel, Preventing Terrorist Attacks on Offshore Platforms: Do States Have Sufficient Legal Tools?, 4 Harv. Nat'l Sec. J. 131 (2012) (citing John Wyeth Griggs, BP Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill, 32 Energy L.J. 57 (2011)).
  • Ryan Harrigan, Transcanada's Keystone Xl Pipeline: Politics, Environmental Harm, & Eminent Domain Abuse, 1 U. Balt. J. Land & Dev. 207 (2012) (citing Christopher J. Barr, Growing Pains: FERC's Responses to Challenges to the Development of Oil Pipeline Infrastructure, 28 Energy L.J. 43 (2007)).
  • Bryan Harrington, California Ex Rel. Lockyer v. FERC: In Which the 9th Circuit Tells the FERC "Yes, You Can", 27 Energy L.J. 205, 216 (2006) (citing John S. Moot, Economic Theories of Regulation and Electricity Restructuring, 25 Energy L.J. 273 (2004)).
  • Wesley N. Harris, China Energy: A Crossroads Historiography, 37 T. Marshall L. Rev. 255 (2012) (citing Yong Huang et al, China's 2007 Anti-Monopoly Law: Competition and the Chinese Petroleum Industry, 31 Energy L.J. 337 (2010)).
  • Jeffrey L. Harrison, Thomas D. Morgan & Paul R. Verkuil, Regulatory Education and Its Reform, 16 Yale J. on Reg. 145, (1999) (book review) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994)).
  • Jeffrey L. Harrison, Public Utilities and the First Amendment: The Economics and Ideology of Pacific Gas & Electric, 38 U. Fla. L. Rev. 319 (1986) (citing Hanschen, Harris & Woo, Consumer Access to Utility Mailings: First Amendment and Other Issues, 5 Energy L.J. 327 (1984)).
  • Rachel Feinberg Harrison, Carbon Allowances: A New Way of Seeing an Invisible Asset, 62 SMU L. Rev. 1915 (2009) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008); Panel Discussion, EBA Climate Change Primer: Cap and Trade, 29 Energy L.J. 173 (2008)).
  • Christianson Hartman, Is the Wind Mine to Give Away? Guidance for Testators Wishing to Transfer a Wind Interest, 1 Est. Plan. & Community Prop. L.J. 399 (2009) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1930 (1990), The Legal and Regulatory Implications of Airline Computer Reservation Systems (citing Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).
  • 100 Harv. L. Rev. 182 (1986), Negative Speech Rights for Corporations (citing Hanschen, Harris & Woo, Consumer Access to Utility Mailings: First Amendment and Other Issues, 5 Energy L.J. 327 (1984)).
  • 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1306 (1990), Preemption and Regulatory Efficiency in Federal Energy Statutes (citing Lindh, Federal Preemption of State Regulation in the Field of Electricity and Natural Gas: A Supreme Court Chronicle, 10 Energy L.J. 277 (1989); Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988); Goldsmith,  Utility Rates and "Takings,"' 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989)).
  • Alvaro Hasani, Forecasting the End of Climate Change Litigation: Why Expert Testimony Based on Climate Models Should Not Be Admissible, 32 Miss. C. L. Rev. 83 (2013) (citing Brooks E. Harlow & Roy W. Spencer, Ph.D., An Inconvenient Burden of Proof? Co2 Nuisance Plaintiffs Will Face Challenges in Meeting the Daubert Standard, 32 Energy L.J. 459 (2011)).
  • Jill Elaine Hasday, Interstate Compacts in a Democratic Society: The Problem of Permanency, 49 Fla. L. Rev. 1 (1997) (citing Frank P. Darr, Electric Holding Company Regulation by Multistate Compact, 14 Energy L.J. 357 (1993)).
  • Benjamin D. Hatch, Dividing the Pie in the Sky: The Need for a New Lunar Resources Regime, 24 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 229 (2010) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, The Bell Tolls for Hydrocarbons: What's Next?, 29 Energy L.J. 381 (2008)).
  • Janie Hauser, From Sleeping Giant to Friendly Giant: Rethinking the United States Solar Energy Trade War with China, 38 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 1061 (2013) (citing Allison S. Clements & Douglass D. Sims, A Clean Energy Deployment Administration: The Right Policy for Emerging Renewable Technologies, 31 Energy L.J. 397 (2010)).
  • Jerry A. Hausman et al., Are Regulators Forward-Looking? The Market Price of Copper Versus the Regulated Price of Mandatory Access to Unbundled Local Loops in Telecommunications Networks, 61 Fed. Comm. L.J. 199 (2008) (citing William J. Baumol & J. Gregory Sidak, The Pig in the Python: Is Lumpy Capacity Investment Used and Useful?, 23 Energy L.J. 383 (2002)).
  • Thomas L. Hazen & Jerry W. Markam, Broker-Dealer Op. Securities & Commodities Law § 14:9, Regulatory Challenges-Derivative Markets (2011) (citing Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 363 (2006)).
  • Douglas L. Heinold, Note and Comment, Retail Wheeling: Is Competition Among Energy Utilities an Environmental Disaster, or Can It Be Reconciled with Integrated Resource Planning?,22 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 301 (1996) (citing Isaac D. Benkin, Who Makes the Rules?  Federal and State Jurisdiction over Electric Transmission Access, 13 Energy L.J. 45  (1992)).
  • Bernard G. Helldorfer, Energy Law,44 Bus. Law. 236 (1988) (reviewing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).  
  • Tate L. Hemingson, Why Airlines Should Be Afraid: The Potential Impact of Cap and Trade and Other Carbon Emissions Reduction Proposals on the Airline Industry, 75 J. Air L. & Com. 741 (2010) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • Joan MacLeod Heminway, Rock, Paper, Scissors: Choosing the Right Vehicle for Federal Corporate Governance Initiatives, 10 Fordham J. of Corp. and Fin. L. 225 (2005) (citing James Barker, Jr. et al., Regulation of Power Pools and System Operators: an International Comparison, 18 Energy L.J. 261 (1997)).
  • Charles P. Henderson, Tenth Circuit Survey, Oil & Gas Law,74 Denv. U. L. Rev. 489 (1997) (citing Lindh, Federal Preemption of State Regulation in the Field of Electricity and Natural Gas: A Supreme Court Chronicle, 10 Energy L.J. 277 (1989); Cody L. Graves & Maria Mercedes Seidler, The Regulation of Gathering in a Federal System, 15 Energy L.J. 405 (1994)).  
  • Michael G. Henry, Getting More out of This "Relationship": Re-Examining FERC’s Generator Interconnection Authority to Help More Renewable Resources Interconnect Under FERC’s Interconnection Policy, 2 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L. 311 (2007) (citing Mary Ann Ralls, Congress Got It Right: There's No Need to Mandate Renewable Portfolio Standards, 27 Energy L.J. 451 (2006)).
  • Richard B. Herzog, Nicholas W. Fels, Offsets Under S111 of the Clean Air Act: The Inconvenient Need for Additionality and the Role of Super-Categories, 43 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10257 (2013) (citing Robert R. Nordhaus, Modernizing the Clean Air Act: Is There Life After 40?, 33 Energy L.J. 365 (2012)).
  • Peter Hettich, Governance by Mutual Benchmarking in Postal Markets: How State-Owned Enterprises May Induce Private Competitors to Observe Policy Goals, 32 U. Dayton L. Rev. 199 (2007) (citing Harvey L. Reiter, Competition Between Public and Private Distributors in a Restructured Power Industry, 19 Energy L. J. 333 (1998)).
  • Jonathan Hibshman, Utilizing Wind Power to Offset Agribusiness Utility Costs, 12 Drake J. Agric. L. 475, 492+ (2007) (citing Darrell Blakeway and Carol Brotman White, Tapping the Power of Wind: FERC Initiatives to Facilitate Transmission of Wind Power, 26 Energy L.J. 393 (2005)).
  • Jonathan Hibshman, Utilizing Wind Power to Offset Agribusiness Utility Costs, 12 Drake J. Agric. L. 475, 492+ (2007) (citing Michael D. Hornstein & J.S. Gebhart Stoermer, The Energy Policy Act of 2005: PURPA Reform, the Amendments and their Implications, 27 Energy L.J. 25 (2006)).
  • Jonathan Hibshman, Utilizing Wind Power to Offset Agribusiness Utility Costs, 12 Drake J. Agric. L. 475, 492 (2007) (citing Mary Ann Ralls, Congress Got it Right: There’s No Need to Mandate Renewable Portfolio, 27 Energy L.J. 451 (2006)).
  • Jonathan G. Hieneman, Note and Comment, The Shrinking Reach of the Commerce Power: Is Wetland Jurisdiction in Danger?,10 J. Nat. Resources & Envtl. L. 341 (1994-5) (citing Stephen J. Stokes, Note, The Limit of Government's Regulatory Authority over Non-Adjacent Wetlands: Hoffman Homes, Inc. v. EPA, 15 Energy L.J. 137 (1994)).
  • Megan Higgins, Is Marine Renewable Energy a Viable Industry in the United States? Lessons Learned from the 7th Marine Law Symposium, 14 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 562 (2009) (citing Hon. Jon Wellinghoff, James Pederson & David L. Morenoff, Facilitating Hydrokinetic Energy Development Through Regulatory Innovation, 29 Energy L. J. 397 (2008)).
  • Michael Hill, NEPA at the Limits of Risk Assessment: Whether to Discuss a Potential Terrorist Attack on a Nuclear Power Plant Under the National Environmental Policy Act, 78 Fordham L. Rev. 3007 (2010) (citing Roland M. Frye, Jr., The Current “Nuclear Renaissance” in the United States, Its Underlying Reasons, and Its Potential Pitfalls, 29 Energy L.J. 279 (2008)).
  • Jordan Jay Hillman & Ronald Braeutigam, Price Level Regulation Based on Inflation Is Not an Attractive Alternative to Profit Level Regulation: A Review of Price Level Regulation for Diversified Public Utilities,84 Nw. U. L. Rev. 665 (1990) (book review) (citing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988); Griggs, Competitive Bidding and Independent Power Producers: Is Deregulation Coming to the Electric Utility Industry? 9 Energy L.J. 415 (1988); Hoecker, "Used and Useful": Autopsy of a Ratemaking Policy, 8 Energy L.J. 303 (1987)).
  • Rachel A. Hird, Thomas W. Wälde and Fair and Equitable Treatment, 27 No. 3 J. Energy & Nat. Res. L. 377 (2009) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Wade A. Hoefling, Gas Balancing Problems in a Deregulated Market: Changes and Possible Solutions Under Oklahoma Law,25 Tulsa L.J. 63 (1989) (citing Griggs, Restructuring the Natural Gas Industry: Order No. 436 and Other Regulatory Initiatives, 7 Energy L.J. 71 (1986)).
  • Dolly Hoffman & Jeffrey R. Seaman, Note, A Pragmatic Solution to a  Complex Dilemma: A Fundamental Approach to Resolving the Conflict Between CERCLA and the Bankruptcy Code, 4 Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev. 243 (1996) (citing Kelly S. Hunter, Note, Defining the Scope of Lender Liability After Kelly v. EPA: Who Will Have Safe Harbor?, 16 Energy L.J. 159 (1995)).  
  • Nathan R. Hoffman, The Feasibility of Applying Strict-Liability Principles to Carbon Capture and Storage, 49 Washburn L.J. 527 (2010) (citing Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007)).
  • Brandon Hofmeister, Bridging the Gap: Using Social Psychology to Design Market Interventions to Overcome the Energy Efficiency Gap in Residential Energy Markets, 19 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 1 (2010) (citing Jeff. D. Makholm, Decoupling for Energy Distributors: Changing 19th Century Tariff Structures to Address 21st Century Energy Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 157 (2008)).
  • Major Frank D. Hollifield, Yet Another Industry on the Taxpayer-Subsidized Dole: Why Section 8093 of the Continuing Authorization Act of 1988 (40 U.S.C. S 591) Should Be Repealed, 65 A.F. L. Rev. 187 (2010) (citing Ajay Gupta, Tracking Stranded Costs, 21 Energy L. J. 113 (2000); Gregory N. Basheda, et al., The FERC, Stranded Cost Recovery, and Municipalization, 19 Energy L.J. 351 (1998)).
  • Kendall Hollrah, Learning to Live Together: Exploring Interactions Between Bankruptcy Law and Energy Law, 42 Hous. L. Rev. 529, 564 (2005) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets to Set Electric Rates? 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003)).
  • Lynne Holt et al., (When) to Build or Not to Build?: The Role of Uncertainty in Nuclear Power Expansion, 3 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L. 174 (2008) (citing William J. Baumol & J. Gregory Sidak, The Pig in the Python: Is Lumpy Capacity Investment Used and Useful?, 23 Energy L.J. 383 (2002)).
  • Jennifer Skougard Horne, Note, Getting from Here to There: Devising an Optimal Regulatory Model for CO2 Transport in a New Carbon Capture and Sequestration Industry, 30 J. Land Res. & Envtl. L. 357 (2010) (citing Robert R. Nordhaus & Emily Pitlick, Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Regulation, 30 Energy L.J. 85 (2009); Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008); Christopher J. Barr, Growing Pains: FERC's Response to Challenges to the Development of Oil Pipeline Infrastructure, 28 Energy L.J. 43, 44 (2007); Leonard L. Coburn, The Case for Petroleum Pipeline Deregulation, 3 Energy L.J. 225 (1982)).
  • Donald T. Hornstein, Resiliency, Adaptation, and the Upsides of Ex Post Lawmaking, 89 N.C. L. Rev. 1549 (2011) (citing Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Michael D. Hornstein & J.S. Gebhard Soermer, The Energy Policy Act of 2005: PURPA Reform, the Amendments, and Their Implications, 27 Energy L.J. 25 (2006) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995)).
  •  
  • Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 363, 422 (2006) (citing Hon. Josephy T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, And the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1 (2005)).
  • Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 363, 422+ (2006) (citing James G. Bohn, Securities Litigation in the Utility Sector, 26 Energy L.J. 473 (2005)).
  • Joshua J. Houser, Supplying the Light at the End of the Tunnel: Using State-Level Experience to Develop Federal-Level Renewable Energy Policy, 19 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 153 (2010) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79, 103 (2008)).
  • Laura Householder, Have We All Gone Batty? The Need for A Better Balance Between the Conservation of Protected Species and the Development of Clean Renewable Energy, 36 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 807 (2012) (citing John Arnold McKinsey, Regulating Avian Impacts Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Other Laws: The Wind Industry Collides with One of Its Own, The Environmental Protection Movement, 28 Energy L.J. 71 (2007)).
  • Herbert Hovenkamp, The Takings Clause And Improvident Regulatory Bargains, 108 Yale L.J. 801 (1999) (book review) (citing Daniel F. Spulber, Pricing and the Incentive to Invest in Pipelines After Great Lakes, 15 Energy L.J. 377 (1994)).
  • Bruce R. Huber, How Did Rggi Do It? Political Economy and Emissions Auctions, 40 Ecology L.Q. 59 (2013) (citing John T. Miller Jr., Conscripting State Regulatory Authorities in a Federal Electric Rate Regulatory Regime: A Goal of PURPA Partially Realized, 4 Energy L.J. 77 (1983)).
  • Andrew G. Humphrey, Comment, Antitrust Jurisdiction and Remedies in an Electric Utility Price Squeeze, 52 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1090 (1985) (citing Pace & Landon, Introducing Competition Into the Electric Utility Industry: An Economic Appraisal, 3 Energy L.J. 1 (1982)).  
  • David J. Hurlbut, Multistate Decision Making for Renewable Energy and Transmission: An Overview, 81 U. Colo. L. Rev. 677 (2010) (citing Clinton A. Vince & John S. Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation in a Post Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989)).
  • Matthew Hutton & Thomas Hutton, Legal and Regulatory Impediments to Vehicle-to-Grid Aggregation, 36 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 337 (2012) (citing Debbie Swanstrom & Meredith M. Jolivert, DOE Transmission Corridor Designations & FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities, 30 Energy L. J. 415 (2009); Ronald E. Minsk et al., Plugging Cars into the Grid: Why the Government Should Make a Choice, 30 Energy L.J. 317 (2009)).
  • Mark A. Imbrogno, Pipedream to Pipeline: Ownership of Kentucky's Subterranean Pore Space for Use in Carbon Capture and Sequestration, 49 U. Louisville L. Rev. 291 (2010) (citing Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008)).
  • Allan Ingelson et al., Long-Term Liability for Carbon Capture and Storage in Depleted North American Oil and Gas Reservoirs - A Comparative Analysis, 31 Energy L.J. 431 (2010) (citing Philip Marston & Patricia Moore, From EOR To CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008)).
  • 25 J. Nat'l A. Admin. L. Judges 269, 322+ (2005), Administrative Sovereignty: Expanding the Scope of Federal Agency Enforcement Powers in Alaska v. Environmental Protection Agency, (citing Bonnie Bridges, Note, Using Alaska v. EPA to Unmask Clean Air Act, 25 Energy L.J. 431 (2004)).
  • Rachael M. Jackson, Responding to Threats of Bankruptcy Abuse in a Post-Enron World: Trusting the Bankruptcy Judge as the Guardian of Debtor Estates, 2005 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 451 (2005) (citing Ralph R. Mabey & Patrick S. Malone, Chapter 11 Reorganization of Utility Companies, 22 Energy L.J. 277 (2001)).
  • Patrick R. Jacobi, Renewable Portfolio Standard Generator Applicability Requirements: How States Can Stop Worrying and Learn to Love the Dormant Commerce Clause, 30 Vt. L. Rev. 1079 (2006) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the “Perfect Storm,” 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001)).
  • Patrick R. Jacobi, Renewable Portfolio Standard Generator Applicability Requirements: How States Can Stop Worrying and Learn to Love the Dormant Commerce Clause, 30 Vt. L. Rev. 1079, 1134 (2006) (citing Peter Navarro & Michael Shames, Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned From California, 24 Energy L.J. 23 (2003)).
  • Gregory C. Jantz, Incentives for Electric Generation Infrastructure Development, 2 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L. 373 (2007) (citing Darrell Blakeway & Carol Brotman White, Tapping the Power of Wind: FERC Initiatives to Facilitate Transmission of Wind Power, 26 Energy L.J. 393 (2005)).
  • Michael T. Jewell, Comment, The Evolving Pipeline Regulations: Historical Perspectives and a New Model for Pipeline Safety in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, 34 Transp. L.J. 167 (2007) (citing Steven Reed & Pantelis Michalopolous, Oil Pipeline Reform: Still in the Labyrinth?, 16 Energy L.J. 65 (1995)).
  • Kevin R. Johnson, Symposium, An Essay on Immigration, Citizenship, and U.S./Mexico Relations: The Tale of Two Treaties, 5 Sw. J.L. & Trade Am. 121 (1998) (citing Arturo Gándara, United States-Mexico Electricity Transfers: Of Alien Electrons and the Migration of Undocumented Environmental Burdens, 16 Energy L.J. 1 (1995)).
  • Warren H. Johnson, Note, Limited Liability Companies (Llc): Is the Llc Liability Shield Holding Up Under Judicial Scrutiny?,35 New Eng. L. Rev. 177 (2000) (citing Martin G. Malsch, The  Purchase of U.S. Nuclear Power Plants by Foreign Entities, 20 Energy L.J. 263 (1999)).
  • Richard P. Johnson, Power to the People:  The First Amendment and Utility Operating Expenses,69 Wash. U. L.B. 945  (1991) (citing Norton & Early, Limitations on the Obligation to Provide Access to Electric Transmission and Distribution Lines, 5 Energy L.J. 47 (1984)).
  • Evan D. Johnson, Anchorage, We Have a Problem: The Cold, Harsh Truth About the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission's Ability to Regulate Gas-Cap Production (A Texas Perspective ), 44 Hous. L. Rev. 1455, 1490+ (2008) (citing Jeffrey M. Petrash, Long-Term Natural Gas Contracts: Dead, Dying, or Merely Resting?, 27 Energy L.J. 545 (2006)).
  • Margaret A. Johnston, Environmental Law--Clean Water Act--The Supreme Court Scales Back the Army Corps of Engineers' Jurisdiction over "Navigable Waters" Under the Clean Water Act. Solid Waste Agency v. United States Army Corps of Engineers,24 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 329 (2002) (citing Stephen Jay Stokes, Note, The Limit of Government's Regulatory Authority over Non-Adjacent Wetlands: Hoffman Homes, Inc. v. EPA, 15 Energy L.J. 137 (1994)).
  • Thomas Joo, Global Warming and the Management-Centered Corporation, 44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 671 (2009) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • Margaret E. Juliano, Stalemate: The Need for Limitations on Regulatory Deference in Electric Bankruptcies, 20 Bankr. Dev. J. 245 (2003) (citing Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Retail Electric Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 Energy L.J. 27 (2000)).
  • Sam Kalen, Where Do We Go from Here?: The Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act -- Past, Present, and Future, 98 W. Va. L. Rev. 1023 (1996) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).  
  • Sam Kalen, The Devolution of NEPA: How the APA Transformed the Nation’s Environmental Policy, 33 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 483 (2009) (citing James J. Hoecker, The NEPA Mandate and Federal Regulation of the Natural Gas Industry, 13 Energy L.J. 265 (1992)).
  • Michael Kantro, Symposium, Shall It Be Said That My Dusk Was in Truth My Dawn? What States Can Gleam from the Environmental Consequences of Deregulating Electricity in California,25 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 533 (2000) (citing Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995)).
  • Hilary Kao, Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program, 37 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 425 (2013) (citing Allison S. Clements & Douglass D. Sims, A Clean Energy Deployment Administration: The Right Policy for Emerging Renewable Technologies, 31 Energy L. J. 397 (2010)).
  • Roberta S. Karmel, Is the Public Utility Holding Company Act a Model for Breaking Up the Banks That Are Too-Big-to-Fail?, 62 Hastings L.J. 821 (2011) (citing Markian M.W. Melnyk & William S. Lamb, The PUHCA's Gone, What Is Next for Holding Companies?, 27 Energy L.J. 1 (2006); Hon. Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Chris J. Katopis, Perfect Happiness?: Game Theory as a Tool for Enhancing Patent Quality, 10 Yale J. L. & Tech. 360 (2008) (citing Michael J. Doane & Daniel F. Spulber, Municipalization: Opportunism and Bypass in Electric Power, 18 Energy L.J. 333 (1997)).
  • Joseph D. Kearney, Will the FCC Go the Way of the ICC?,71 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1153 (2000) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).
  • Joseph D. Kearney & Thomas W. Merrill, The Great Transformation of Regulated Industries Law,98 Colum. L. Rev. 1323 (1998) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994); Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electric Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995); Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994)).  
  • Richard P. Keck, Reevaluating the Rural Electrification Administration: A New Deal for the Taxpayer, 16 Envtl. L. 39 (1985) (citing Pace & Landon, Introducing Competition into the Electric Utility Industry: An Economic Appraisal, 3 Energy L.J. 1 (1982)).
  • Michael Keegan, Bargaining for Power: Resolving Open Questions from Nrg Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission, 65 Me. L. Rev. 99 (2012) (citing Carmen L. Gentile, The Mobile-Sierra Rule: Its Illustrious Past and Uncertain Future, 21 Energy L. J. 353, 358 (2000); David G. Tewskbury, Stephanie S. Lim & Grace Su, New Chapters in the Mobile-Sierra Story: Application of the Doctrine After NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission, 32 Energy L. J. 433 (2011); David G. Tewksbury & Stephanie S. Lim, Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts, 26 Energy L. J. 437 (2005); Mary Ann Walker, Settlement Practice at the FERC: Boom or Bane, 7 Energy L. J. 343 (1986)).
  • Michelle Kelban, Energy Law, 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 927 (1999) (citing Daniel F. Spulber, Pricing and the Incentive to Invest in Pipelines After Great Lakes, 15 Energy L.J. 377 (1994)).
  • Matthew Kellar, Note, “Damn the Torpedoes! Full Speed Ahead”: The FCC’s Decision to Deregulate Media Ownership and the Threat to Viewpoint Diversity, 12 J.L. & Pol’y 891 (2004) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC’s Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).
  • Sally J. Kelley, Rana Balakrishnan, Stephanie Brodacz & Meg Mahoney, Agricultural Law: A Selected Bibliography, October 1992-December 1995,61 Mo. L. Rev. 877 (1996) (citing Stephen Jay, Note, The Limit of Government's Regulatory Authority over Non-Adjacent Wetlands, 15 Energy L.J. 137 (1994)).
  • Joseph T. Kelliher, Comment, Pushing the Envelope: Development of Federal Electric Transmission Access Policy, 42 Am. U. L. Rev. 543 (1993) (citing Jerome Nelson, The Chevron Deference Rule and Judicial Review of FERC Orders, 9 Energy L.J. 59 (1991)).
  • Hon. Joseph T. Kelliher, The Changing Landscape of Federal Energy Law, 61 Admin. L. Rev. 611 (2009) (citing Joseph T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, and the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1 (2005)).
  • Claire R. Kelly, Financial Crises and Civil Society, 11 Chi. J. Int'l L. 505 (2011) (citing Ambassador Stuart Eizenstat, The U.S. Role in Solving Climate Change: Green Growth Policies Can Enable Leadership Despite Economic Downturn,30 Energy L.J. 1 (2009)).
  • Katherine D. Kelly, Don't Hide Behind Statutory Roadblocks: How the United States Can Resolve Conflicts to Implementing the German Feed-in Tariff Model and Contribute to International Efforts to Control Climate Change, 50 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 726 (2012) (citing Darrel Blakeway, Book Review, 29 Energy L.J. 217 (2008)).
  • Susan Kelly & Elise Caplan, Time for a Day 1.5 Market: A Proposal to Reform RTO-Run Centralized Wholesale Electricity Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 491 (2008) (citing Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007); Michael Dworkin & Rachel Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organization, 28 Energy L.J. 543 (2007); Jay Morrison, EPAct '05 Implementation: Is FERC in Full Compliance, 28 Energy L.J. 631 (2007)).
  • Suedeen G. Kelly, Intrastate Natural Gas Regulation: Finding Order in the Chaos, 9 Yale J. on Reg. 355 (1992) (citing Robert C. Means & Robert S. Angyal, The Regulation and Future Role of Direct Producer Sales, 5 Energy L.J. 1 (1984); Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988); William B. Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).
  • Suedeen G. Kelly, Maria F. Vouras & Jennifer S. Amerkhail, The Subdelegation Doctrine and the Application of Reference Prices in Mitigating Market Power, 26 Energy L.J. 297, 325 (2005) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets to Set Electric Rates?, 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003)).
  • Suedeen G. Kelly, Maria F. Vouras & Jennifer S. Amerkhail, The Subdelegation Doctrine and the Application of Reference Prices in Mitigating Market Power, 26 Energy L.J. 297, 325 (2005) (citing Hon. Josephy T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, and the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1(2005)).
  • Paul A. Kemnitzer, Note, The Anti-Competitive Effects of Stranded Costs on the Creation of Municipal Electric Companies,45 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 701 (2002) (citing Harvey L. Reiter, Competition Between Public and Private Distributors in a Restructured Power Industry, 19 Energy L.J. 333 (1998)).
  • Orin S. Kerr, Shedding Light on Chevron: An Empirical Study of the Chevron Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 15 Yale J. on Reg. 1 (1998) (citing Jerome Nelson, The Chevron Deference Rule and Judicial Review of FERC Orders, 9 Energy L.J. 59 (1988)).
  • Peter J. Kiernan, An Analysis of Hydrofracturing Gubernatorial Decision Making, 5 Alb. Gov't L. Rev. 769 (2012) (citing Lynn Kerr McKay, Ralph H. Johnson & Laurie Alberts Salita, Science and the Reasonable Development of Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Resources in Pennsylvania and New York, 32 Energy L.J. 125 (2011)).
  • Todd Kimbrough, Did I Dance on the Tables? Did I Shoot out the Lights? European Electricity Policy as a Guide to America's Energy Future, 4 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 675 (2005) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the “Perfect Storm,” 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001)).
  • Todd F. Kimbrough, Did I Dance on the Tables? Did I Shoot Out the Lights? European Electricity Policy as a Guide to America’s Energy Future, Wash. U. Stud. L. Rev. 675 (2005) (citing Peter Navarro & Michael Shames, Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned From California, 24 Energy L.J. 23 (2003)).
  • Todd F. Kimbrough, Did I Dance on the Tables? Did I Shoot Out the Lights? European Electricity Policy as a Guide to America’s Energy Future, Wash. U. Stud. L. Rev. 675 (2005) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets to Set Electric Rates?, 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003)).
  • Todd Kimbrough, Did I Dance on the Tables? Did I Shoot Out the Lights? European Electricity Policy as a Guide to America’s Energy Future, 4 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 675 (2005) (citing William H. Hieronymus, J. Stephen Henderson & Carolyn A. Berry, Market Power Analysis of the Electricity Generation Sector, 23 Energy L.J. 1 (2002)).
  • Randy King, Note, Royalty Owner Claims to Take-or-Pay Payments Under the Implied Covenant to Market and the Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, 33 S. Tex. L. Rev. 801 (1992) (citing J. Manning, Gas Inventory Charges: Evolving Mechanisms for Allocating the Risks and Recovering the Costs of Maintaining Gas Supply, 11 Energy L.J. 1 (1990) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry  from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988); Gas Inventory Charges: Evolving Mechanisms for Allocating the Risks and Recovering of the Costs of Maintaining Gas Supply, 11 Energy L.J. 1 (1990)).
  • Martin V. Kirkwood, Comment, Distributor Bypass in the Deregulated Natural Gas Industry--Are Consumers Being Left in the Cold?, 39 Cath. U. L. Rev. 1157 (1990) (citing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1, 8-10 (1988); Lindh, Federal Preemption of State Regulation in the Field of Electricity and Natural Gas: A Supreme Court Chronicle, 10 Energy L.J. 277 (1989); Mogel & Gregg, Appropriateness of Imposing Common Carrier Status on Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, 4 Energy L.J. 155 (1983)).
  • Alexandra B. Klass, The Frontier of Eminent Domain, 79 U. Colo. L. Rev. 651 (2008) (citing Jim Behnke & Harold Dondis, The Sage Approach to Immediate Entry by Private Entities Exercising Federal Eminent Domain Authority Under the Natural Gas Act and the Federal Power Act, 27 Energy L.J. 499 (2006)).
  • Alexandra B. Klass & Elizabeth J. Wilson, Interstate Transmission Challenges for Renewable Energy: A Federalism Mismatch, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1801 (2012) (citing Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007); Debbie Swanson & Meredith M. Jolivert, DOE Transmission Corridor Designations & FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities?, 30 Energy L.J. 415 (2009); Robert R. Nordhaus & Emily Pitlick, Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Regulation, 30 Energy L.J. 85 (2009); Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Completive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994); Jacob Dweck, David Wochner & Michael Brooks, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006)).
  • Alexandra B. Klass, Takings and Transmission, 91 N.C. L. Rev. 1079 (2013) (citing Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147, 155 (2007)).
  • Alexandra B. Klass & Elizabeth J. Wilson, Climate Change, Carbon Sequestration, and Property Rights, 2010 U. Ill. L. Rev. 363 (2010) (citing Jim Behnke & Harold Dondis, The Sage Approach to Immediate Entry by Private Entities Exercising Federal Eminent Domain Authority Under the Natural Gas Act and the Federal Power Act, 27 Energy L.J. 499 (2006)).
  • Gregory Klass, The Very Idea of a First Amendment Right Against Compelled Subsidization, 38 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1087 (2005) (citing R. Paul Gee, Note, Who Pays for Charitable Contributions Made by Utility Companies?, 12 Energy L.J. 363 (1991)).
  • Christine A. Klein, On Dams and Democracy, 78 Or. L. Rev. 641 (1999) (citing Richard L. Gordon, Prisoners of Myth: The Leadership of the Tennessee Valley Authority, 1933-1990, 16 Energy L.J. 138 (1995); John D. Echeverria, The Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986, 8 Energy L.J. 61 (1987)).
  • Mark Klock, Lessons Learned from Bernard Madoff: Why We Should Partially Privatize the Barney Fifes at the SEC, 42 Ariz. St. L.J. 783 (2010) (citing Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Jeremy Knee, Rational Electricity Regulation: Environmental Impacts and the "Public Interest", 113 W. Va. L. Rev. 739 (2011) (citing Janice A. Beecher, The Prudent Regulator: Politics, Independence, Ethics, and the Public Interest, 29 Energy L.J. 577 (2008)).
  • Prof. Dr. Günter Knieps, Symposium, Interconnection and Network Access, 23 Fordham Int'l L.J. 90 (2000) (citing William B. Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).
  • Charles H. Koch, Control and Governance of Transmission Organizations in the Restructured Electricity Industry, 27 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 569  (2000) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Antitrust Policy in the New Electricity Industry, 17 Energy L.J. 29 (1996); James Barker et al., Regulation of Power Pools and System Operators: An International Comparison, 18 Energy L.J. 261 (1997); Robert J. Michaels, The Governance of Transmission Operators, 20 Energy L.J. 233 (1999)).
  • Charles H. Koch, Jr., Collaborative Governance in the Restructured Electricity Industry, 40 Wake Forest L. Rev. 589 (2005) (citing Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Retail Electric Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 Energy L.J. 27 (2000)).
  • Charles H. Koch, Jr., Collaborative Governance: Lessons for Europe from U.S. Electricity Restructuring, 61 Admin. L. Rev. 71 (2009) (citing Thomas von Danwitz, Regulation and Liberalization of the European Market--A German View, 27 Energy L.J. 423 (2006)).
  • Laura Koch, The Promise of Wave Energy, 2 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 162 (2008) (citing Carolyn Elefant, Ocean Energy Development in the 1990s, 14 Energy L.J. 335 (1993);  Barbara E. Schneider, FERC’s First-in-Time Rule: An Impediment to Hydropower Development, 5 Energy L.J. 97 (1984)).
  • Thomas H. Koenig & Michael L. Rustad, Reconceptualizing the Bp Oil Spill As Parens Patriae Products Liability, 49 Hous. L. Rev. 291 (2012) (citing John Wyeth Griggs, BP Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill, 32 Energy L.J. 57 (2011)).
  • Michael Kohler, The Ambit of FERC Jurisdiction over Electricity Contracts During Insolvency: Bankruptcy Jurisdiction and the "Just and Reasonable" Directive, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 1947, 1995 (2004) (citing Michael J. Gergen, George D. Cannon, Jr. & David G. Tewksbury, Market-Based Ratemaking and the Western Energy Crisis of 2000 and 2001, 24 Energy L.J. 321 (2003)).
  • Michael Kohler, The Ambit of FERC Jurisdiction over Electricity Contracts During Insolvency: Bankruptcy Jurisdiction and the "Just And Reasonable" Directive, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 1947, 1995 (2004) (citing Walter R. Hall II, Securitization and Stranded Cost Recovery, 25 Energy L.J. 173 (2004)).
  • A. Lawrence Kolbe & William B. Tye, The Duquesne Opinion: How Much "Hope" Is There for Investors in Regulated Firms?, 8 Yale J. on Reg. 113 (1991) (citing Hoecker, "Used and Useful": Autopsy of a Ratemaking Policy, 8 Energy L.J. 303 (1987)).  
  • Brad A. Kopetsky, Deutschland Über Alles: Why German Regulations Need to Conquer the Divided U.S. Renewable-Energy Framework to Save Clean Tech (and the World), 2008 Wis. L. Rev. 941 (2008) (citing Mary Ann Ralls, Congress Got It Right: There's No Need to Mandate Renewable Portfolio Standards, 27 Energy L.J. 451 (2006); Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Itzchak Kornfeld, A Global Water Apartheid: From Revelation to Resolution, 43 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 701 (2010) (citing Joel A. Youngblood, Note, Alive and Well: The Rural Electrification Act Preempts State Condemnation Law: City of Morgan City v. South Louisiana Electric Coop. Ass’n, 16 Energy L.J. 489 (1995)).
  • William E. Kovacic, Antitrust Analysis of Joint Ventures and Teaming Arrangements Involving Government Contractors, 58 Antitrust L.J. 1059 (1989) (citing Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).
  • Kathryn E. Kransdorf, Not on My Coastline: The Jurisdictional Battle Over the Siting of LNG Import Terminals, 17 Fordham Envtl L. Rev. 37, 87+ (2005) (citing Monica Berry, Liquefied Natural Gas Import Terminals: Jurisdiction of Siting, Constructing, and Operation in the Context of Commerce Clause Jurisprudence, 26 Energy L.J. 135 (2005)).
  • Kathryn E. Kransdorf, Not on My Coastline: The Jurisdictional Battle over the Siting of LNG Import Terminals, 17 Fordham Envtl L. Rev. 37, 87+ (2005) (citing Gearold L. Knowles, Liquefied Natural Gas: Regulation in a Competitive Natural Gas Market, 24 Energy L.J. 293 (2003)).
  • Kimberly D. Krawiec, The Return of the Rogue, 51 Ariz. L. Rev. 127 (2009) (citing John S. Moot, Compliance Programs, Penalty Mitigation and the FERC, 29 Energy L.J. 547 (2008)).
  • Neelie Kroes, Improving Competition in European Energy Markets Through Effective Unbundling, 31 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1387 (2008) (citing Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007); Monika Ehrman, Competition Is a Sin: An Evaluation of the Formation and Effects of a Natural Gas OPEC, 27 Energy L.J. 175 (2006)).
  • Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr., Reconsidering the Nondelegation Doctrine: Universal Service, the Power to Tax, and the Ratification Doctrine, 80 Ind. L.J. 239 (2005) (citing Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Retail Electric Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 Energy L.J. 27 (2000)).
  • William S. Lamb, PUHCA’s Gone: What Is Next for Holding Companies?, 27 Energy L.J. 1 (2006) (citing Leonard S. Hyman, Investing in the "Plain Vanilla" Utility, 24 Energy L.J. 1 (2003)).
  • Bryan Lamble, Of Nesting Dolls and Trojan Horses: A Survey of Legal and Policy Issues Attendant to Vehicle-to-Grid Battery Electric Vehicles, 86 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 193 (2011) (citing Ronald E. Minsk et al., Plugging Cars into the Grid: Why the Government Should Make a Choice, 30 Energy L.J. 317 (2009); Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007)).
  • Laurie L. Largent, Symposium, Prospective Remedies Under Section 5 of the Natural Gas Act: Office of Consumers' Counsel v. FERC, 23 Tulsa L.J. 613 (1988) (citing Note, A Test for Abuse Under NPGA Section 601(c)(2): Office of Consumers' Counsel v. FERC, 8 Energy L.J. 93 (1987)).
  • Alexander C. Larson, William E. Kovacic & Douglas R. Mudd, Competitive Access Issues and Telecommunications Regulatory Policy,20 J. Contemp. L. 419 (1994) (citing William B. Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987); Norton IV & Michael E. Early, Limitations on the Obligation to Provide Access to Electric Transmission and Distribution Lines, 5 Energy L.J. 47 (1984)).
  • Alexander C. Larson, Wholesale Pricing and the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Guidelines for Compliance with the Avoided Cost Rule, 8 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 243 (1997) (citing William B. Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).
  • Alexander C. Larson & Terrence J. Schroepfer, New Telecommunications Technologies and Regulation: The Case of Personal Communications Services, 6 High Tech. L.J. 271 (1991) (citing William B. Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).  
  • Eric M. Larsson, 50 Causes of Action 2d 1, Cause of Action to Challenge Development of Wind Energy Turbine or Wind Energy Farm (2011) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • Andrew Laquet, The Role of Government in Energy Markets: A Look at the Market-Based Rates Process, the Ferc, and the Future of Energy Markets in America, 37 S. Ill. U. L.J. 395 (2013) (citing Hon. Joseph T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, and the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1 (2005); William L. Massey et al., Reliability-Based Competition in Wholesale Electricity: Legal and Policy Perspectives, 25 Energy L.J. 319 (2004); Patrick J. McCormick III & Sean B. Cunningham, The Requirements of the “Just and Reasonable” Standard: Legal Bases for Reform of Electric Transmission Rates, 21 Energy L.J. 389 (2000))
  • Mark A. Latham, The BP Deepwater Horizon: A Cautionary Tale for CCS, Hydrofracking, Geoengineering and Other Emerging Technologies with Environmental and Human Health Risks, 36 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 31 (2011) (citing Allan Ingelson et al., Long-Term Liability for Carbon Capture and Storage in Depleted North American Oil and Gas Reservoirs-A Comparative Analysis,31 Energy L.J. 431 (2010); Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008)).
  • Steven Lavender, Extending the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine to Regional Transmission Organization Petitioners on A Case-by-Case Basis, 20 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 879 (2013) (citing Ray S. Bolze et al., Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 ENERGY L.J. 79 (2000); Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel Aslin Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543 (2007); Susan Kelly & Elise Caplan, Time for a Day 1.5 Market: A Proposal to Reform RTO-Run Centralized Wholesale Electricity Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 491 (2008)).
  • Raymond W. Lawton, Symposium, Models of Cooperative Federalism for Telecommunications, 6 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 71 (1996) (citing Linda S. Portasik, The Transition to Fully Competitive Bulk Power Markets: Federal Regulatory Developments in the Electric Power Industry, 15 Energy L.J. 365 (1994)).
  • James B. Lebeck, Liquefied Natural Gas Terminals, Community Decisionmaking, and the 2005 Energy Policy Act , 85 Tex. L. Rev. 243, 269+ (2006) (citing Gearold L. Knowles, Liquefied Natural Gas: Regulation in a Competitive Natural Gas Market, 24 Energy L.J. 293 (2003)).
  • Alan S. Lederman, How Powerful Is the Nuclear Reactor Income Tax Credit?, 114 J. Tax'n 100 (2011) (citing Ben-Moshe, Crowell, Gale, Peace, Rosenblatt & Thomason, Financing the Nuclear Renaissance: The Benefits and Potential Pitfalls of Federal & State Government Subsidies and the Future of Nuclear Power in California, 30 Energy L.J. 497 (2009)).
  • Richard A. Leibert, The War on Energy: Why the United States and the International Community Need Cohesive Energy Infrastructure Security Policy, 29 Hous. J. Int'l L. 453, 487+ (2007) (citing Gearold L. Knowles, Liquefied Natural Gas: Regulation in a Competitive Natural Gas Market, 24 Energy L.J. 293 (2003)).
  • Alexandra Leidesdorf, Note, BP West Coast Products, LLC v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: Using the Changed Circumstances Threshold for Oil Pipeline Rates to Re-Enforce the Terms of EPACT and to Further Its Policy Objectives, 16 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 237, 260 (2005) (citing Report of the Oil Pipeline Regulation Committee, 24 Energy L.J. 261 (2003)).
  • Michael R. Lettrich, Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission: The Supreme Court Holds That the Costs of Decommissioning Tmi-2 May Be Classified as "Operating Expenses" Properly Chargeable Consumers, 5 Widener J. Pub. L. 865 (1996) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and "Takings," 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989); Michael E. Small, A FERC Electric Rate Primer, 5 Energy L.J. 107 (1984); James J. Hoecker, "Used and Useful": Autopsy of a Ratemaking Policy, 8 Energy L.J. 303 (1987)).
  • Sandra Levine & Katie Kendall, Energy Efficiency and Conservation: Opportunities, Obstacles, and Experiences, 8 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 101, 101+ (2007) (citing Mark Newton Lowry & Lawrence Kaufmann, Performance-Based Regulation of Utilities, 23 Energy L.J. 399 (2002)).
  • Matthew Libby, Deregulating the Electricity Market: What Can Be Learned from California's Mistakes, 22 Me. B.J. 236, 248+ (2007) (citing John S. Moot, Economic Theories of Regulation and Electricity Restructuring, 25 Energy L.J. 273 (2004)).
  • Diana M. Liebmann et al., Recent Developments in Texas and United States Energy Law, 4 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L 363 (2009) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The Bell Tolls for Hydrocarbons: What's Next?, 29 Energy L.J. 381 (2008)).
  • Meredith Blaydes Lilley & Jeremy Firestone, Wind Power, Wildlife, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act: A Way Forward, 38 Envtl. L. 1167 (2008) (citing John Arnold McKinsey, Regulating Avian Impacts Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Other Laws: The Wind Industry Collides with One of Its Own, the Environmental Protection Movement, 28 Energy L.J. 71 (2007)).
  • Frank R. Lindh, Keeping California's Pilot Lights Burning: A Rare Exercise of Presidential Powers, 16-SUM Nat. Resources & Env't 320 (2001) (citing Fels and Lindh, Lessons from the California "Apocalypse": Jurisdiction over Electric Utilities, 22 Energy L.J. 1 (2001)).   
  • List of Publicates of Thomas W. Wälde Since 1991, 27 No. 3 J. Energy & Nat. Res. L. 511 (2009) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • J. Mark Little, Note, The Choice of Rules Clause: A Solution to the Choice of Law Problem in Ethics Proceedings, 88 Tex. L. Rev. 855 (2010) (citing Jonathan H. Stevenson, The “No-Profits-to-Affiliates” Rule: A Misnomer, 10 Energy L.J. 315 (1989)).
  • Reinier Lock, Symposium, Mexico-United States Energy Relations and NAFTA,1 U.S.-Mex. L.J. 235 (1993) (citing The Canada/United States Free Trade Agreement and Trade in Energy, 9 Energy L.J. 327 (1988)).
  • Reed Elizabeth Loder, Breath of Life: Ethical Wind Power and Wildlife, 10 Vt. J. Envtl L. 507 (2009) (citing John Arnold McKinsey, Regulating Avian Impacts Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Other Laws: The Wind Industry Collides with One of Its Own, the Environmental Protection Movement, 28 Energy L.J. 71 (2007)).
  • Tracy J. Logan, Carbon Down Under-Lessons from Australia: Two Recommendations for Clarifying Subsurface Property Rights to Facilitate Onshore Geologic Carbon Sequestration in the United States, 11 San Diego Int'l L.J. 561 (2010) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008); Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007)).
  • James Gardner Long III, Independent Unaccountability: The Iaea's "Step Backward" in Regulating International Nuclear Reactor Safety in the Wake of the Fukushima Daiichi Disaster, 36 Suffolk Transnat'l L. Rev. 155 (2013) (citing Ronald M. Frye, Jr., The Current “Nuclear Renaissance” in the United States, its Underlying Reasons, and its Potential Pitfalls, 29 Energy L. J. 279 (2008)).
  • David G. Loomis & Adrienne Ohler, Are Renewable Portfolio Standards a Policy Cure-All?: A Case Study of Illinois's Experience, 35 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 135 (2010) (citing Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy of Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2008); John Arnold McKinsey, Regulating Avian Impacts Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Other Laws: The Wind Industry Collides with One of its Own, the Environmental Protection Movement, 28 Energy L. J. 71 (2007)).
  • Scott Looper, Take-or-Pay Crisis V2.0: What Wind Power Generators and Providers Failed to Learn from Gas Pipelines' 1980 Dilemma, 33 Hous. J. Int'l L. 303 (2011) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007); John Burrit McArthur, Antitrust in the New [De]Regulated Natural Gas Industry, 18 Energy L.J. 1 (1997)).
  • Sarah G. Lopez, Note, Evaluation of the AOL Time Warner Consent Decree's Ability to Prevent Antitrust Harm in the Cable Broadband ISP Market, 17 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 127 (2003) (citing Submitted Committee Reports: Report of the Antitrust Committee, 22 Energy L.J. 143 (2001)).
  • John S. Lowe, Symposium, Current Lease and Royalty Problems in the Gas Industry, 23 Tulsa L.J. 547 (1988) (citing Shoneman & McConnell, F.E.R.C. Order No. 451: Freedom (Almost) for Old Gas, 7 Energy L.J. 299 (1986); Note, Mississippi's Ratable-Take Rule Preempted: Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp. v. State Oil & Gas Board, 7 Energy L.J. 361 (1986)).  
  • John S. Lowe, Defining the Royalty Obligation, 49 SMU L. Rev. 223 (1996) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988); Mark E. Haedicke, Contracts for the New Natural Gas Business, 13 Energy L.J. 313 (1992)).
  • Alastair R. Lucas, Canada’s Role in the United States’ Oil and Gas Supply Security: Oil Sands, Arctic Gas, NAFTA, and Canadian Kyoto Protocol Impacts, 25 Energy L.J. 403, 420 (2004) (citing Alexander J. Black, Legal Principles Surrounding the New Canadian and American Arctic Energy Debate, 23 Energy L.J. 81 (2002)).
  • Lois R. Lupica, Transition Losses in the Electric Power Market: A Challenge to the Premises Underlying the Arguments for Compensation, 52 Rutgers L. Rev. 649 (2000) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994); Clifford S. Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15 Energy L.J. 273, (1994); Walter R. Hall II, Securitization and Stranded Cost Recovery, 18 Energy L.J. 363 (1997)).
  • J. Lute, LNG Terminals: Future or Folly?, 43 Willamette L. Rev. 621, 661+ (2007) (citing Gearold L. Knowles, Liquefied Natural Gas: Regulation in a Competitive Natural Gas Market, 24 Energy L.J. 293 (2003)).
  • J. Lute, LNG Terminals: Future or Folly ?, 43 Willamette L. Rev. 621, 661+ (2007) (citing Monica Berry, Liquefied Natural Gas Import Terminals: Jurisdiction of Siting, Constructing, and Operation in the Context of Commerce Clause Jurisprudence, 26 Energy L.J. 135 (2005)).
  • J. Lute, LNG Terminals: Future or Folly ?, 43 Willamette L. Rev. 621, 661 (2007) (citing U.S. Sen. James M. Inhofe & Frank Fannon, Energy and the Environment: The Future of Natural Gas in America, 26 Energy L.J. 349 (2005)).
  • Mary L. Lyndon, Secrecy and Access in an Innovation Intensive Economy: Reordering Information Privileges in Environmental, Health, and Safety Law, 78 U. Colo. L. Rev. 465 (2007) (citing Donald F. Santa, Jr., Who Needs What, and Why? Reporting and Disclosure Obligations in Emerging Competitive Electricity Markets, 21 Energy L.J. 1 (2000)).
  • Paul W. MacAvoy, Daniel F. Spulber & Bruce E. Stangle, Is Competitive Entry Free? Bypass and Partial Deregulation in Natural Gas Markets,6 Yale J. on Reg. 209 (1989) (citing Norton & Early, Limitations on the Obligation to Provide Access to Electric Transmission and Distribution Lines, 5 Energy L.J. 47 (1984); Pace, Wheeling and the Obligation to Serve, 8 Energy L.J. 265 (1987); Pace & London, Introducing Competition into the Electric Utility Industry: An Economic Appraisal, 3 Energy L.J. 1 (1982); Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).
  • Marian Macpherson, “. . . To the Gulf Stream Waters”: Stewardship for Essential Fish Habitat, 18 Tul. Envtl. L. J. 97, 140 (2004) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets to Set Electric Rates?, 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003)).
  • Sean P. Madden, Note, Takings Clause Analysis of Utility Ratemaking Decisions: Measuring Hope's Investor Interest Factor, 58 Fordham L. Rev. 427 (1989) (citing Hoecker, "Used and Useful ": Autopsy of a Ratemaking Policy, 8 Energy L.J. 303 (1987)).  
  • M. Elizabeth Magill, Agency Choice of Policy Making Form, 71 U. C hi. L. R ev. 1383 (2004) (citing Nicholas W. Fells, Beyond the Stopwatch: Determining Appellate Venue on Review of FERC Orders, 1 Energy L.J. 35, 45 (1980)).
  • Scott D. Makar, The Essential Facility Doctrine and the Health Care Industry, 21 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 913 (1994) (citing William B. Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).
  • Jeff D. Makholm, "Decoupling" for Energy Distributors: Changing 19th Century Tariff Structures to Address 21st Century Energy Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 157, 172 (2008) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Jeffrey Manns, Building Better Bailouts: The Case for a Long-Term Investment Approach, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1349 (2011) (citing Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Retail Electric Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 Energy L.J. 27 (2000)).
  • Tyler Marandola, Promoting Wind Energy Development Through Antinuisance Legislation, 84 Temp. L. Rev. 955 (2012) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • Emilija Marcinkeviciute, Note & Comment, Energy Charter Treaty Transit Protocol: European Gas Market Liberalization and Its Effect on the European-Russian Gas Trade, 5 Tex. J. Oil, Gas & Energy L. 109 (2009-2010) (citing Yuli Grigoryev, The Russian Gas Industry: Its Legal Structure and Its Influence on World Markets, 28 Energy L.J. 125 (2007); Patricia Fry Eldridge, Russian Energy Legislation: Regulating State Monopolies to Allow the Development of Competitive Markets, 13 Energy L.J. 1 (1992)).
  • J. Michel Marcoux, Penalty Predictability, 148 NO. 7 Pub. Util. Fort. 16 (2010) (citing J. Michel Marcoux, Canaries in the Coal Mine: Facts from Securities Fraud Private Civil Actions Can Identify Intent to Manipulate Energy Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 141 (2008)).
  • J. Michel Marcoux, Penalty Predictability Enhanced, 148 NO. 11 Pub. Util. Fort. 14 (2010) (citing J. Michel Marcoux, Canaries in the Coal Mine: Facts from Securities Fraud Private Civil Actions Can Identify Intent to Manipulate Energy Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 141 (2008)).
  • J. Michel Marcoux, Canaries in the Coal Mine: Facts from Securities Fraud Private Civil Actions Can Identify Intent to Manipulate Energy Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 141, 156 (2008) (citing Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 373 (2006)).
  • Jason Marisam, Duplicative Delegations, 63 Admin. L. Rev. 181 (2011) (citing Jon Wellinghoff et al., Facilitating Hydrokinetic Energy Development Through Regulatory Innovation, 29 Energy L.J. 397 (2008)).
  • Jason Marisam, The Interagency Marketplace, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 886 (2012) (citing Zachary R. F. Schreiner, Comment, Frankenfuel: Genetically Modified Corn, Ethanol, and Crop Diversity, 30 Energy L.J. 169 (2009)).
  • David Markell & J.B. Ruhl, An Empirical Survey of Climate Change Litigation in the United States, 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10644 (2010) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • Jerry W. Markham, Comm. Reg.: Fraud, Manipulation, & Other Claims § 16:10.60, FERC Manipulation Authority (2011) (citing Marcoux, Canaries in the Coal Mine: Facts from Securities Fraud Private Civil Actions Can Identify Intent to Manipulate Energy Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 141 (2008); Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 363 (2006)).
  • Jerry W. Markham, Comm. Reg.: Fraud, Manipulation, & Other Claims § 23:23, Parallel Proceedings, Double Jeopardy and Bankruptcy (2011) (citing Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 363 (2006)).
  • Jerry W. Markham, Comm. Reg.: Fraud, Manipulation, & Other Claims § 23:36, Jurisdictional Issues (2011) (citing Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 363 (2006)).
  • Jerry W. Markham, Comm. Reg.: Fraud, Manipulation, & Other Claims § 28:6, FERC Jurisdiction (2011) (citing Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 363 (2006)).
  • Jerry W. Markham & Daniel J. Harty, For Whom the Bell Tolls: The Demise of Exchange Trading Floors and the Growth of ECNS, 33 J. Corp. L. 865 (2008) (citing Allan Horwich, Warnings to the Unwary: Multi-Jurisdictional Federal Enforcement of Manipulation and Deception in the Energy Markets After the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 27 Energy L.J. 363 (2006)).
  • Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008) (citing John Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008); Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007)).
  • Leigh H. Martin, Note, Deregulatory Takings: Stranded Investments and the Regulatory Compact in a Deregulated Electric Utility Industry, 31 Ga. L. Rev. 1183 (1997) (citing Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995); Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995)).
  • Patrick H. Martin, Symposium, The Proposed Russian Petroleum Conservation and Environmental Protection Law of 1992,15 Hous. J. Int'l L. 499 (1993) (citing Patricia Fry Eldridge, Russian Energy Legislation: Regulating State Monopolies to Allow the Development of Competitive Markets, 13 Energy L.J. 1 (1992)).
  • Robert B. Martin, III, Sherman Shorts Out: The Dimming of Antitrust Enforcement in the California Electricity Crisis, 55 Hastings L.J. 271 (2003) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the “Perfect Storm”, 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001)).
  • Stephanie A. Martz, Note, Legalized Gambling and Public Corruption: Removing the Incentive to Act Corruptly, or, Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks, 13 J.L. & Pol. 453 (1997) (citing Robert L. Bradley, Jr., The Origins of Political Electricity: Market Failure or Political Opportunism?, 17 Energy L.J. 59 (1996)).
  • Gabe Maser, It's Electric, but Ferc's Cost-Causation Boogie-Woogie Fails to Justify Socialized Costs for Renewable Transmission, 100 Geo. L.J. 1829 (2012) (citing Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel Aslin Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543 (2007).
  • Crystal D. Masterson, Comment, Wind-Energy Ventures in Indian Country: Fashioning a Functional Paradigm, 34 Am. Indian L. Rev. 317 (2010) (citing Darrell Blakeway & Carol Brotman White, Tapping the Power of Wind: FERC Initiatives to Facilitate Transmission of Wind Power, 26 Energy L.J. 393 (2005)).
  • Magali Matarazzi, Comment, Selecting a Corporate Form: Foreign Direct Investment in Vietnam's Oil and Gas Industry Under the 1995 Land Law, 19 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 364 (1999) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Olen Paul Matthews & Michael Pease, The Commerce Clause, Interstate Compacts, and Marketing Water Across State Boundaries, 46 Nat. Resources J. 601, 656 (2006) (citing Monica Berry, Liquefied Natural Gas Import Terminals: Jurisdiction of Siting, Constructing, and Operation in the Context of Commerce Clause Jurisprudence, 26 Energy L.J. 135 (2005)).
  • Jay Matson, Lights Out: Ten Myths About (and Real Solutions to) America's Energy Crisis by Spencer Abraham (with William Tucker), St. Martin's Press 2010, 31 Energy L.J. 565 (2010) (citing Jonathan D. Schneider, So, the World Is Getting Warmer: What Now? New Literature on Electric Sector Options and the Cost of Climate Control Legislation, 30 Energy L.J. 553 (2009)).
  • Sara Mattern, Municipal Energy Benchmarking Legislation for Commercial Buildings: You Can't Manage What You Don't Measure, 40 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 487 (2013) (citing Benjamin K. Sovacool, Running on Empty: The Electricity-Water Nexus and the U.S. Electric Utility Sector, 30 Energy L.J. 11, 39 (2009)).
  • Bradley W. Maudlin, Comment, Oil and Gas Law: State Production Regulation Under the Natural Gas Act Revisited Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Commission, 29 Washburn L.J. 123 (1989) (citing  Note, Mississippi's Ratable-Take Rule Preempted: Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp. v. State Oil and Gas Board, 7 Energy L.J. 361 (1986)).
  • Brian E. Maxted, Developing Wind Power in the Commonwealth: No Longer a Quixotic Quest to Build Wind Farms in Virginia, 33 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 319 (2008) (citing John Arnold McKinsey, Regulating Avian Impacts Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Other Laws: The Wind Industry Collides with One of its Own, the Environmental Protection Movement, 28 Energy L.J. 71 (2007)).
  • David S. May, Monopolies and Environment, 11-SUM Nat. Resources & Env't 42 (1996) (citing Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 349 (1995); citing Navarro, 16 Energy L.J. at 380; Michaels & DeVany, Market-Based Rates for Interstate Gas Pipelines: The Relevant Market and the Real Market, 16 Energy L.J. 299 (1995)).
  • John Burritt McArthur, The Mutual Benefit Implied Covenant for Oil and Gas Royalty Owners, 41 Nat. Resources J. 795 (2001) (citing John Burritt McArthur, Antitrust in the [De]Regulated Natural Gas Industry, 18 Energy L.J. 1 (1997)).
  • John Burritt McArthur, Cost Responsibility or Regulatory Indulgence for Electricity's Stranded Cost?,47 Am. U. L. Rev. 775 (1998) (citing Richard Pierce, The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994) ; Clifford Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will The Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15 Energy L.J. 273 (1994); Raymond Hartman, The Efficiency Effects of Electric Utility Mergers: Lessons From Statistical Cost Analysis, 17 Energy L.J. 425 (1996)).
  • John Burritt McArthur, The Irreconcilable Differences Between FERC's Natural Gas and Electricity Stranded Cost Treatments, 46 Buff. L. Rev. 71 (1998) (citing James Hoecker, Used and Useful: Autopsy of a Ratemaking Policy, 8 Energy L.J. 303 (1987); Clifford Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15  Energy L.J. 273 (1994); Richard Pierce, The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994)).
  • John Burritt McArthur, Coming of Age: Initiating the Oilfield into Performance Disclosure, 50 SMU L. Rev. 663 (1997) (citing Donald F. Santa, Jr. & Patricia J. Beneke, Federal Natural Gas Policy and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, 14 Energy L.J. 1 (1993)).
  • John Burritt McArthur, The Class Action Tool in Oilfield Litigation, 45 U. Kan. L. Rev. 113 (1996) (citing Cody Graves & Maria Seidler, The Regulation of Gathering in a Federal System, 15 Energy L.J. 405 (1994)).  
  • John Burritt McArthur & Rick Harper, Global Warming, the Regulations Ahead, and the Oil and Gas Industry, 48 Nat. Resources J. 745 (2008) (citing John Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008); Panel Discussion, EBA Climate Change Primer: Cap and Trade, 29 Energy L.J. 173 (2008)).
  • Melanie McCammon, Environmental Perspectives on Siting Wind Farms: Is Greater Federal Control Warranted?, 17 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 1243 (2009) (citing John Arnold McKinsey, Regulating Avian Impacts Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Other Laws: The Wind Industry Collides with One of Its Own, the Environmental Protection Movement, 28 Energy L.J. 71 (2007)).
  • Patricia Ross McCubbin, China and Climate Change: Domestic Environmental Needs, Differentiated International Responsibilities, and Rule of Law Weaknesses, 3 Envt'l & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 200 (2008) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • Barbara McDonald, How a Nineteenth Century Indian Treaty Stopped a Twenty-First Century Megabomb, 9 Nev. L.J. 749 (2009) (citing Andrew J. Butcher, Note, In Search of a Remedy to the Nuclear Storage Conundrum: Western Shoshone National Council v. United States, 28 Energy L.J. 207 (2007)).
  • Thomas O. McGarity, Multi-Party Forum Shopping for Appellate Review of Administrative Action, 129 U. Pa. L. Rev. 302 (1980) (citing Fels, Beyond the Stopwatch: Determining Appellate Venue on Review of FERC Orders, 1 Energy L.J. 35 (1980)).
  • Patrick McGinley, Collateral Damage: Turning A Blind Eye to Environmental and Social Injustice in the Coalfields, 19 J. Envtl. & Sustainability L. 305 (2013) (citing Robert R. Nordhaus, Modernizing The Clean Air Act: Is There Life After 40?, 33 ENERGY L.J. 365 (2012)).
  • Matthew R. McGuire, (Mis)understanding "Undue Discrimination": Ferc's Misguided Effort to Extend the Boundaries of the Federal Power Act, 19 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 549 (2012) (citing Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Retail Electric Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 Energy L.J. 27 (2000); Donald F. Santa, Jr. & Clifford S. Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 25 Energy L.J. 113 (2004); Joshua Z. Rokach, FERC's Jurisdiction Under Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, 15 Energy L.J 83 (1994); Clinton A. Vince & John S. Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation in a Post-Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J 1 (1989); Debbie Swanstrom & Meredith M. Jolivert, DOE Transmission Corridor Designations & FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities?, 30 Energy L.J. 415 (2009)).
  • Richard McKenna & Ward W. Wueste, Jr., An Answer to Professor Pierce: How Utility Regulation Can Be Reformed in Harmony with Constitutional Principles, 27 Cal. W. L. Rev. 81 (1990-1991) (citing Darr, The Constitutional  Limits on Ratemaking: A Response to William [Walter] Pond, 11 Energy L.J. 53 (1990)).
  • Steve McKinney, Nuggets, 12 Summer Nat. Resources & Env’t 73 (1997) (reviewing K.W. Costello & J.R. Lemon, Unbundling Small Customer Services: New Challenges for State Public Utility Commissions, 18 Energy L.J. 137 (1997)).
  • Steve McKinney, Nuggets, 10 Spring Nat. Resources & Env’t 68 (1996) (reviewing P. Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electric Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995); R.J. Michael & A.S. DeVany, Market-Based Rates for Interstate Gas Pipelines: The Relevant Market and the Real Market, 16 Energy L.J. 299 (1995)).
  • Steve McKinney, Nuggets, 10 Winter Nat. Resources & Env’t 68 (1996) (reviewing J.W. Moeller, Electric Utilities and Telecommunications, 16 Energy L.J. 95 (1995)).  
  • Steve McKinney, Electricity, 9 Spring Nat. Resources & Env’t 61 (1995) (reviewing Hon. R.J. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994)).
  • Steve McKinney, Energy, 9 Spring Nat. Resources & Env’t 61 (1995) (reviewing R.J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994)).
  • Steve McKinney, Periodicals, 9 Winter Nat. Resources & Env’t 61 (1995) (reviewing C.L. Graves & M.M. Seidler, The Regulation of Gathering in a Federal System, 15 Energy L.J. 405 (1994); D.F. Santa & C.S. Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15 Energy L.J. 273 (1994)).
  • Steve McKinney, Electricity, 9 Summer Nat. Resources & Env’t 37 (1994) (reviewing J.S. Moot, The Changing Focus of Electric Utility Merger Proceedings, 15 Energy L.J. 1 (1994); J.Z. Rokach, FERC’s Jurisdiction Under Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, 15 Energy L.J. 83 (1994)).
  • Steve McKinney, Electricity, 8 Spring Nat. Resources & Env’t 46 (1994) (reviewing L.J. Spiwak, Expanding the FERC’s Jurisdiction to Review Utility Mergers, 14 Energy L.J. 385 (1993)).
  • Amanda R. McKinzie, Did We Really Take Advice from a Chicken? The Failure of the Dodd-Frank Act Say-On-Pay Provision,, 45 Tex. Tech L. Rev. Online Edition 33 (2013) (citing Walter Hall et al., Report of the Finance & Transactions Committee, 32 Energy L.J. 323 (2011)).
  • Thomas R. McLean, Telemedicine and the Commoditization of Medical Services, 10 DePaul J. Health Care L. 131, 175+ (2007) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Heather McLeod-Kilmurray & Gavin Smith, Unsustainable Development in Canada: Environmental Assessment, Cost-Benefit Analysis, and Environmental Justice in the Tar Sands, 21 J. of Envtl. L. and Practice (Canada) 65 (2010) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 28 Energy L. J. 1 (2008)).
  • Stephen R. McNamara, Symposium, Oklahoma's Production Revenue Standards Act Post FERC Order 636 -- Measurement, Delivery and Quantity Issues, 29 Tulsa L.J. 639 (1994) (citing Philip M. Marston, Pipeline Restructuring: The Future Of Open-Access Transportation, 12 Energy L.J. 53 (1991)).
  • Sean J. McNulty, Comment, Freeing the Captives: Nondiscriminatory Access to Transportation in the Interstate Natural Gas Market, 47 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 843 (1986) (citing Mogel & Gregg, Appropriateness of Imposing Common Carrier Status on Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, 4 Energy L.J. 155 (1983); Means & Angyal, The Regulation and Future Role of Direct Producer Sales, 5 Energy L.J. 1 (1984); Tiano & Bonnifield, The Impact on Gas Distribution Companies of Federally Approved Special Marketing Programs, 5 Energy L.J. 287 (1984)).
  • Robert Means & Deborah Cohn, Common Carriage of Natural Gas, 59 Tul. L. Rev. 529 (1985) (citing Mogel and Gregg, Appropriateness of Imposing Common Carrier Status on Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, 4 Energy L.J. 155 (1983); Means & Angyal, The Regulation and Future Role of Direct Producer Sales, 5 Energy L.J. 1 (1984); Mahinka & Johnson, New Antitrust Issues in a Deregulated Environment: Access to Pipelines, 44 Energy L.J. 211 (1983)).
  • Martin F. Medeiros, Note, A Permissive Wheeling Scheme: Qualifying Facility Transmission Access Strategies and the Energy Policy Act of 1992,28 Tulsa L.J. 521 (1993) (citing Megan A. Wallace, A Negotiated Alternative to Mandatory Wheeling, 10 Energy L.J. 99 (1989)).
  • J. Michael Medina, The Take-or-Pay Wars: A Cautionary Analysis for the Future, 27 Tulsa L.J. 283 (1991) (citing John S. Lowe, Severance Taxes as an Issue of Energy Sectionalism, 5 Energy L.J. 357 (1984); Al H. Ringleb et al., Natural Gas Contract Periodic Price Redeterminations: A Statistical Methodology with Preliminary Empirical Results, 10 Energy L.J. 81 (1989)).  
  • Thomas W. Merrill, Four Questions About Fracking, 63 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 971 (2013) (citing Christopher J. Barr, Unfinished Business, FERC's Evolving Standard for Capacity Rights on Oil Pipelines, 32 Energy L.J. 563 (2011)).
  • Thomas W. Merrill, Colloquium, Incomplete Compensation for Takings, 11 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 110 (2002) (citing Thomas R. Stauffer, Valuation of Assets in International Takings, 17 Energy L.J. 459, 461 (1996)).
  • Christopher J. Mertens, Australian Insolvency Law and the 1992 ISDA Master Agreement-Catalyst, Reaction, and Solution, 15 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J. 233 (2006) (citing Andrew S. Katz, Using the EEI-NEM Master Contract to Manage Power Marketing Risks, 21 Energy L. J. 269 (2000)).
  • Alexandra I. Metzner, Comment, Were California's Electricity Price Shocks Nothing More Than a New Form of Stranded Costs?,52 Am. U. L. Rev. 535 (2002) (citing Ajay Gupta, Tracking Stranded Costs, 21 Energy L.J. 113 (2000); James J. Hoecker, "Used and Useful": Autopsy of a Ratemaking Policy, 8 Energy L.J. 303 (1987); Walter R. Hall, II, Securitization and Stranded Cost Recovery, 18 Energy L.J. 363 (1997)).
  • John R. Meyer & William B. Tye, Toward Achieving Workable Competition in Industries Undergoing a Transition to Deregulation: A Contractual Equilibrium Approach, 5 Yale J. on Reg. 273 (1988) (citing Mahinka & Johnson, New Antitrust Issues in a Deregulated Environment: Access to Pipelines, 4 Energy L.J. 211 (1983); Mogel & Gregg, Appropriateness of Imposing Common Carrier Status on Natural Gas Pipelines, 4 Energy L.J. 155 (1983); Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).  
  • Tiffany A. Miao, Access Denied: How Social Media Accounts Fall Outside the Scope of Intellectual Property Law and into the Realm of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 23 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 1017 (2013) (citing Carolyn Elefant, The “Power” of Social Media: Legal Issues & Best Practices for Utilities Engaging in Social Media, 32 Energy L. J. 1 (2011)).
  • Brandon M. Middleton, Restoring Tradition: The Inapplicability of TVA v. Hill's Endangered Species Act Injunctive Relief Standard to Preliminary Injunctive Relief of Non-Federal Actors, 17 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 318 (2010) (citing Malori Dahmen, Note, CWA and the ESA: Nine Is a Party, Ten Is a Crowd, 29 Energy L.J. 703 (2008)).
  • Marc B. Mihaly, Recovery of a Lost Decade (Or Is It Three?): Developing the Capacity in Government Necessary to Reduce Carbon Emissions and Administer Energy Markets, 88 Or. L. Rev. 405 (2009) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The Bell Tolls for Hydrocarbons: What's Next?, 29 Energy L.J. 381 (2008); Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007); Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel Aslin Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543 (2007)).
  • Steven R. Miles, Note, Full-Avoided Cost Pricing Under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act: "Just And Reasonable" to Electric Consumers?,69 Cornell L. Rev. 1267 (1984) (citing PURPA and the Impact of Recent Developments on Transactions Between Electric Utilities and Cogeneration and Small Power Production Facilities, 3 Energy L.J.  273 (1982); Tiano & Zimmer, Wheeling for Cogeneration, 3 Energy L.J. 95 (1982); Pace & Landon, Introducing Competition into the Electric Industry: An Economic Appraisal, 3 Energy L.J. 1 (1982)).
  • Christopher J. Miller, Carbon Capture and Sequestration in Texas: Navigating the Legal Challenges Related to Pore Space Ownership, 6 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L. 399 (2011) (citing Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008)).
  • Cody Miller, Petroleum Exports from Latin America to the United States, 10-FALL L. & Bus. Rev. Am. 819 (2004) (citing Jay G. Martin, Venezuela as an Opportunity for Investment in the Petroleum Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 325 (1999)).
  • Girard P. Miller, Developers See Green and Neighbors See Red: A Survey of Incentives and Mandates for the Development of Alternative Energy and the Unfolding Challenges, 3 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L 117 (2008) (citing John Arnold McKinsey, Regulating Avian Impacts Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Other Laws: The Wind Industry Collides with One of Its Own, the Environmental Protection Movement, 28 Energy L.J. 71 (2007)).
  • Kerri M. Millikan, Energy Law, 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 937 (1999) (citing Report of the Judicial Review Committee, 19 Energy L.J. 207 (1998)).  
  • Ronald E. Minsk et al., Plugging Cars into the Grid: Why the Government Should Make a Choice, 30 Energy L.J. 317 (2009) (citing Monika Ehrman, Competition Is a Sin: An Evaluation of the Formation and Effects of a Natural Gas OPEC, 27 Energy L.J. 175 (2006)).
  • Martin Miranda, The Legal Obstacles to Foreign Direct Investment in Mexico's Oil Sector, 33 Fordham Int'l L.J. 206 (2009) (citing Emilio Carrillo Gamboa, Proposed Changes for the Mexican Electric Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 281 (1999)).
  • Sara Mischner, It's About Time: A Proposal to Establish a Specialized International Agency for Coal Miner Safety and Health, 26 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 583 (2009) (citing Robert W. Gee et al., China's Power Sector: Global Economic and Environmental Implications, 28 Energy L.J. 421 (2007)).
  • Brady Mitchell, Note, Unfair Discrimination or Necessary for Equal Opportunity? The ECJ Upholds Positive Action in Lommers v. Minister Van Landbouw, 26 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 469, 481 (2004) (citing Report of the International Energy Transactions Committee, 24 Energy L.J. 429 (2003)).
  • Rachel A. Mitchell, Note and Comment, The Electricity Directive of the European Union: What Can the Member States Learn from the Experiences of Privatized England and Wales?,14 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 761 (1999) (citing James Barker, Jr. et al., Regulation of Power Pools and System Operators: An International Comparison, 18 Energy L.J. 216).   
  • James W. Moeller , Of Credits and Quotas: Federal Tax Incentives for Renewable Resources, State Renewable Portfolio Standards, and the Evolution of Proposals for a Federal Renewable Portfolio Standard, 15 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 69, 189 (2004) (citing Peter Navarro & Michael Shames, Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned from California, 24 Energy L.J. 23 (2003)).
  • William A. Mogel & Shuchi Batra, The New Balance of Power, Vol. 145 No. 6 Pub. Util. Fort. 36 (2007) (citing Jacob Dweck, David Wochner & Michael Brooks, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006)).
  • Eben Moglen & Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Sustein's New Canons: Choosing the Fictions of Statutory Interpretation, 57 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1203  (1990) (citing Joe D. Pace, Wheeling and the Obligation to Serve, 8 Energy L.J. 265 (1987); William B. Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J..; John Wyeth Griggs, Competitive Bidding and Independent Power Producers: Is Deregulation Coming to the Electric  Utility Industry?, 9 Energy L.J. 415 (1988); Leonard L. Coburn, Oil Pipeline Regulation: Has the FERC Finally Slain the Minotaur?, 6 Energy L.J. 209 (1985); Leonard L. Coburn, Farmers Union II: Sisyphus Starts Up the Hill Again, 5 Energy L.J. 309 (1984)).  
  • James W. Moeller, Interstate Electric Transmission Lines and States' Rights in the Mid-Atlantic Region, 40 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 77 (2013) (citing John S. Moot, Economic Theories of Regulation and Electricity Restructuring, 25 Energy L.J. 273 (2004)).
  • James W. Moeller, Of Credits and Quotas: Federal Tax Incentives for Renewable Resources, State Renewable Portfolio Standards, and the Evolution of Proposals for a Federal Renewable Portfolio Standard, 15 Fordham Envtl L. Rev. 69 (2004) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the “Perfect Storm,” 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001)).
  • Jonas J. Monast, Brooks R. Pearson, Lincoln F. Pratson, A Cooperative Federalism Framework for Ccs Regulation, 7 Envt'l & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 1 (2012) (citing J.W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured From Coal-fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2008); Robert R. Nordhaus and Emily Pitlick, Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Regulation, 30 Energy L.J. 1 (2009)).
  • Remi Moncel, Unconstructive Ambiguity in the Durban Climate Deal of Cop 17 / Cmp 7, 12 Sustainable Dev. L. & Pol'y 6 (2012) (citing Report of the Environmental Regulation Commission, 32 Energy L.J. 637 (2011)).
  • Jeffrey W. Moore, How Sports Can Benefit Communities Burdened by Brownfields, 8 Va. Sports & Ent. L.J. 1 (2008) (citing Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007)).
  • Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007) (citing Leslie R. Dubois, Comment, Curiosity and Carbon: Examining the Future of Carbon Sequestration and the Accompanying Jurisdictional Issues as Outlined in the Indian Energy Title of the 2005 Energy Policy Act, 27 Energy L.J. 603 (2006)).
  • John S. Moot, Compliance Programs, Penalty Mitigation and the FERC, 29 Energy L.J. 547 (2008) (citing Joseph T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power and the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1 (2005)).
  • John S. Moot, Whither Order No. 888, 26 Energy L.J. 327, 347 (2005) (citing Hon. Josephy T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, and the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1(2005)).
  • John S. Moot, Whither Order No. 888?, 26 Energy L.J. 327, 347 (2005) (citing John S. Moot, Economic Theories of Regulation and Electricity Restructuring, 25 Energy L.J. 273 (2004)).
  • Jivaji Moré, Come Shale Away: Navigating the "Business Friendliness" of Regulatory Environments in the Marcellus Shale and Albertan Oil Sands, 33 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 393 (2013) (citing Lynn Kerr McKay et al., Science and the Reasonable Development of Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Resources in Pennsylvania and New York, 32 Energy L.J. 125 (2011)).
  • Felix Mormann, Enhancing the Investor Appeal of Renewable Energy, 42 Envtl. L. 681 (2012) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L. J. 79 (2008); Mary Ann Ralls, Congress Got it Right: There's no Need to Mandate Renewable Portfolio Standards, 27 Energy L. J. 451 (2006); Jeffery S. Dennis et al., Report of the Renewable Energy & Demand-Side Management Committee, 31 Energy L.J. 287 (2010)).
  • Andrew P. Morriss, Real People, Real Resources, and Real Choices: The Case for Market Valuation of Water, 38 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 973 (2006) (citing Richard J. Pierce, The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994)).
  • Andrew P. Morriss & Nathaniel Stewart, Market Fragmenting Regulation Why Gasoline Costs So Much (and Why It's Going to Cost More), 72 Brook. L. Rev. 939, 1060 (2007) (citing John S. Moot, Economic Theories of Regulation and Electricity Restructuring, 25 Energy L.J. 273 (2004)).
  • Adam J. Moser, Pragmatism Not Dogmatism: The Inconvenient Need for Border Adjustment Tariffs Based on What Is Known About Climate Change, Trade, and China, 12 Vt. J. Envtl L. 675 (2011) (citing Richard Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 25 Energy L.J. 161 (2004)).
  • Diana L. Moss, Electricity and Market Power: Current Issues for Restructuring Markets (A Survey), 1 Envtl. & Energy L. & Pol’y J. 11, 28 (2005) (citing Peter Fox-Penner, Gary Taylor, Romkaew Broehm & James Bohn, Competition in Wholesale Electric Power Markets, 23 Energy L.J. 281 (2002)).
  • Diana Moss, Electricity and Market Power: Current Issues for Restructuring Markets (A Survey), 1 Envtl & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 11, 41 (2005) (citing Michael J. Gergen, George D. Cannon, Jr. & David G. Tewksbury, Market-Based Ratemaking and the Western Energy Crisis of 2000 and 2001, 24 Energy L.J. 321 (2003)).
  • Giuditta Cordero Moss, Contract or Licence? Regulation of Petroleum Investment in Russia and Foreign Legal Advice, 13 Transnat’l  L. & Contemp. Probs. 519 (2003) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Jeff Mosteller, Comment, The Current and Future Climate of Airline Consolidation: The Possible Impact of an Alliance of Two Large Airlines and an Examination of the Proposed American Airlines-British Airways Alliance,64 J. Air L. & Com. 575 (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).
  • Russell Moy, Tort Law Considerations for the Hydrogen Economy, 24 Energy L.J. 349, 361 (2003) (citing Frederick Moring, Jeremy Rifkin’s The Hydrogen Economy, 24 Energy L.J. 151 (2003) (Book Review)).
  • James Muenker, Oil and Gas: Roye Realty & Developing v. Watson - An Answer to the Take-or-Pay Royalty Issue in Oklahoma or Simply More Confusion?,49 Okla. L. Rev. 751 (1996) (citing Donald F. Santa, Jr. & Patricia J. Beneke, Federal Natural Gas Policy and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, 14 Energy L.J. 1 (1993)).  
  • Michael A. Mullett, Symposium, Financing for Eternity the Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel: A Crisis of Law and Policy Precipitated by Electric Deregulation Will Face New President, 18 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 383 (2001) (citing Michael A. Bauser, Comment, Recent Decisions Concerning the DOE's Commercial Radioactive Waste Disposal Program, 19 Energy L.J. 387 (1998)).
  • LoValerie Mullins, The Equity Illusion of Surface Ownership in Coalbed Methane Gas; The Rise of Mutual Simultaneous Rights in Mineral Law and the Resulting Need for Dispute Resolution in Split Estate Relations, 16 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 109 (2009) (citing Stacy L. Leeds, Note, Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Company: Judicial Construction of Coalbed Methane Gas Ownership, 17 Energy L.J. 489 (1996)).
  • Russell L. Munsch, Avoiding Pitfalls in Bankruptcy: Advanced Issues in Avoidance Litigation, 090904 Am. Bankr. Inst. 8 (2004) (citing Report of the Finance and Transactions Committee, 23 Energy L.J. 541 (2002)).
  • Michael S. Munson, Averting Nuclear 9/11: The Need to Move Beyond NEPA and Transition to a Homeland Security-Administered Infrastructure Security Statement, 35 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 335 (2010) (citing Scott R. Helton, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179 (2002)).
  • Timothy J. Muris & Bilal K. Sayyed, The Long Shadow of Standard Oil: Policy, Petroleum, and Politics at the Federal Trade Commission, 85 S. Cal. L. Rev. 843 (2012) (citing Theodore A. Gebhard & James F. Mongoven, Prohibiting Fraud and Deception in Wholesale Petroleum Markets: The New Federal Trade Commission Market Manipulation Rule, 31 Energy L.J. 125 (2010)).
  • Lauren  Murphree, A Wind(ow) of Opportunity: Why Texas is in the Best Position to Develop Offshore Wind Energy,, 45 Tex. Tech L. Rev. Online Edition 73 (2013) (citing Report of the Renewable Energy Committee, 32 Energy L.J. 405, 417 (2011)).
  • Ewell E. Murphy, Jr., The Prospect for Further Energy Privatization in Mexico, 36 Tex. Int'l L.J. 75 (2001) (citing Emilio Carrillo Gamboa, Proposed Changes for the Mexican Electric Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 281 (1999)).
  • Patrick J. Murphy, Gone Fission: Federal Preemption and the Resurgence of the Nuclear Industry (the One That Almost Got Away), 82 Temp. L. Rev. 863 (2009) (citing Roland M. Frye, Jr., The Current “Nuclear Renaissance” in the United States, Its Underlying Reasons, and Its Potential Pitfalls, 29 Energy L.J. 279 (2008)).
  • Jason B. Myers, Symposium, The Sale of Electricity in a Deregulated Industry: Should Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code Govern?,54 SMU L. Rev. 1051 (2001) (citing Mark E. Haedicke, Competitive-Based Contracts for the New Power Business, 17 Energy L.J. 103 (1996)).
  • John Copeland Nagle, From Swamp Drainage to Wetlands Regulation to Ecological Nuisances to Environmental Ethics, 58 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 787 (2008) (citing Stephen Jay Stokes, The Limit of Government’s Regulatory Authority over Non-Adjacent Wetlands: Hoffman Homes, Inc. v. EPA, 15 Energy L.J. 137 (1994)).
  • Norene Napper, Water Law-States' Rights and Riparian Rights-Riparian Jurisdiction: Ordinary and Usual v. Extraordinary: New Jersey v. Delaware, 128 S. Ct. 1410 (2008)., 76 Tenn. L. Rev. 187 (2008) (citing  Jacob Dweck, David Wochner & Michael Brooks, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006)).
  • Marcia Narine, Whistleblowers and Rogues: An Urgent Call for an Affirmative Defense to Corporate Criminal Liability, 62 Cath. U. L. Rev. 41 (2012) (citing John S. Moot, Compliance Programs, Penalty Mitigation and the FERC, 29 Energy L.J. 547 (2008)).
  • Jonathan J. Nasca, Just Scratching the Surface: How EPA Denied Renewable Energy Developers the Liability Protection They Need to Repower America's Contaminated Land, 41 Hofstra L. Rev. 267 (2012) (citing Jonathan A. Lesser, The Used and Useful Test: Implications for a Restructured Electric Industry, 23 Energy L.J. 349 (2002); Michael D. Hornstein & J.S. Gebhart Stoermer, The Energy Policy Act of 2005: PURPA Reform, The Amendments and Their Implications, 27 Energy L.J. 25 (2006)).
  • Peter Navarro, The Simple Analytics Of Performance-Based Ratemaking: A Guide For The Pbr Regulator, 13 Yale J. on Reg. 105 (1996) (citing Peter Navarro, The Restructuring Regulator: A Guidebook and Research Agenda For the Electric Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 2 (1996)).  
  • Peter Navarro and Michael Sharnes , Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned From California, 24 Energy L.J. 33, 38 (2003) (citing Peter Fox-Penner, Gary Taylor, Romkaew Broehm, and James Bohn, Competition in Wholesale Electric Power Markets, 23 Energy L.J. 281 (2002)).
  • Cathryn Neaves, Proper Legal Analysis, Improper Result: Recent History Of Judicial Preemption Interpretation Of The Federal Power Act And Natural Gas Act, 23 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 829 (1989) (citing Duffy, Will the Supreme Court Lose Patience With Prudence? 9 Energy L.J. 83 (1988); Hobelman, The Narragansett Decision and Its Aftermath, 6 Energy L.J. 33 (1985)).
  • Sheila M. Needles, Riding on the CERCLA-Cycle: Is the Third Circuit Backpedaling? E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. U.S., 15 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 555 (2008) (citing Marina K. Greek, Will the CERCLA be Unbroken? E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. U.S., 28 Energy L.J. 681 (2007)).
  • Larry Nettles & Mary Conner, Carbon Dioxide Sequestration-Transportation, Storage, and Other Infrastructure Issues, 4 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L 27 (2009) (citing Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007)).
  • R. Richard Newcomb, Canada-United States Energy, Trade, Security, and Policy, 34 Can.-U.S. L.J. 81 (2010) (citing J. Michel Marcoux, Canaries in the Coal Mine: Facts from Securities Fraud Private Civil Actions Can Identify Intent to Manipulate Energy Markets, 29 Energy L. J. 141 (2008); EBA Climate Change Primer: Financing a Renewable Project, 29 Energy L.J. 195 (2008); Christopher J. Barr, Growing Pains: FERC's Responses to Challenges to the Development of Oil Pipeline Infrastructure, 28 Energy L.J. 43 (2007); Sara Mischner, It's About Time: A Proposal To Establish A Specialized International Agency For Coal Miner Safety And Health, 26 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 583, 618 (2009) (citing Robert W. Gee et al., China's Power Sector: Global Economic and Environmental Implications, 28 Energy L.J. 421 (2007)).
  • Elizabeth Newlin Taylor, Note, Pushing State Regulatory Commissions Behind The Bright Line: FERC Jurisdiction Prevails In Mississippi Power & Light Co. V. Mississippi Ex Rel. Moore, 487 U.S.354, 108 S. Ct. 2428 (1988), 29 Nat. Resources J. 607 (1989) (citing Duffy, Will the Supreme Court Lose Patience with Prudence? 9 Energy  L.J. 83, 896 (1988); Ercolano, Narragansett Update: From Washington Gas Light to Nantahala, 7 Energy L.J. 333 (1986); Nelson, The Chevron Deference Rule and Judicial Review of FERC Orders, 9 Energy L.J. 59 (1988)).
  • Nichols Cyclopedia of Legal Forms Annotatated, 145:490. Sale to pipeline company (2008) (citing Christopher J. Barr, Growing Pains: Ferc's Responses to Challenges to the Development of Oil Pipeline Infrastructure, 28 Energy L.J. 43 (2007)).
  • Nichols Cyclopedia of Legal Forms Annotated 4.1901. Research Checklist (2007) (citing William H. Hieronymus, J. Stephen Henderson, and Carolyn A. Berry, Market Power Analysis of the Electricity Generation Sector, 23 Energy L.J. 1 (2002)).
  • Nichols Cyclopedia of Legal Forms Annotated, 4.1901. Research Checklist (2007) (citing Craig R. Roach, Ph.D., Measuring Market Power in the U.S. Electricity Business, 23 Energy L.J. 51 (2002)).
  • Philip M. Nichols, The Business Case for Complying with Bribery Laws, 49 Am. Bus. L.J. 325 (2012) (citing Alexander J. Black, Legal Principles Surrounding the New Canadian and American Arctic Energy Debate, 23 Energy L.J. 81 (2002)).
  • Terra Nicolay, Regulation by Any Other Name: Electricity Deregulation in Alberta and the Power Purchase Arrangements, 29 NO. 1 J. Energy & Nat. Resources L. 45 (2011) (citing Peter Navarro and Michael Shames, Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned from California, 24 Energy L.J. 33 (2003)).
  • Benjamin H. Nissim, A Mutually Beneficial Relationship: How the Low-Profit Limited Liability Company Can Build A Brand and Grow America's Wind Energy Infrastructure, 27 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 247 (2013) (citing Neil Peretz, Growing the Energy Efficiency Market Through Third-Party Financing, 30 Energy L.J. 377 (2009)).
  • Kendra Emi Nitta, Note and Comment, An Ethical Evaluation Of Mandatory Pro Bono, 29 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 909 (1996) (citingCommittee on Ethics, Report of the Committee on Ethics, 15 Energy L.J. 193 (1994)).
  • John Noor, Herding Cats: What to Do when States Get in the Way of National Energy Policy, 11 N.C. J. L. & Tech. 145 (2009) (citing Darrell Blakeway & Carol Brotman White, Tapping The Power of Wind: FERC Initiatives to Facilitate Transmission of Wind Power, 26 Energy L.J. 393 (2005)).
  • Peter Carl Nordberg, Excuse Me, Sir, but Your Climate's on Fire: California's S.B. 1368 and the Dormant Commerce Clause, 82 Notre Dame L. Rev. 2067 (2007) (citing Nicholas W. Fels & Frank R. Lindh, Lessons from the California “Apocalypse”: Jurisdiction Over Electric Utilities, 22 Energy L.J. 1 (2001)).
  • Robert R. Norhaus & Emily Pitlick, Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Regulation, 30 Energy L.J. 85 (2009) (citing Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008)).
  • Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets to Set Electric Rates? , 24 Energy L.J. 65, 65 (2003) (citing Peter Fox-Penner, Gary Taylor, Romkaew Broehm, and James Bohn, Competition in Wholesale Electric Power Markets, 23 Energy L.J. 281 (2002)).
  • Kelsey Jae Nunez, Gridlock on the Road to Renewable Energy Development: A Discussion About the Opportunities & Risks Presented by the Modernization Requirements of the Electricity Transmission Network, 1 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 137, 179+ (2007) (citing Darrell Blakeway and Carol Brotman White, Tapping the Power of Wind: FERC Initiatives to Facilitate Transmission of Wind Power, 26 Energy L.J. 393 (2005)).
  • Kevin O’Brien, Nuclear Power-Dawn of a New Life?, 1 NO 2 The American College of Construction Lawyers Journal 8 (2012) (citing Scott R. Helton, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179 (2002)).
  • Olivia Odom, Energy v. Water, 37 Ecology L.Q. 353 (2010) (citing Benjamin K. Sovacool, Running on Empty: The Electricity-Water Nexus and the U.S. Electric Utility Sector, 30 Energy L.J. 11 (2009)).
  • 18 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 1021 (2003) Bibliography Issue Article Entries Alphbetized By Author Last Name  (citing Scott R. Helton, Comment, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179 (2002)).
  • 18 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 1021, 1062 (2003), Article Entries Alphabetized by Author Last Name, (citing Scott R. Helton, Comment, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179 (2002)).
  • Brian Orion, Transmission in Transition: Analyzing California's Proposed Electricity Transmission Regulatory Reforms, 56 Hastings L.J. 343 (2004) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the “Perfect Storm,” 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001)).
  • Daniel T. Ostas & Frank P. Darr, Understanding Commercial Impracticability: Tempering Efficiency With Community Fairness Norms, 27 Rutgers L.J. 343 (1996) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the National Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).  
  • Ashira Pelman Ostrow, Land Law Federalism, 61 Emory L.J. 1397 (2012) (citing Jacob Dweck et al., Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006); James C. Erdle, Jr., Note, Controlling LNG: AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC v. Smith, 527 F.3d 120 (4th Cir. 2008), 29 Energy L.J. 695 (2008)).
  • Uma Outka, The Renewable Energy Footprint, 30 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 241 (2011) (citing Debbie Swanstrom & Meredith M. Jolivert, DOE Transmission Corridor Designations and FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities?, 30 Energy L.J. 415 (2009)).
  • Uma Outka, Siting Renewable Energy: Land Use And Regulatory Context, 37 Ecology L.Q. 1041(2010) (citing Colloquy, EBA Climate Change Primer: Financing a Renewable Project, 29 Energy L.J. 195 (2008)).
  • Dave Owen, Probabilities, Planning Failures, and Environmental Law, 84 Tul. L. Rev. 265 (2009) (citing Roland M. Frye, Jr., The Current “Nuclear Renaissance” in the United States, Its Underlying Reasons, and Its Potential Pitfalls, 29 Energy L.J. 279 (2008)).
  • Carlos Padros & Endrius E. Cocciolo, Security of Energy Supply: When Could National Policy Take Precedence over European Law?, 31 Energy L.J. 31 (2010) (citing Pekka Voutilainen, Developing Energy Policy for Europe: A Finnish Perspective on Energy Cooperation in the European Union, 29 Energy L.J. 121 (2008); Lee Hancher, A Single European Energy Market: Rhetoric or Reality?, 11 Energy L.J. 217 (1990)).
  • Christopher E. Paine, The Nuclear Fuel Cycle, Global Security, and Climate Change: Weighing the Costs and Benefits of Nuclear Power Expansion, 44 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1047 (2010) (citing Roland M. Frye, Jr., The Current “Nuclear Renaissance” in the United States, Its Underlying Reasons, and Its Potential Pitfalls, 29 Energy L.J. 279 (2008); Peter Navarro, Financing U.S. Energy Development: An Economist’s Perspective, 2 Energy L.J. 9 (1981)).
  • Constantine G. Papavizas & Gerald A. Morrissey III, Does the Jones Act Apply to Offshore Alternative Energy Projects?, 34 Tul. Mar. L.J. 377 (2010) (citing Carolyn Elefant, Ocean Energy Development in the 1990s, 14 Energy L.J. 335 (1993)).
  • Larry B. Parker, Robert D. Poling & John L. Moore, Symposium, Clean Air Act Allowance Trading, 21 Envtl. L. 2021 (1991) (citing Vince & Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation in a Post-Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989)).
  • Nutan B. Patel, Is FERC Still in the Picture?: The Primary Function Test as an Obstacle to FERC Regulation, 61 Admin. L. Rev. 441 (2009) (citing Sean Hennessee, Note, Williams Gas Processing-Gulf Coast Company, L.P. v. FERC: Remedies for Producers in the Absence of FERC Regulation, 26 Energy L.J. 497 (2005); John Burrit McArthur, Anti-trust in the New [De]Regulated Natural Gas Industry, 18 Energy L.J. 1 (1997)).
  • Elisabeth Pendley, Deregulation Of The Energy Industry, 31 Land & Water L. Rev. 27 (1996) (citing Richard J. Pierce, The State Of The Transition To Competitive Markets In Natural Gas And Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994);  Clifford S. Sikora, Open Access And Transition Costs: Will The Electric Industry Transition Track The Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15 Energy L.J. 273 (1994); Richard J. Pierce, The State Of The Transition To Competitive Markets In Natural Gas And Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994)).
  • Susan Perera, Following Minnesota's Renewable Energy Example: Will Federal Legislation Fly High or Flap in the Wind?, 9 Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 949 (2008) (citing Mary Ann Ralls, Congress Got It Right: There's No Need to Mandate Renewable Portfolio Standards, 27 Energy L.J. 451 (2006)).
  • Joseph M. Perillo, Neutral Standardizing of Contracts , 28 Pace L. Rev. 179, 194 (2008) (citing Karen Goepfert, For the Long Haul: The Suitability of the Base Contract for the Sale and Purchase of Natural Gas for Long-Term Transactions, 27 Energy L.J. 583 (2006)).
  • Periodicals , 11 Fall Nat. Resources & Env’t 61 (1996) (reviewing R.J. Pierce Jr., Antitrust Policy in the New Electricity Industry, 17 Energy L.J. 29 (1996)).
  • Periodicals , 11 Summer Nat. Resources & Env’t 64 (1996) (reviewing M.A. Swiger, A.P. Southwick, & S.L. Mairs, Paying for the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing?, 17 Energy L.J. 163 (1996)).
  • Rudy Perkins, Note, Electricity Deregulation, Environmental Externalities And The Limitations Of Price, 39 B.C. L. Rev. 903 (1998) (citing Mark E. Hacdicke, Competitive-based Contracts for the New Power Business, 17 Energy L.J. 103 (1996); Peter  Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995); Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995)).
  • Miranda K. Peterson, Tenth Circuit Survey Oil & Gas Law, 75 Denv. U. L. Rev. 1031 (1998) (citing Stacy L. Leeds, Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Company: Judicial Construction of Coalbed Methane Gas Ownership, 17 Energy L.J. 489, 490 (1996); Donald F. Santa & Patricia J. Beneke, Federal Natural Gas Policy and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, 14 Energy L.J. 1 (1993)).  
  • Jeffrey M. Petrash, Long-Term Natural Gas Contracts: Dead, Dying, or Merely Resting?, 27 Energy L.J. 545, 565 (2006) (citing William J. Baumol and J. Gregory Sidak, The Pig in the Python: Is Lumpy Capacity Investment Used and Useful, 23 Energy L.J. 383 (2002)).
  • Jeffrey M. Petrash, Long-Term Natural Gas Contracts: Dead, Dying, or Merely Resting?, 27 Energy L.J. 545, 582 (2006) (citing Report of the Natural Gas Committee, 25 Energy L.J. 217 (2004)).
  • David G. Pettinari, Comment, You Can't Always Get What You Want--Will Two Recent State Court Decisions Tarnish The Political Promise Of Electricity Industry Deregulation?, 76 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 501  (1999) (citing Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995); Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995);     Clinton A. Vince & John S. Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation In A Post-Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989)).
  • Rachel Warnick Petty, A Light in the Darkness: The Case for Judicial Antitrust Enforcement in the Electric Wholesale Industry, 5 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L. 55 (2010) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets to Set Electric Rates?, 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003)).
  • Todd Edward Pettys, Making The Government Pay:  The Application Of The Equal Access To Justice Act In Eeoc V. Clay Printing Company, 72 N.C. L. Rev. 1575 (1994) (citing Steele, Note, Liability for Attorneys' Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act --Raton Gas Transmission Co. v. FERC, 11 Energy L.J. 297 (1990)).
  • David E. Pierce, An Analytical Approach To Drafting Assignments,  44 Sw. L.J. 943 (1990) (citing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).  
  • Jason Pierce, A South American Energy Treaty: How the Region Might Attract Foreign Investment in a Wake of Resource Nationalism, 44 Cornell Int'l L.J. 417 (2011) (citing Jay G. Martin, Venezuela as an Opportunity for Investment in the Petroleum Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 325 (1999)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The Past, Present, and Future of Energy Regulation, 31 Utah Envtl. L. Rev. 291 (2011) (citing John T. Miller, Jr., Conscripting State Regulatory Authorities in a Federal Electric Rate Regulatory Scheme: A Goal of PURPA Partially Realized, 4 Energy L.J. 77 (1983); Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry From Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The Inherent Limits On Judicial Control Of Agency Discretion: The D.C. Circuit And The Nondelegation Doctrine, 52 Admin. L. Rev. 63 (2000 (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J., 11 (1988)).
  • Richard J. Pierce Jr., Small Is Not Beautiful: The Case Against Special Regulatory Treatment Of Small Firms,  50 Admin. L. Rev. 537 (1998) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Antitrust Policy in the New Electricity Industry, 17 Energy L.J. 29 (1996)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Judicial Review Of Agency Actions In A Period Of Diminishing Agency Resources, 49 Admin. L. Rev. 61 (1997) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323  (1994); Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from  Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Rulemaking And The Administrative Procedure Act, 32 Tulsa L.J. 185 (1996) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994); Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The Due Process Counterrevolution Of The 1990s?,   96 Colum. L. Rev. 1973 (1996) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The Evolution Of Natural Gas Regulatory Policy, 10-SUM Nat. Resources & Env't 53 (1995) (citing Richard J. Pierce, The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323  (1994)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Intrastate Natural Gas Regulation: An Alternative Perspective, 9 Yale J. on Reg. 407 (1992) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The Unintended Effects Of Judicial Review Of Agency Rules: How Federal Courts Have Contributed To The Electricity Crisis Of The 1990s, 43 Admin. L. Rev. 7 (1991) (citing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).  
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Public Utility Regulatory Takings:  Should The Judiciary Attempt To Police The Political Institutions?, 77 Geo. L.J. 2031 (1989) (citing Hoecker, 'Used and Useful':  Autopsy of a Ratemaking Policy, 8 Energy L.J. 303 (1987);  Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Two Problems In Administrative Law:  Political Polarity On The District Of Columbia Circuit And Judicial Deterrence Of Agency Rulemaking, 1988 Duke L.J. 300 (1988) (citing Hoecker, 'Used and Useful': Autopsy of a Ratemaking Policy, 8 Energy L.J. 303 (1987)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., State Regulation Of Natural Gas In A Federally Deregulated Market: The Tragedy Of The Commons Revisited, 73 Cornell L. Rev. 15 (1987) (citing Griggs, Restructuring The Natural Gas Industry:  Order No. 436 and Other Regulatory Initiatives, 7 Energy L.J. 71 (1986)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., A Proposal To Deregulate The Market For Bulk Power, 72 Va. L. Rev. 1183 (1986) (citing Pace & Landon,  Introducing Competition into the Electric Utility Industry: An Economic Appraisal, 3 Energy L.J. 1 (1982); Hobelman, The Narragansett Decision and Its Aftermath, 6 Energy L.J. 33 (1985); Miller, Conscripting State Regulatory Authorities in a Federal Electric Rate Regulatory Scheme: A Goal of PURPA Partially Realized, 4 Energy L.J. 77 (1983)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The Role Of Constitutional And Political Theory In Administrative Law, 64 Tex. L. Rev. 469 (1985) (citing Williams, The Proposed Sea-Change in Natural Gas Regulation, 6 Energy L.J. 233 (1985); O'Donnell & Glassman, After the  EPA: What Oil Allocation and Pricing Authorities Remain?, 2 Energy L.J. 33 (1981)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Regulation, Deregulation, Federalism, And Administrative Law: Agency Power To Preempt State Regulation, 46 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 607 (1985) (citing Flax, Has the  Supreme Court Pulled the Rug from Under the FERC's Electric and Natural Gas Regulation?, 4 Energy L.J. 251 (1983); Anderson, The Role of States in Energy Regulation, 4 Energy L.J. 255 (1983); O'Donnell & Glassman, After the EPAA: What Oil Allocation and Pricing Authorities Remain?, 2 Energy L.J. 33 (1981); O'Donnell & Glassman, Constitutional Constructions on State Efforts to Control Oil Supplies and Prices, 5 Energy L.J. 77 (1984)).
  • Richard J. Pierce, Jr. , Completing the Process of Restructuring the Electricity Market, 40 Wake Forest L. Rev. 451, 495+ (2005) (citing William H. Hieronymus, J. Stephen Henderson, and Carolyn A. Berry, Market Power Analysis of the Electricity Generation Sector, 23 Energy L.J. 1 (2002)).
  • Jamie Gibbs Pleune, Do We CAIR About Cooperative Federalism in the Clean Air Act? , 2006 Utah L. Rev. 537, 572 (2006) (citing U.S. Sen. James M. Inhofe and Frank Fannon, Energy and the Environment: The Future of Natural Gas in America, 26 Energy L.J. 349 (2005)).
  • John A. Poakeart, Note and Comment, Watt's Going On?: Illuminating New York's Electric Generation Siting Process, 19 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 135 (2001)   (citing Roger Ridlehoover, The Role of Entry in Deregulating Gas and Electricity, 19 Energy L.J. 307 (1998); Robert L. Bradley, Jr., The Origins of Political Electricity: Market failure or Political Opportunism?, 17 Energy L.J. 59 (1996);    Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347, 351 (1995)).
  • Lucille M. Ponte, Mad Men Posing As Ordinary Consumers: The Essential Role of Self-Regulation and Industry Ethics on Decreasing Deceptive Online Consumer Ratings and Reviews, 12 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 462 (2013) (citing Carolyn Elefant, The “Power” of Social Media: Legal Issues and Best Practices for Utilities Engaging Social Media, 32 Energy L.J. 1 (2011)).
  • Melissa Powers, Small Is (Still) Beautiful: Designing U.S. Energy Policies to Increase Localized Renewable Energy Generation, 30 Wis. Int'l L.J. 595 (2012) (citing Peter Navarro & Michael Shames, Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned from California, 24 Energy L. J. 33 (2003); Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995)).
  • Practising Law Institute PLI Order No. B0-01JN  November, 2002    Utility Restructuring 2002: Negotiating, Structuring & Documenting the Deal   Drawing Back The Regulatory Curtain: Antitrust Issues And Hypothetical Problems    Ray S. Bolze  part of Public Utility Law (1992-2002). He co-authored Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000). He participated in a mock courtroom trial at the August 1998 ABA Annual Meeting in Toronto entitled, "Antitrust ...” (Jan. 10, 1996).   See Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113, 113-14, 119-21 (1997). See also Legislative and Oversight Hearing on Antitrust Aspects of Electricity Deregulation Before the House Comm.; John C. Peirce & Linda L. Walsh, Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus For a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000).  
  • Arjun Prasad, Forward-Looking Improvements to Licensing the Next Generation of Nuclear Reactors, 2 Am. U. Bus. L. Rev. 209 (2012) (citing Roland M. Frye, Jr., The Current ‘Nuclear Renaissance’ in the United States, Its Underlying Reasons, and Its Potential Pitfalls, 29 Energy L.J.279, 338 (2008)).
  • Robert A. Prentice, and David B. Spence, Sarbanes-Oxley As Quack Corporate Governance: How Wise Is The Received Wisdom?, 95 Geo. L.J. 1843, 1909+ (2007) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy and William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise And Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Robert Prentice, The Inevitability of a Strong SEC, 91 Cornell L. Rev. 775, 839 (2006) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy and William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise And Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Meredith M. Price, The Proper Application of Daubert to Expert Testimony in Class Certification, 16 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 1349 (2012) (citing Brooks E. Harlow & Roy W. Spencer, An Inconvenient Burden of Proof? CO2 Nuisance Plaintiffs Will Face Challenges in Meeting the Daubert Standard, 32 Energy L.J. 459 (2011)).
  • George W. Pring & Brian S.W. Tobias, International Environmental Law And World Order, 23 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 599 (1995) (book review) (citing William A. Mogel, Book Review: International Environmental Law and World Order, 16 Energy L.J.
  • A.C. Pritchard & Robert B. Thompson, Securities Law and the New Deal Justices, 95 Va. L. Rev. 841 (2009) (citing Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise And Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Garrick B. Pursley & Hannah J. Wiseman, Local Energy, 60 Emory L.J. 877 (2011) (citing Susan Kelly & Elise Caplan, Time for a Day 1.5 Market: A Proposal to Reform RTO-Run Centralized Wholesale Electricity Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 491 (2008)).
  • Michael T. Pyle, Note, Beyond Fish Ladders:  Dam Removal As A Strategy For Restoring America's River, 14 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 97 (1995) (citing John D. Echeverria, The Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986, 8 Energy L.J. 61 (1987)).
  • Xin Qiu, Honglin Li, Energy Regulation and Legislation in China, 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10678 (2012) (citing Mark Newton Lowry & Lawrence Kaufmann, Performance-Based Regulation of Utilities, 23 Energy L.J. 399 (2002)).
  • Elias L. Quinn & Adam L. Reed, Envisioning The Smart Grid: Network Architecture, Information Control, and the Public Policy Balancing Act, 81 U. Colo. L. Rev. 833 (2010) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008)).
  • Bruce W. Radford, Two Hands Clapping, 148 NO. 4 Pub. Util. Fort. 17 (2010) (citing J. Wellinghoff and D. Morenoff, Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation, 28 Energy L.J. 389 (2007)).
  • R.S. Radford, J. David Breemer,  The Significance And Proper Role Of Investment-Backed Expectations In Regulatory Takings Law , American Law Institute - American Bar Association Continuing Legal Education  May 3, 2001  -  Inverse Condemnation and Related Government Liability Law and Regulation, SE88 (May-June, 2000). (citing Paul Turner & Sam Kalen, Takings and Beyond: Implications for Regulation, 19 Energy L.J. 25 (1998)).
  • R. S. Radford & J. David Breemer, Great Expectations: Will Palazzolo V. Rhode Island Clarify The Murky Doctrine Of Investment-Backed Expectations In Regulatory Takings Law?, 9 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 449 (2001) (citing Paul Turner & Sam Kalen, Takings and Beyond: Implications for Regulation, 19 Energy L.J. 25 (1998)).
  • Adam Gardner Rankin, Geologic Sequestration of CO2: How EPA’s Proposal Falls Short, 49 Nat. Resources J. 883 (2009) (citing Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008); Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L.J. 443 (2007)).
  • Elizabeth A. Ransom, Wind Power Development on the United States Outer Continental Shelf: Balancing Efficient Development and Environmental Risks in the Shadow of the OCSLA, 31 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 465 (2004) (citing Carolyn Elefant, Ocean Energy Development in the 1990s, 14 Energy L.J. 335 (1993)).
  • Geoffrey Rapp, Beyond Protection: Invigorating Incentives for Sarbanes-Oxley Corporate and Securities Fraud Whistleblowers , 87 B.U. L. Rev. 91, 156 (2007) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy and William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise And Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Lee A. Rau, Symposium, Open Access In The Power Industry: Competition, Cooperation, And Policy Dilemmas, 64 Antitrust L.J. 279 (1996) (citing Floyd L. Norton IV & Mark R. Spivak, The Wholesale Service Obligation of Electric Utilities, 6 Energy L.J. 179 (1985); Joe D. Pace & John H. Landon, Introducing Competition into the Electric Utility Industry: An ...,, also Joe D. Pace & John H. Landon, Introducing Competition into the Electric Utility Industry: An Economic Appraisal, 3 Energy L.J. 1 (1982)).
  • Brendan J. Reed, Private Equity Partial Acquisitions: Towards a New Antitrust Paradigm, 5 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 303 (2010) (citing Raymond S. Hartman, The Efficiency Effects of Electric Utility Mergers: Lessons from Statistical Cost Analysis, 17 Energy. L.J. 425 (1996)).
  • LaVonda N. Reed-Huff, Dirty Dishes, Dirty Laundry, and Windy Mills: A Framework for Regulation of Clean Energy Devices, 40 Envtl. L. 859 (2010) (citing Matthew Holden, Jr., Energy Policy and the Obama Administration: Some Choices and Challenges, 30 Energy L.J. 405 (2009)).
  • Hadassah M. Reimer & Sandra A. Snodgrass, Tortoises, Bats, and Birds, Oh My: Protected-Species Implications for Renewable Energy Projects, 46 Idaho L. Rev. 545 (2010) (citing John Arnold McKinsey, Regulating Avian Impacts Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Other Laws: The Wind Industry Collides With One of Its Own, the Environmental Protection Movement, 28 Energy L.J. 71 (2007)).
  • William T. Reisinger, Federal and State Renewable Portfolio Standards: Conflict or Harmony?, 41 U. Tol. L. Rev. 877 (2010) (citing Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2008)).
  • William T. Reisinger et al., Reconciling King Coal and Climate Change: A Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 11 Vt. J. Envtl L. 1 (2009) (citing Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008)).
  • Arnold W. Reitze, Jr., Electric Power in a Carbon Constrained World, 34 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 821 (2010) (citing EBA Climate Change Primer: Financing a Renewable Project, 29 Energy L.J. 195 (2008)).
  • Stacy Rentner, Note, Venezuela: How a Hydrocarbons Law Crippled an Oil Giant, 27 H astings I nt’l & C omp. L. R ev. 351 (2004) (citing Jay G. Martin, Venezuela as an Opportunity for Investment in the Petroleum Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 325, 328 (1999)).
  • Robert Ressetar, The Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository From a Federalism Perspective, 23 J. L and R esources & Envtl. L. 219 (2003) (citing Scott R. Helton, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179, 185 (2002)).
  • Robert Ressetar, The Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository From A Federalism Perspective, 23 J. Land Resources & Envtl. L. 219, (2003) (citing Scott R. Helton, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179 (2002)).
  • Robert Ressetar, The Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository from a Federalism Perspective, 23 J. Land Resources & Envtl. L. 219, 240 (2003) (citing Scott R. Helton, Comment, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179 (2002)).
  • Restructuring of the Electric Industry 2008 Annual Report, 2008 ABA Env't, Energy, & Res. L.: Year in Rev. 296 (2008) (citing Susan Kelly & Elise Caplan, Time for a Day 1.5 Market: A Proposal to Reform RTO-Run Centralized Wholesale Electricity Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 491 (2008)).
  • Gregory J. Rigano, The Solution to the United States' Energy Troubles Is Blowing in the Wind, 39 Hofstra L. Rev. 201 (2011) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007); Jacob Dweck, David Wochner & Michael Brooks, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006)).
  • Christopher Riti, Three Sheets to the Wind: The Renewable Energy Production Tax Credit, Congressional Political Posturing, and an Unsustainable Energy Policy, 27 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 783 (2010) (citing Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L. J. 79 (2008); Mary Ann Ralls, Congress Got It Right: There's No Need to Mandate Renewable Portfolio Standards, 27 Energy L.J. 451 (2006)).
  • Stuart M. Reynolds, Jr., The Relationship Of Antitrust Laws To Regulated Industries And Intellectual Property In The New Marketplace, 4 Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 1  (2002) (citing Ray S. Bolze et al., Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000)).
  • John E. Rhea, Privatization In the International Petroleum Industry: The Interplay Between Politics, Economics, and Reliance, 33 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 609, 639+ (2005) (citing Alastair R. Lucas, Canada’s Role in United States Oil and Gas Supply and Security: Oil Sands, Arctic Gas, NAFTA and Canadian Kyoto Protocol Impacts , 25 Energy L.J. 403 (2004)).
  • Alan I. Robbins  Stacy D. Gould, Symposium, Traditional Municipalization And Duplication Of Facilities Cases: Backround, Facts, And Status 37 Nat. Resources J. 155 (1997) (citing Robert L. Bradley, Jr., The Origins of Political Electricity: Market Failure or Political Opportunism?, 17 Energy L.J. 59 (1996), (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J., 323 (1994)).
  • Cassandra Burke Robertson, Bringing The Camel Into The Tent: State And Federal Power Over Electricity Transmission, 49 Clev. St. L. Rev. 71 (2001) (citing William H. Penniman & Paul B. Turner, A Jurisdictional Clash Over Electricity Transmission: Northern States Power v. FERC, 20 Energy L.J. 205, 216 (1999)).
  • Sam Robinson, So Much up in the Air: The Carbon Dioxide Debate and Coal Plant Permitting in Virginia, 35 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 269 (2010) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008)).
  • Joshua Z. Rokach, 16-WTR Nat. Resources & Env't 183 (2002), The Invisible Hand Will Secure The Electric Grid  (citing Hon. Curt L. Hébert, Jr., Q uest for an Inventive Utility Regulatory Agenda, 19 ENERGY L.J.. 1 (1998)).
  • Joshua Z. Rokach, Structuring Against The Backdrop Of Deregulation: The Federal Power Act, Practicing Law Institute  PLI Order No. B0-00BX  October, 1999  (citing C.L. Hébert, Jr., The Quest for an Inventive Utility Agenda, 19 Energy L.J. 1, 13-19 (1998)).
  • Joshua Z. Rokach, Structuring Against The Backdrop Of Deregulation: The Federal Power Act, Practicing Law Institute  PLI Order No. B0-003B, October, 1998  (citing Curt L. Hébert, Jr. The Quest for an Inventive Utility Agenda, 19 Energy L.J. 1 (1998)).
  • Joshua Z. Rokach, Antitrust In The Electric Utility Industry: Regional Transmission Groups, 14 J.L. & Com. 39 (1994) (citing Thomas K. Gump, Antitrust Aspects of The ITCF's New Parallel Flow Discussions, 15 Energy L.J. 123 (1994); Joshua Z. Rokach, Transmission Pricing Under The Federal Power Act: Applying a Market Screen , 14 Energy L.J. 95 (1993)).
  • David L. Roland, Comment, Take-Or-Pay Provisions: Major Problems For The Natural Gas Industry, 18 St. Mary's L.J. 251 (1986) (citing Adair & Bloom, Flexible Pricing and Other Partial Solutions to the Problems Faced by Gas Distributors, 4 Energy L.J. 239 (1983); Adair & Bloom, Flexible Pricing and Other Partial Solutions to the Problems Faced by Gas Distributors, 4 Energy L.J. 239 (1983) ; Williams, The Proposed Sea-Change in Natural Gas Regulation, 6 ENERGY L.J. 233 (1985)).
  • Claire R. Rollor, Logic, Not Evidence, Supports A Change in Expert Testimony Standards: Why Evidentiary Standards Promulgated by the Supreme Court for Scientific Expert Testimony Are Inappropriate and Inefficient When Applied in Patent in, 8 J. Bus. & Tech. L. 313 (2013) (citing Citing: Brooks E. Harlow & Roy W. Spencer, An Inconvenient Burden of Proof? CO2 Nuisance Plaintiffs Will Face Challenges in Meeting the Daubert Standard, 32 Energy L.J. 459 (2011)).
  • Allison Rose, Mending the Fracture: Bringing Parties Together on High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing Through Alternative Dispute Resolution, 5 Ky. J. Equine, Agric. & Nat. Resources L. 33 (2013) (citing James M. Inhofe & Frank Fannon, Energy and the Environment: The Future of Natural Gas in America, 26 Energy L.J. 349 (2005)).
  • Susan Rose-Ackerman & Jim Rossi, Disentangling Deregulatory Takings, 86 Va. L. Rev. 1435 (2000) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and "Takings," 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989)).  
  • Issachar Rosen-Zvi, You Are Too Soft!: What Can Corporate Social Responsibility Do for Climate Change?, 12 Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 527 (2011) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • Jim Rossi, Antitrust Process and Vertical Deference: Judicial Review of State Regulatory Inaction, 93 Iowa L. Rev. 185 (2007) (citing Donald F. Santa, Jr., Who Needs What, and Why? Reporting and Disclosure Requirements in Emerging Competitive Electricity Markets, 21 Energy L.J. 1 (2000); Ray S. Bolze et al., Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000)).
  • Jim Rossi, John Burrit McArthur, Anti-Trust in the New [De]Regulated Natural Gas Industry, 18 Energy L.J. 1 (1997), 40 Wake Forest L. Rev. 617 (2005) (citing John Burrit McArthur, Anti-Trust in the New [De]Regulated Natural Gas Industry, 18 Energy L.J. 1 (1997)).
  • Jim Rossi, Lowering the Filed Tariff Shield: Judicial Enforcement for a Deregulatory Era, 56 Vand. L. Rev. 1591 (2003) (citing Donald F. Santa, Jr., Who Needs What, and Why? Reporting and Disclosure Obligations in Emerging Competitive Electricity Markets, 21 Energy L.J. 1 (2000)).
  • Jim Rossi, Political Bargaining and Judicial Intervention in Constitutional and Antitrust Federalism, 83 Wash. U. L.Q. 521 (2005) (citing John Burrit McArthur, Anti-trust in the New [De]Regulated Natural Gas Industry, 18 Energy L.J. 1 (1997)).
  • Jim Rossi, The Limits of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard, 42 Conn. L. Rev. 1425 (2010) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79, 81 (2008)).
  • Jim Rossi, The Political Economy of Energy and Its Implications for Climate Change Legislation, 84 Tul. L. Rev. 379 (2009) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and “Takings”, 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989)).
  • Jim Rossi, The Shaky Political Economy Foundation of a National Renewable Electricity Requirement, 2011 U. Ill. L. Rev. 361 (2011) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Robert J. Michaels, National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Smart Policy or Misguided Gesture?, 29 Energy L.J. 79 (2008)).
  • Jim Rossi, The Trojan Horse of Electric Power Transmission Line Siting Authority, 39 Envtl. L. 1015 (2009) (citing Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Susan Kelly & Elise Caplan, Time for a Day 1.5 Market: A Proposal to Reform RTO-Run Centralized Wholesale Electricity Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 491 (2008)).
  • Jim Rossi, The Electric Deregulation Fiasco: Looking To Regulatory Federalism To Promote A Balance Between Markets And The Provision Of Public Goods, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 1768 (2002) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the "Perfect Storm," 22 Energy L.J. 65, 71 (2001); Nicholas W. Fels & Frank R. Lindh, Lessons from the California "Apocalypse:" Jurisdiction Over Electric Utilities, 22 Energy L.J. 1 (2001)).
  • Jim Rossi, The Irony Of Deregulatory Takings Deregulatory Takings And The Regulatory Contract: The Competitive Transformation Of Network Industries In The United States, 77 Tex. L. Rev. 297 (1998) (book review) (citing Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995); Walter R. Hall II, Securitization and Stranded Cost Recovery, 18 Energy L.J. 363  (1997); Michael A. Swiger et al., Paying for the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing?, 17 Energy L.J. 163 (1996)).
  • Jim Rossi, Clean Energy and the Price Preemption Ceiling, 3 San Diego J. Climate & Energy L. 243 (2012) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995); Hon. Jon Wellinghoff & David L. Morenoff, Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation, 28 Energy L.J. 389 (2007)).
  • Jim Rossi, The Common Law "Duty To Serve" And Protection Of Consumers In An Age Of Competitive Retail Public Utility Restructuring, 51 Vand. L. Rev. 1233 (1998) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994);  Wholesale Customer Loads in a Competitive Environment: The Obligation to Provide Wholesale Service Under the Federal Power Act, 8 Energy L.J. 237 (1987); Floyd Norton & Mark Spivak, The Wholesale Service Obligation of Electric Utilities, 6 Energy L.J. 179 (1985)).
  • Jim Rossi, Making Policy Through The Waiver Of Regulations At The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 47 Admin. L. Rev. 255 (1995) (citing P. Noland & William H. Penniman, The FERC Adjustments Process Under Section 502(c) of the Natural Gas Policy Act, 1 Energy L.J. 79 (1980); Kiplyn R. Farmer, Note, FERC Waiver of the Filed Rate Doctrine: Some Suggested Principles, 9 Energy L.J. 497 (1988)).  
  • Jim Rossi, Lessons From The Procedural Politics Of The "Comprehensive" National Energy Policy Act Of 1992, 19 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 195 (1995) (citing Chandler L. Van Orman, The National Energy Strategy--An Illusive Quest for Energy Security, 13 Energy L.J. 251 (1992)).
  • Jim Rossi & Thomas Hutton, Judge Cudahy and the Deference Tension in United States Energy Law, 29 Yale J. on Reg. 371 (2012) (citing  Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 25 Energy L.J. 161 (2004); Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995); Michael H. Dworkin & Rachel Aslin Goldwasser, Ensuring Consideration of the Public Interest in the Governance and Accountability of Regional Transmission Organizations, 28 Energy L.J. 543 (2007); Energy Bar Ass'n, Report of the Electric Utility Regulation Committee, 26 Energy L.J. 217 (2005)).
  • Jim Rossi, Redeeming Judicial Review: The Hard Look Doctrine And Federal Regulatory Efforts To Restructure The Electric Utility Industry, 1994 Wis. L. Rev. 763 (1994) (citing Donald F. Santa, Jr. & Patricia J. Beneke, Federal  Natural Gas Policy and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, 14 Energy L.J. 1 (1993)).
  • Jim Rossi, Lowering the Filed Tariff Shield: Judicial Enforcement for a Deregulatory Era, 56 Vand. L. Rev. 1591, 1659 (2003) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets To Set Electric Rates? 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003)).
  • Jim Rossi, Transmission Siting in Deregulated Wholesale Power Markets: Re-Imagining the Role of Courts In Resolving Federal-State Siting Impasses, 15 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol'y F. 315, 339 (2005) (citing Donald F. Santa, Jr. and Clifford S. Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 25 Energy L.J. 113 (2004)).
  • Jim Rossi & Thomas Hutton, Federal Preemption and Clean Energy Floors, 91 N.C. L. Rev. 1283 (2013) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994); Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 25 Energy L.J. 57 (2004); Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995); Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005); Clinton A. Vince & Nancy A. Wodka, Recent Legal Developments and Legislative Trends in Federal Preference Power Marketing, 7 Energy L.J. 1 (1986); Joshua P. Fershee, Changing Resources, Changing Market: The Impact of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard on the U.S. Energy Industry, 29 Energy L.J. 49 (2008); Jon Wellinghoff & David L. Morenoff, Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation, 28 Energy L.J. 389, 393-96 (2007)).
  • Edan Rotenberg, Energy Efficiency in Regulated and Deregulated Markets, 24 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol'y 259 (2006) (citing John S. Moot, Economic Theories of Regulation and Electricity Restructuring, 25 Energy L.J. 273 (2004)).
  • Mark A. Rowland, Energy, 56 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 761 (1988) (citing Griggs, Restructuring the Natural Gas Industry:  Order No. 436 and Other Regulatory Initiatives, 7 Energy L.J. 71 (1986)).
  • John L. Rudy, Limitation of Liability Clauses in Public Utility Tariffs: Is the Rationale for State-Sponsored Indemnity Still Valid?, 52 Buff. L. Rev. 1379, 1398 (2004) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr.,Regional Transmission Organizations: Federal Limitations Needed for Tort Liability, 23 Energy L.J. 63 (2002)).
  • J.B. Ruhl, Climate Change Adaptation and the Structural Transformation of Environmental Law, 40 Envtl. L. 363 (2010) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • J.B. Ruhl & James Salzman, Climate Change, Dead Zones, and Massive Problems in the Administrative State: A Guide for Whittling Away, 98 Cal. L. Rev. 59 (2010) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema M. Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • J.B. Ruhl & James Salzman, Climate Change Meets the Law of the Horse, 62 Duke L.J. 975 (2013) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • J.B. Ruhl, Harmonizing Commercial Wind Power and the Endangered Species Act Through Administrative Reform, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1769 (2012) (citing Donald F. Santa, Jr. & Patricia J. Beneke, Federal Natural Gas Policy and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, 14 Energy L.J. 1 (1993)).
  • Troy A. Rule, Renewable Energy and the Neighbors, 2010 Utah L. Rev. 1223 (2010) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • J. Keith Russell, Comment, The Time Is Now For Full Privatization Of Peme, 20 Hous. J. Int'l L. 173 (1997) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • 33 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 367, 425 (2007), Thirty-Ninth Selected Bibliography on Computers, Technology, and the Law, (citing Peter M. Crofton, Emerging Issues Relating to the Burgeoning Hydrogen Economy, 27 Energy L.J. 39 (2006)).
  • 33 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 367, 425 (2007), Thirty-Ninth Selected Bibliography on Computers, Technology, and the Law , (citing Prof. Dr. Thomas von Danwitz, Regulation and Liberalization of the European Electricity Market- A German View, 27 Energy L.J. 423 (2006)).
  • 38 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 277, Forty-Third Selected Bibliography on Computers, Technology and the Law, (2012) (citing Carolyn Elefant, The “Power” of Social Media: Legal Issues & Best Practices For Utilities Engaging Social Media, 32 Energy L.J. 1 (2011)).
  • Allen L. Rutz, Comment, After The Meter: Energy Products Liability In A Deregulated Environment,  26 Cap. U. L. Rev. 421 (1997) (citing M. Bogardus, From "Command and Control" to Risk Management: The Evolution of the Federal Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Program, 16 Energy L.J. 461 (1995); Robert J. Michaels, Market Power in Electric Utility Mergers: Access, Energy, and the Guidelines, 17 Energy L.J. 401 (1996)).
  • Noah M. Sachs, Greening Demand: Energy Consumption and U.S. Climate Policy, 19 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol'y F. 295 (2009) (citing Darrell Blakeway & Carol Brotman White, Tapping the Power of Wind: FERC Initiatives to Facilitate Transmission of Wind Power, 26 Energy L.J. 393 (2005)).
  • Santosh Sagar, A Twenty-First Century Lazarus? The Demise and Possible Rebirth Of FERC Backstop Siting Authority, 37 Ecology L.Q. 693 (2010) (citing Meredith M. Jolivert, DOE Transmission Corridor Designations and FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities?, 30 Energy L.J. 415 (2009)).
  • Mayuca Salazar, The North American Gas Markets and the Role of Regulatory Agencies (NEB/Canada, FERC/USA, and CRE/Mexico), 2 Tex. J. Oil, Gas & Energy L. 167 (2007) (citing James M. Fannon & Frank Fannon, Energy and the Environment: The Future of Natural Gas in America, 26 Energy L.J. 349 (2005); Richard J. Pierce, The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994)).
  • Rachael Salcido, Siting Offshore Hydrokinetic Energy Projects: A Comparative Look at Wave Energy Regulation in the Pacific Northwest, 5 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 109 (2011) (citing Jon Wellington, James Pederson & David L. Morenoff, Facilitating Hydrokinetic Energy Development Through Regulatory Innovation, 29 Energy L. J. 397 (2008)).
  • Patricia E. Salkin, Anderson's American Law of Zoning § 37:9, Renewable Energy-Wind Power (2011) (citing Brit T. Brown and Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • Patricia E. Salkin & Ashira Pelman Ostrow, Cooperative Federalism and Wind: A New Framework for Achieving Sustainability, 37 Hofstra L. Rev. 1049 (2009) (citing Jacob Dweck, David Wochner & Michael Brooks, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006)).
  • Adam D. Samuels, Reliability Of Natural Gas Service For Captive End-Users Under The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Order No. 63662, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 718 (1994) (citing Philip M. Marston, Pipeline Restructuring:  The Future of Open-Access Transportation, 12 Energy L.J. 53 (1991); John W. Griggs, Restructuring the Natural Gas Industry:  Order No. 436 and Other Regulatory Initiatives, 7 Energy L.J. 71 (1986); Robert C. Means & Robert S. Angyal, The Regulation and Future Role of Direct Producer Sales, 5 Energy L.J. 1 (1984)).
  • Adam D. Samuels, Reliability Of Natural Gas Service For Captive End-Users Under The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Order No. 63662, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 718 (1994) (citing Philip M. Marston, Pipeline Restructuring:  The Future of Open-Access Transportation, 12 Energy L.J. 53 (1991); John W. Griggs, Restructuring the Natural Gas Industry:  Order No. 436 and Other Regulatory Initiatives, 7 Energy L.J. 71 (1986); Robert C. Means & Robert S. Angyal, The Regulation and Future Role of Direct Producer Sales, 5 Energy L.J. 1 (1984)).
  • J. Owen Saunders, North American Deregulation Of Electricity: Sharing Regulatory Sovereignty, 36 Tex. Int'l L.J. 167 (2001) (citing Shelly P. Battram & Reinier H. Lock, The Canada/United States Free-Trade Agreement and Trade in Energy, 9 Energy L.J. 327(1988)).
  • John A. Sautter et al., The Energy Trilemma in the Green Mountain State: An Analysis of Vermont's Energy Challenges and Policy Options, 10 Vt. J. Envtl L. 477 (2009) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, The Bell Tolls for Hydrocarbons: What's Next?, 29 Energy L.J. 381 (2008)).
  • Pieter M. Schenkkan, When And How Should Texas Courts Review Agency Rules?, 47 Baylor L. Rev. 989 (1995) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Mary Ellen Schill, Note, Refusals To Deal By Single-Firm Monopolists--Should We Rob Peter To Save Paul?,  63 Notre Dame L. Rev. 214 (1988) (citing Bouknight, Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing--The Conduct Standard Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 6 Energy L.J. 275 (1985)).
  • Everest Schmidt, A Call for Federalism: The Role of State Government in Federally Controlled Energy Markets, 65 Rutgers L. Rev. 573 (2013) (citing Joseph T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, and the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1 (2005)).
  • Edward J. Schnee and W. Eugene Seago, New Developments Prompt a New Look at Section 118 Contributions to Capital, 108 J. Tax’n 24, 23 (2008) (citing Jackie S. Levinson and Andrew D. Schifrin, Regulatory and Tax Treatment of Electric Interconnection Facilities, 23 Energy L.J. 459 (2002)).
  • York Schnorbus, Tracking Stock In Germany: Is German Corporate Law Flexible Enough To Adopt American Financial Innovations?, 22 U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 541  (2001) (citing Ajay Gupta, Tracking Stranded Costs, 21 Energy L.J. 113 (2000)).
  • Joe Schremmer, Avoidable "Fraccident": An Argument Against Strict Liability for Hydraulic Fracturing, 60 U. Kan. L. Rev. 1215 (2012) (citing James M. Inhofe & Frank Fannon, Energy and the Environment: The Future of Natural Gas in America, 26 Energy L.J. 349 (2005)).
  • Jeffery  D. Schwartz, The Use Of The Antitrust State Action Doctrine In The Deregulated Electric Utility Industry, 48 Am. U. L. Rev. 1449, (1999) (citing   Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Antitrust Policy in the New Electric Industry, 17 Energy L.J. 29, 29 (1996); Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995)).
  • Inara K. Scott, Note, A Model For Alaska: Deregulation In The Far North,  16 Alaska L. Rev. 329 (1999) (citing Stephen Angle & George Cannon, Jr., Independent Transmission Companies: The For-Profit Alternative in Competitive Electric Markets, 19 Energy L.J. 229 (1998)).
  • Inara Scott, "Dancing Backward in High Heels": Examining and Addressing the Disparate Regulatory Treatment of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Resources, 43 Envtl. L. 255 (2013) (citing Michael D. Hornstein & J.S. Gebhart Stoermer, The Energy Policy Act of 2005: PURPA Reform, the Amendments, and Their Implications, 27 Energy L.J. 25 (2006)).
  • Christopher M. Seelen, Comment   The Essential Facilities Doctrine: What Does It Mean To Be Essential?, 80 Marq. L. Rev. 1117 (1997) (citing William B. Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).
  • Mark Seidenfeld, A Syncopated Chevron: Emphasizing Reasoned Decisionmaking In Reviewing Agency Interpretations Of Statutes, 73 Tex. L. Rev. 83 (1994) (citing Jerome Nelson, The Chevron Deference Rule and Judicial Review of FERC Orders, 9 Energy L.J. 59 (1988)).
  • Charles R. Sensiba, Comment, Who's In Charge Here?  The Shrinking Role Of The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission In Hydropower Relicensing, 70 U. Colo. L. Rev. 603 (1999) (citing Michael A. Swiger et al., Paying for the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing?, 17 Energy L.J. 163 (1996); Melissa Powell, Note, A Case Study for Stakeholders: An Alternative to Traditional Hydroelectric Relicensing, 18 Energy L.J. 405 (1997)).
  • Thomas Shaffer, The Profession As A Moral Teacher, 18 St. Mary's L.J. 195 (1986) (citing Adair & Bloom, Flexible Pricing and Other Partial Solutions to the Problems Faced by Gas Distributors, 4 Energy L.J. 239 (1983); Williams, The Proposed Sea-Change in Natural Gas Regulation, 6 Energy L.J. 233 (1985)).
  • Sidney A. Shapiro and Joseph P. Tomain, Rethinking Reform of Electricity Markets, 40 Wake Forest L. Rev. 497, 543 (2005) (citing John S. Moot, Economic Theories of Regulation and Electricity Restructuring, 25 Energy L.J. 273 (2004)).
  •  
  • Courtney Shaw, Note, Uncertain Justice: Liability Of Multinationals Under The Alien Tort Claims Act, 54 Stan. L. Rev. 1359 (2002) (citing Eric Marcks, Avoiding Liability for Human Rights Violations in Project Finance, 22 Energy L.J. 301 (2001)).
  • Ora R. Sheinson, Note, Lessons From The Jewish Law Of Property Rights For The Modern American Takings Debate, 26 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 483 (2001) (citing Paul Turner and Sam Kalen, Takings and Beyond: Implications for Regulation, 19 Energy L.J. 25 (1998)).
  • Judy Sheldrew, Note, Shutting The Barn Door Before The Horse Is Stolen: How And Why State Public Utility Commissions Should Regulate Transactions Between A Public Utility And Its Affiliates, 4 Nev. L.J. 164  (2003) (citingPublic Utility Holding Company Act of 1935: The "Old" Federalism and State Regulation of Inter-State Holding Companies, 17 Energy L.J. 343, 343 (1996)).
  • Corey Stephen Shoock, Blowing in the Wind: How a Two-Tiered National Renewable Portfolio Standard, a System Benefits Fund, and Other Programs will Reshape American Energy Investment and Reduce Fossil Fuel Externalities, 12 Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law 1011+ (2007) (citing Hon. Josephy T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, And the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1 (2005)).
  • Corey Stephen Shoock, Blowing in the Wind: How a Two-Tiered National Renewable Portfolio Standard, a System Benefits Fund, and Other Programs will Reshape American Energy Investment and Reduce Fossil Fuel Externalities, 12 Fordham J. of Corp. & Fin. L. 1011 (2007) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy and William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise And Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Corey Stephen Shoock, Blowing in the Wind: How a Two-Tiered National Renewable Portfolio Standard, a System Benefits Fund, and Other Programs will Reshape American Energy Investment and Reduce Fossil Fuel Externalities, 12 Fordham J. of Corp. & Fin. L. 1011 (2007) (citing Michael D. Hornstein and J.S. Gebhart Stoermer, The Energy Policy Act of 2005: PURPA Reform, the Amendments and their Implications, 27 Energy L.J. 25 (2006)).
  • Rebecca C. Shore, Further Deregulation Of The Natural Gas And Oil Industry, 66 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 949 (1998) (citing John Burrit McArthur, Anti-Trust inthe New [De]regulated Natural Gas Industry, 18 Energy L.J. 1 (1997)).
  • John R. Sigety, An Examination of Demand-Side Management in the U.S. Since the Energy Crises of the 1970s, 7 Appalachian Nat. Resources L.J. 1 (2013) (citing Committee Report, Report of the Demand-Side Resources & Smart Grid Committee, 32 Energy L.J. 235 (2011); Committee Report, Report of the Renewable Energy & Demand-Side Management Committee, 31 Energy L.J. 287 (2010)).
  • Clifford S. Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15 Energy L.J. 273 (1994)).
  • Joseph G. Silver, The Global Partnership: The Final Blow to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime?, 21 N.Y. Int’l L. Rev. 69, 93 (2008) (citing Jonathan A. Lesser, The Used and Useful Test: Implications For a Restructured Electric Industry, 23 Energy L.J. 349 (2002)).
  • Elesha Simeonov, Just Not Reasonable: What the Ferc's Order on Demand Response Compensation Reveals About the Current Shortfalls in "Just and Reasonable" Rulemaking, 31 Temp. J. Sci. Tech. & Envtl. L. 311 (2012) (citing Susan Kelly & Elise Caplan, Time for a Day 1.5 Market: A Proposal to Reform RTO-Run Centralized Wholesale Electricity Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 491 (2008)).
  • Joshua B. Simmons, Valuation in Investor-State Arbitration: Toward A More Exact Science, 30 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 196 (2012) (citing Thomas R. Stauffer, Valuation of Assets in International Takings, 17 Energy L.J. 459 (1996))
  • Patrice Lumumba Simms, On Diversity and Public Policymaking: An Environmental Justice Perspective, 13 Sustainable Dev. L. & Pol'y 14 (2013) (citing Mark W. Ciaravella, Comment, Regulation of Hazardous Air Pollutants Under Section 112 of The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 15 Energy L.J. 485 (1994)).
  • Joseph J. Simons, Fixing Price With Your Victim: Efficiency And Collusion With Competitor-Based Formula Pricing Clauses, 17 Hofstra L. Rev. 599 (1989) (citing Hughes, Indefinite Escalators: 1985, Does FERC Have a "Stairway" Down?, 4 Energy L.J. 189 (1983)).
  • Alexander F. Skirpan, Jr., Plus Ca Change, Plus C'est La Meme Chose: 1990 Amendments To Clean Air Act And Their Impact On Utility Regulation, 55 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 171 (1993) (citing Robert R. Nordhaus, Acid Rain Compliance: Coordination of State and Federal Regulation, 13 Energy L.J. 341 (1992); Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and "Takings", 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989)).
  • Thomas Smidt III,  Student Writings   United Water New Mexico, Inc. V. New Mexico Public Utility Commission:   Why Rules Governing The Condemnation And Municipalization Of Water Utilities May Not Apply To Electric Utilities, 38 Nat. Resources J. 667 (1989) (citing Michael J. Doane & Daniel F. Spulber, Municipalization: Opportunism and Bypass in Electric Power, 18 Energy L.J. 333 (1997)).
  • William C. Smith, Save Domestic Oil, Inc.'S Crude Oil Market Dumping Petition: Domestic And International Political Considerations, 8 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 147 (2000) (citing Jay G. Martin, Venezuela as an Opportunity for Investment in the Petroleum Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 325 (1999)).
  • Steven W. Snarr, Deregulation Of Natural Gas Utilities: A Proposal For Legislative Reform In State Utility Regulation, 11 J. Energy Nat. Resources & Envtl. L. 199 (1991) (citing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988); Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)); Hughes & Hall, Substituting Competition for Regulation, 11 Energy L.J. 243 (1990)).
  • Todd A. Snitchler, Maintaining The Status Quo: Electricity Utility Deregulation Difficulties In Ohio,  49 Clev. St. L. Rev. 647 (2001) (citing Walter R. Hall, II, Securitization and Stranded Cost Recovery, 18 ENERGY L.J. 363 (1998); Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Retail Electric Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 ENERGY L.J. 27 (2000); Robert J. Michaels, The Governance of Transmission Operators, 20 ENERGY L.J. 233 (1999)).
  • John T. Soma, David A. Forkner & Brian P. Jumps, The Essential Facilities Doctrine In The Deregulated Telecommunications Industry, 13 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 565 (1998) (citing William B. Tye, Competitive Access: A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).
  • Steven M. Spaeth, The Deregulation Of Transportation And Natural Gas Production In The  United States And Its Relevance To The Soviet Union And Eastern Europe In The 1990's, 12 U. Bridgeport L. Rev. 43 (1991) (citing Shoneman & McConnell, F.E.R.C. Order No. 451: Freedom (Almost) For Old Gas, 7 Energy L.J. 299 (1986); Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Market from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9  Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Steven M. Spaeth, Our Experience Under The Natural Gas Policy Act Of 1978, And Its Relevance To The Natural Gas Wellhead Decontrol Act Of 1989, 12 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 265 (1989/90) (citing Shoneman & McConnell, FERC Order No. 451: Freedom  (Almost) For Old Gas, 7 Energy L.J. 299 (1986); Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Market from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • David B. Spence, Can Law Manage Competitive Energy Markets?, 93 Cornell L. Rev. 765, 817 (2008) (citing Prof. Dr. Thomas von Danwitz, Regulation and Liberalization of the European Electricity Market- A German View, 27 Energy L.J. 423 (2006)).
  • David B. Spence, Federalism, Regulatory Lags, and the Political Economy of Energy Production, 161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 431 (2013) (citing Lynn Kerr McKay et al., Science and the Reasonable Development of Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Resources in Pennsylvania and New York, 32 Energy L.J., 125 (2011)).
  • David Spence, The Politics of Electricity Restructuring: Theory Vs. Practice, 40 Wake Forest L. Rev. 417, 449 (2005) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets To Set Electric Rates? 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003)).
  • David B. Spence & Robert Prentice, The Transformation of American Energy Markets and the Problem of Market Power, 53 B.C. L. Rev. 131 (2012) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets to Set Electric Rates?, 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003); Craig Pirrong, Energy Market Manipulation: Definition, Diagnosis, and Deterrence, 31 Energy L.J. 1 (2010)).
  • 11-SPG L. & Bus. Rev. Am. 185, Global Corporate Governance And Legal Education (2005) (citing Jonathan D. Schneider, The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Fall of Enron , 25 Energy L.J. 441 (2004) (Book Review )).
  • Lawrence J. Spiwak, From International Competitive Carrier To The Wto: A Survey Of The Fcc's International Telecommunications Policy Initiatives 1985-1998, 51 Fed. Comm. L.J. 111 (1998) (citing Lawrence J. Spiwak, Is the Price Squeeze Doctrine Still Viable in Fully-Regulated Energy Markets?, 14 Energy L.J. 75 (1993)).
  • Lawrence J. Spiwak, What Hath Congress Wrought? Reorienting Economic Analysis Of Telecommunications Markets After The 1996 Act, 11-SPG Antitrust 32 (1997) (citing Lawrence J. Spiwak, Is the Price Squeeze Doctrine Still Viable in Fully Regulated Energy Markets?, 14 Energy L.J. 75 (1993)).
  • Daniel F. Spulber & Christopher S. Yoo, Access To Networks: Economic And Constitutional Connections, 88 Cornell L. Rev. 885 (2003) (citing William J. Baumol & J. Gregory Sidak, The Pig in the Python: Is Lumpy Capacity Investment Used and Useful?, 23 Energy L.J. 383 (2002); Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and "Takings", 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989)).
  • Daniel F. Spulber and Christopher S. Yoo, On the Regulation of Networks as Complex Systems: A Graph Theory Approach, 99 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1687, 1713 (2005) (citing William J. Baumol and J. Gregory Sidak, The Pig in the Python: Is Lumpy Capacity Investment Used and Useful, 23 Energy L.J. 383 (2002)).
  • Daniel Spulber and Christopher S. Yoo, Access to Networks: Economic and Constitutional Connections, 88 Cornell L. Rev. 885, 1024 (2003) (citing William J. Baumol and J. Gregory Sidak, The Pig in the Python: Is Lumpy Capacity Investment Used and Useful, 23 Energy L.J. 383 (2002)).
  • Charles Stalon, et. al., Conference, Harvard Electricity Policy Group: Regulatory Decisionmaking Reform, 8 Admin. L.J. Am. U. 789 (1995) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, Retail Wheeling: Is This Revolution Necessary?, 15 Energy L.J. 351 (1994); William Hogan, Markets in Real Electric Network Require Reactive Prices, 14 Energy L.J. 171 (1993); Richard Pierce, The State of the Transition to Competitive Markets in Natural Gas and Electricity, 15 Energy L.J. 323 (1994)).
  • Charles G. Stalon & Reinier H.J.H. Lock, State-Federal Relations In The Economic Regulation Of Energy, 7 Yale J. on Reg. 427 (1990) (citing Vince & Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation in a Post-Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989); Duffy, Will the Supreme Court Lose Patience with Prudence? 9 Energy L.J. 83 (1988); Ercolano & Lesch,  Narragansett Update: From Washington Gas Light to Nantahala, 7 Energy L.J. 333 (1986); Hobelman, From Washington Gas Light to Nantahala, 7 Energy L.J. 333 (1986); Hobelman, The Narragansett Decision and Its Aftermath, 6 Energy L.J. 33 (1985)).
  • Laura R. Starling, Comment, Don't Be Shocked!  Electric Utility Deregulation Can Benefit Low-Cost States  74 Tul. L. Rev. 1519 (2000) (citing Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347 (1995); Clifford S. Sikora, Open  Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 15 Energy L.J. 273(1994)).
  • Logan Starr, The High Court Wades into State-Law Water Allocation, 62 Duke L.J. 1425 (2013) (citing Benjamin K. Sovacool, Running on Empty: The Electricity-Water Nexus and the U.S. Electric Utility Sector, 30 Energy L.J. 11 (2009)
  • Amy L. Stein, The Tipping Point of Federalism, 45 Conn. L. Rev. 217 (2012) (citing Jacob Dweck, David Wochner & Michael Brooks, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Litigation After the Energy Policy Act of 2005: State Powers in LNG Terminal Siting, 27 Energy L.J. 473 (2006); Debbie Swanstrom & Meredith M. Jolivert, DOE Transmission Corridor Designations & FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities?, 30 Energy L.J. 415 (2009)).
  • Gregory M. Stein, Who Gets The Takings Claim? Changes In Land Use Law, Pre-Enactment Owners, And Post-Enactment Buyers, 61 Ohio St. L.J. 89 (2000) (citing Paul Turner & Sam Kalen, Takings and Beyond: Implications for Regulation, 19 Energy L.J. 25 (1998)).
  • Susan E. Stenger, Note, Most-Favored-Nation Clauses And Monopsonistic Power: An Unhealthy Mix?, 15 Am. J.L. & Med. 111  (1989) (citingReport of the Committee on Antitrust, 5 Energy L.J. 149 (1984)).
  • Kurt Stephenson, Symposium, Taking Nature Into Account: Observations About The Changing Role Of Analysis And Negotiation In Hydropower Re-Licensing, 25 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 473 (2000) (citing Melissa Powell, A Case Study for Stakeholders: An Alternative to Traditional Hydroelectric Relicensing, 18 ENERGY L.J. 405 (1997); Michael A. Swiger et al., Paying for the Change: Can the FERC Force Dam Decommissioning at Relicensing?, 17 ENERGY L.J. 164 (1996)).  
  • Michael Evan Stern & Margaret M. Mlynczak Stern, A Critical Overview Of The Economic And Environmental Consequences Of The Deregulation Of The U.S. Electric Power Industry, 4 Envtl. L. 79 (1997) (citing John S. Moot, Electric Utility Mergers: Uncertainty Looms over Regulatory Approvals of the FERC, 12 Energy L.J. 1 (1991); Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419, 426 (1995); Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC's Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).
  • John M. Stevens, Symposium, Antitrust Law And Open Access To The Nren, 38 Vill. L. Rev. 571 (1993) (citing  William B. Tye, Competitive Access:  A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).
  • Michael A. Stosser and Michael G. Andrea, Meeting the Increased Demand for Liquefied Natural Gas , 19-WTR Nat. Resources & Env't 30, 30+ (2005) (citing Gearold L. Knowles, Liquefied Natural Gas: Regulation in a Competitive Natural Gas Market, 24 Energy L.J. 293 (2003)).
  • Mary Katherine Strahan, Connecting Currents: Toward The Integration Of North American Electricity Markets, 21 Hous. J. Int'l L. 291 (1999) (citing  Arturo Gándara, United States-Mexico Electricity Transfers: Of Alien Electrons and the Migration of Undocumented Environmental Burdens, 16 Energy L.J. 1, (1995); An Industry in Transition: Report of the Committee on Electric Utility Regulation, 17 Energy L.J. 245 (1996); Report of the Committee on Independent Power Production, 1995- 1996, 17 Energy L.J. 503 (1996)).
  • Scott Strauss and Jeff Schwarz, The Mobile-Sierra Doctrine: A Return to its Statutory Roots , Vol. 145 No. 5 Pub. Util. Fort. 60 (2007) (citing Hon. Josephy T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, And the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1(2005)).
  • Stephen N. Subrin, Symposium, Federal Rules, Local Rules, And State Rules: Uniformity, Divergence, And Emerging Procedural Patterns, 137 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1999 (1989) (citing Benkin, The Inconstant Lady:  Discovery in Administrative Adjudications and the Evidentiary Use of its Fruits, 4 Energy L.J. 201 (1983)).
  • Indraneel Sur, Jealous Guardians in the Psychedelic Kingdom: Federal Regulation of Electricity Contracts in Bankruptcy, 152 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1697, 1744 (2004) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets To Set Electric Rates? 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003)).
  • Symposium, Breaking The Bottleneck: The Future Of Russia's Oil Pipelines, 7 Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L. 597 (1997) (citing Patricia Fry Eldridge, Russia Energy Legislation: Regulating State Monopolies to Allow the Development of Competitive Markets, 13 Energy L.J. 1 (1992); Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Symposium, A Rational Foreign Policy Toward Haiti And How The Media Shapes Public Perception Of Haiti, 56 U. Miami L. Rev. 405 (2002) (citingThe Rural Electrification Act Preempts State Condemnation Law: City of Morgan City v. South Louisiana Electric Cooperative Association, 16 Energy L.J. 489 (1995)).
  • Deanell Reece Tacha, The Federal Courts In The 21st Century, 2 Chap. L. Rev. 7  (1999) (citing J. Michaels & Arthur S. DeVany, Market-Based Rates for Interstate Gas Pipelines: The Relevant Market and the Real Market, 16 Energy L.J. 299 (1995)).
  • Kim Talus, Access to Gas Markets: A Comparative Study on Access to LNG Terminals in the European Union and the United States, 31 Hous. J. Int'l L. 343 (2009) (citing Monika Ehrman, Competition is a Sin: An Evaluation of the Formation and Effects of a Natural Gas OPEC, 27 Energy L.J. 175 (2006)).
  • Maki Tanaka, Lessons from the Protracted Mox Plant Dispute: A Proposed Protocol on Marine Environmental Impact Assessment to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 25 Mich. J. Int’l. L. 337, 428+ (2004) (citing Scott R. Helton, Comment, The Legal Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal, 23 Energy L.J. 179 (2002)).
  • Dan Tarlock, How Well Can Water Law Adapt to the Potential Stresses of Global Climate Change?, 14 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 1 (2010) (citing Benjamin K. Sovacool, Running on Empty: The Electricity-Water Nexus and the U.S. Electric Utility Sector, 30 Energy L.J. 11 (2009)).
  • Dan Tarlock, Hydro Law and the Future of Hydroelectric Power Generation in the United States, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1723 (2012) (citing David C. Coen & Robert J. Thormeyer, Should Large Hydroelectric Projects Be Treated as Renewable Resources?, 32 Energy L.J. 541 (2011); Mary C. Powell, Treatment of Large Hydropower as a Renewable Resource, 32 Energy L.J. 553 (2011)).
  • A. Dan Tarlock, Takings, Water Rights, and Climate Change, 36 Vt. L. Rev. 731 (2012) (citing Benjamin K. Sovacool, Running on Empty: The Electric-Water Nexus and the U.S. Electric Sector, 30 Energy L.J. 11 (2009)).
  • Dan Tarlock, Water Demand and Energy Production in a Time of Climate Change, 5 Envt'l & Energy L. & Pol'y J. 325 (2010) (citing Benjamin K. Sovacool, Running on Empty: The Electric-Water Nexus and the U.S. Electric Sector, 30 Energy L.J. 11 (2009)).
  • Robert W. Tarun & Peter P. Tomczak, A Proposal for a United States Department of Justice Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Leniency Policy, 47 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 153 (2010) (citing John S. Moot, Compliance Programs, Penalty Mitigation and the FERC, 29 Energy L.J. 547 (2008)).
  • Cory L. Taylor, American Rivers, Inc. v. FERC: Conflict Between FERC Authority Under The Federal Power Act And State Authority Under Section 401 Of The Clean Water Act In The Hydroelectric Licensing Process, 14 J. Nat. Resources & Envtl. L. 169  (1998-99) (citing John D. Echeverria, The Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986, 8 Energy L.J. 61 (1987)).
  • Susan E. Taylor, Energy Emergency Powers in a National Interconnected System, 21 Nat. Res. & Envt. 43 (Summer 2006) (citing Earle H. O’Donnell & Laurel W. Glassman, Energy Emergencies: Constitutional Constraints on State Efforts to Control Oil Supplies and Prices, 5 Energy L.J. 77 (1984)).
  • Stephen L. Teichler & Ilia Levitine, Long-Term Power Purchase Agreements in a Restructured Electricity Industry, 40 Wake Forest L. Rev. 677 (2005) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the “Perfect Storm”, 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001); Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. (1995)).
  • Congressman Lee Terry (NE-2), Keystone Xl: The Pipeline to Energy Security, 46 Creighton L. Rev. 61 (2012) (citing Christopher J. Barr, Unfinished Business: FERC's Evolving Standard for Capacity Rights on Oil Pipelines, 32 Energy L.J. 563 (2011)).
  • David G. Tewksbury and Stephanie S. Lim, Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts, 26 Energy L.J. 437, 472 (2005) (citing Albert A. Foer and Diana L. Moss, Electricity in Transition: Implications For Regulation and Antitrust, 24 Energy L.J. 89 (2003)).
  • David G. Tewksbury, et al., New Chapters in the Mobile-Sierra Story: Application of the Doctrine After NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission, 32 Energy L.J. 433 (2011) (citing John E. McCaffrey, Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1 Revisits the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine: Some Answers, More Questions, 30 Energy L.J. 53 (2009); David G. Tewksbury & Stephanie S. Lim, Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts, 26 Energy L.J. 437 (2005)).
  • David G. Tewksbury and Stephanie S. Lim, Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts , 26 Energy L.J. 437, 472 (2005) (citing Hon. Josephy T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, And the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1(2005)).
  • David G. Tewksbury and Stephanie S. Lim, Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts, 26 Energy L.J. 437, 472 (2005) (citing Michael J. Gergen, George D. Cannon, Jr., and David G. Tewksbury,Market-Based Ratemaking and the Western Energy Crisis of 2000 and 2001, 24 Energy L.J. 321 (2003)).
  • Nidhi Thakar, The Urge to Merge: A Look at the Repeal of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 12 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 903 (2008) (citing Markian M.W. Melnyk & William S. Lamb, PUHCA's Gone: What is Next for Holding Companies?, 27 Energy L.J. 1 (2006))
  • Thirty-Ninth Selected Bibliography on Computers, Technology, and the Law, 33 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 367 (2007) (citing Leslie R. Dubois, Comment, Curiosity and Carbon: Examining the Future of Carbon Sequestration and the Accompanying Jurisdictional Issues as Outlined in the Indian Energy Title of the 2005 Energy Policy Act, 27 Energy L.J. 603 (2006)).
  • Kyla Tienhaara, Foreign Investment Contracts in the Oil & Gas Sector: A Survey of Environmentally Relevant Clauses, 11 Sust. Dev. L. & Pol’y 15 (2011) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Mozelle Thompson, 16 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 609 (2002) Symposium Online Activities & Their Impact on the Legal Profession   Keynote Address: The Federal Trade Commission And Regulating E- Commerce. (citingReport of the Antitrust Committee, 22 Energy L.J. 143, 158  (2001)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain, The Past And Future Of Electricity Regulation, 32 Envtl. L. 435 (2002) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the  "Perfect Storm", 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001); Nicholas W. Fels & Frank R. Lindth, Lessons from the California "Apocalypse": Jurisdiction Over Electric Utilities, 22 Energy L.J. 1 (2001); Jim Rossi, Universal Service in Competitive Retail Electric Power Markets: Whither the Duty to Serve?, 21 Energy L.J. 27, 27 (2000)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain, American Regulatory Policy: Have We Found The "Third Way"?,  48 U. Kan. L. Rev. 829 (2000) (citing Roger Ridlehoover, The Role of Entry in Deregulating Gas and Electricity, 19 Energy L.J. 307 (1998)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain, Symposium, Electricity Restructuring: A Case Study In Government Regulation, 33 Tulsa L.J. 827 (1998) (citing James Barker, Jr., et al., Regulation of Power Pools and System Operators: An International Comparison, 18 Energy L.J. 261 (1997); Hon. Richard D. Cudahy, The FERC’s Policy on Electric Mergers: A Bit of Perspective, 18 Energy L.J. 113 (1997)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain & Sidney A. Shapiro, Analyzing Government Regulation, 49 Admin. L. Rev. 377 (1997) (citing Richard J. Pierce,  Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burner Tip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain, Simple Rules For A Complex World, 36 Jurimetrics J. 409 (1996) (book review) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burner Tip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain, The Dominant Model Of United States Energy Policy, 61 U. Colo. L. Rev. 355 (1990) (citing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988); Griggs, Restructuring the Natural Gas Industry: Order No. 436 and Other Regulatory Initiatives, 7 Energy L.J. 71 (1986)).  
  • Joseph P. Tomain, The Politics of Clean Energy: Moving Beyond the Beltway, 3 San Diego J. Climate & Energy L. 299 (2012) (citing Carolyn Elefant, The “Power” of Social Media: Legal Issues and Best Practices for Utilities Engaging Social Media, 23 Energy L.J. 1 (2011)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain, Symposium, Energy Policy Advice For The New Administration,  46 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 63 (1989) (citing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988); Griggs,  Restructuring the Natural Gas Industry:  Order No. 436 and Other Regulatory Initiatives, 7 Energy L.J. 71 (1986)).  
  • Joseph P. Tomain & Constance Dowd Burton, Nuclear Transition: From Three Mile Island To Chernobyl, 28 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 363 (1987) (citing   Small, FERC Electric Rate Primer, 5 Energy L.J. 107 (1984)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain, Policy, Politics, And Law, 31 UCLA L. Rev. 1247 (1984) (book review) (citing Grenier & Clark, The Relationship Between DOE and FERC: Innovative Government or Inevitable Headache, 1 Energy L.J. 325 (1980); Reed, Selection of Projects for Financial Assistance by the United States Synthetic Fuels  Corporation, 3 Energy L.J. 111 (1982)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain, Smart Energy Path: How Willie Nelson Saved the Planet, 36 Cumb. L. Rev. 417, 459+ (2006) (citing William L. Massey, Robert S. Fleishman, Mary J. Doyle, Reliability Based Competition in Wholesale Electricity: Legal and Policy Perspectives , 25 Energy L.J. 319 (2004)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain, Smart Energy Path: How Willie Nelson Saved the Planet , 36 Cumb. L. Rev. 417, 459 (2006) (citing Monica Berry, Liquefied Natural Gas Import Terminals: Jurisdiction of Siting, Constructing, And Operation in the Context of Commerce Clause Jurisprudence, 26 Energy L.J. 135 (2005)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain, Book Review, Junk Economics Review of Priceless: On Knowing the Price Of Everything and the Value Of Nothing. By Frank Ackerman & Lisa Heinzerling.  W.W. Norton & Co., 93 Geo. L.J. 689 (2005) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the “Perfect Storm”, 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain, "Our Generation's Sputnik Moment": Regulating Energy Innovation, 31 Utah Envtl. L. Rev. 389 (2011) (citing Allison S. Clements & Douglass D. Sims, A Clean Energy Deployment Administration: The Right Policy for Emerging Renewable Technologies, 31 Energy L. J. 397 (2010)).
  • Joseph P. Tomain, "Steel In The Ground": Greening the Grid with the Iutility, 39 Envtl. L. 931 (2009) (citing Mary Ann Ralls, Congress Got It Right: There's No Need to Mandate Renewable Portfolio Standards, 27 Energy L.J. 451 (2006)).
  • Brian S. Tomasovic & Stephen V. Arbogas, Recent Developments in Texas, United States, and International Energy Law, 6 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L 163 (2011) (citing Jeff D. Makholm, Decoupling for Energy Distributors: Changing the 19th Century Tariff Structures to Address 21st Century Energy Markets, 29 Energy L.J. 157 (2008); Mark N. Lowry & Lawrence Kaufmann, Performance-Based Regulation of Utilities, 23 Energy L.J. 399 (2002)).
  • Margaret Tortorella,  Note, Will The Commerce Clause "Pull The Plug" On Minnesota's Quantification Of The Environmental Externalities Of Electricity Production?, 79 Minn. L. Rev. 1547 (1995) (citing Sherry A. Quirk et al., Report of the Committee on Electric Utility Regulation, 14 Energy L.J. 447 (1993)).
  • Sarah McQuillen Tran, Why Have Developers Been Powerless o Develop Ocean Power?, 4 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L. 195 (2009) (citing Brit T. Brown  Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007); Darrell Blakeway & Carol Brotman White, Tapping the Power of Wind: FERC Initiatives to Facilitate Transmission of Wind Power, 26 Energy L.J. 393, 393 (2005)).
  • Hannibal Travis, Wi-Fi Everywhere: Universal Broadband Access as Antitrust and Telecommunications Policy, 55 Am. U. L. Rev. 1697 (2006) (citing James W. Moeller, Electric Utilities and Telecommunications, 16 Energy L.J. 95 (1995)).
  • Elizabeth Trujillo, State Action Antitrust Exemption Collides with Deregulation: Rehabilitating the Foreseeability Doctrine, 11 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 349, 384 (2005) (citing Rohit C. Sharma, Note, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. FERC,23 Energy L.J. 157 (2002)).
  • Evan N. Turgeon, Triple-Dividends: Toward Pigovian Gasoline Taxation, 30 J. Land Resources & Envtl. L. 145 (2010) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • Bentzion S. Turin, Comment, Eastern Philosophy: A Constitutional Argument For Full Stranded Cost Recovery By Deregulated Electric Utilities, 36 Hous. L. Rev. 1411 (1999) (citing Walter R. Hall II, Securitization and Stranded Cost Recovery, 18 Energy L.J. 363 (1997)).
  • Paul Turner, Note, Natural Gas Bypass And The Antitrust Laws In A Brave New (Post Order No. 636) World, 82 Va. L. Rev. 1021 (1996) (citing Paul H. LaRue, Antitrust and the Natural Gas Industry, 11 Energy L.J. 37 (1990)).
  • Sheila R. Tweed, Electric Power Trading Contracts-Smoothing Out A Wild Ride, Practicing Law Institute  PLI Order No. B0-003B  October, 1998    Utility Restructuring: Negotiating, Structuring and Documenting the Deal       Vol. 26, No. 2 (1997), pp. 155-196.   (citing Mark E. Haedicke, Competitive-Based Contracts For the New Power Business, 17 Energy L.J., No. 1 (1996).
  • William B. Tye, The Price Of Inputs Sold To Competitors:  A Response, 11 Yale J. on Reg. 203 (1994) (citing William B. Tye, Competitive Access:  A Comparative Industry Approach to the Essential Facility Doctrine, 8 Energy L.J. 337 (1987)).
  • Ryan Tyz, Energy Maquiladoras: Integrating the Electricity Markets of the United States and Mexico, 6 Or. Rev. Int’l L. 63 (2004) (citing Peter Navarro and Michael Shames, Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned From California 24 Energy L.J. 23 (2003)).
  • 45 U. Miami L. Rev. 1051  University of Miami Law Review  May, 1991    The Citing Of Law Reviews By The United States Courts Of Appeals: An Empirical Analysis    Louis J. Sirico, Jr. [Fn a]  Beth A. Drew [Fn aa]  1  Emory L.J.  21, 1 Energy L.J.  22.  
  • Sandeep Vaheesan, Market Power in Power Markets: The Filed-Rate Doctrine and Competition in Electricity, 46 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 921 (2013) (citing Gerald Norlander, May the FERC Rely on Markets to Set Electric Rates?, 24 Energy L.J. 65 (2003); Joseph T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, and the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1 (2005); Craig R. Roach, Measuring Market Power in the U.S. Electricity Business, 23 Energy L.J. 51 (2002); Diana L. Moss, Electricity and Market Power: Current Issues for Restructuring Markets (A Survey), 1 Envtl. & Energy L. & Pol'y J., 11, 38 (2005); Jon Wellinghoff & David L. Morenoff, Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation, 28 Energy L.J. 389, 401-02 (2007)).
  • Victoria VanBuren, The Colombia-Venezuela Maritime Boundary Case: Proposal for a Joint Development Zone in the Gulf of Venezuela, 1 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L 68 (2006) (citing Jay G. Martin, Venezuela as an Opportunity for Investment in the Petroleum Industry, 20 Energy L.J. 325 (1999)).
  • Caroline Van den Bergh, Reciprocity Clause and International Trade Law, 27 NO. 2 J. Energy & Nat. Resources L. 228 (2009) (citing Yuli Grigoryev, The Russian Gas Industry, Its Legal Structure, and Its Influence on World Markets, 28 Energy L.J. 125 (2007)).
  • Michael P. Vandenbergh & Jim Rossi, Good for You, Bad for Us: The Financial Disincentive for Net Demand Reduction, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1527 (2012) (citing Carolyn Elefant, The “Power” of Social Media: Legal Issues & Best Practices for Utilities Engaging Social Media, 32 Energy L.J. 1 (2011)).
  • Sandeep Vaheesan, Preempting Parochialism and Protectionism in Power, 49 Harv. J. on Legis. 87 (2012) (citing Richard D. Cudahy & William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005); Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007); Clinton A. Vince et al., What Is Happening and Where in the World of RTOs and ISOs?, 27 Energy L.J. 65 (2006); Debbie Swanstrom & Meredith M. Jolivert, DOE Transmission Corridor Designation & FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities?, 30 Energy L.J. 415 (2009); Jon Wellinghoff & David L. Morenoff, Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation, 28 Energy L.J. 389 (2007)).
  • Sandeep Vanheesan, Reviving an Epithet: A New Way Forward for the Essential Facilities Doctrine, 2010 Utah L. Rev. 911 (2010) (citing John S. Moot, Whither Order No. 888?, 26 Energy L.J. 327 (2005)).
  • Allison A. Vana, Attorney Private Eyes: Ethical Implications of a Private Attorney’s Decision to Surreptitiously Record Conversations , 2003 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1605, 1658 (2004) (citing Report of the Ethics Committee, 23 Energy L.J. 533 (2002)).
  • James M. Van Nostrand, Constitutional Limitations on the Ability of States to Rehabilitate Their Failed Electric Utility Restructuring Plans, 31 Seattle U. L. Rev. 593 (2008) (citing Patrick J. McCormick & Sean B. Cunningham, The Requirements of the “Just and Reasonable” Standard: Legal Bases for Reform of Electric Transmission Rates, 21 Energy L. J. 389 (2000)).
  • James M. Van Nostrand, The Standard for Setting Utility Rates in Wyoming: Restoring the Required Balance Between Investors and Customers, 4 Wyo. L. Rev. 245 (2004) (citing Sean B. Cunningham, The Requirements of the “Just and Reasonable” Standard: Legal Bases for Reform of Electric Transmission Rates, 21 Energy L.J. 389, 396 (2000) (citing Frank P. Darr, The Constitutional Limits on Ratemaking: A Response to William Pond, 11 Energy L.J. 53, 63 (1990)).
  • Anthony E. Varona, Toward a Broadband Public Interest Standard, 61 Admin. L. Rev. 1 (2009) (citing Joel A. Youngblood, Note, Alive and Well: The Rural Electrification Act Preempts State Condemnation Law: City of Morgan v. South Louisiana Electric Coop. Ass’n, 16 Energy L.J. 489 (1995)).
  • Kevin J. Vaughan, Note, Russia's Petroleum Industry:  An Overview Of Its Current Status, The Need For Foreign Investment, And Recent Legislation, 25 Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus. 813 (1994) (citing Patricia Fry Eldridge, Russian Energy Legislation: Regulating State Monopolies to Allow the Development of Competitive Markets, Energy L.J., Winter 1992, at 1, 2.
  • Elena P. Vekilov, If It's Broke, Fix It: Federal Regulation of Electrical Interstate Transmission Lines, 2013 U. Ill. L. Rev. 695 (2013) (citing Debbie Swanstrom & Meredith M. Jolivert, DOE Transmission Corridor Designations & FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities?, 30 Energy L.J. 415  (2009); Donald F. Santa, Jr. & Clifford S. Sikora, Open Access and Transition Costs: Will the Electric Industry Transition Track the Natural Gas Industry Restructuring?, 25 Energy L.J. 113  (2004).
  • Kyle Vellutato, Note, Efficiency Gains: An Argument for a Compressed Workweek for New Jersey’s Public Employees, 8 Rutgers J. L. & Pub. Pol’y 840 (2011) (citing Earle H. O’Donnell & Laurel W. Glassman, Energy Emergencies: Constitutional Constraints on State Efforts to Control Oil Supplies and Prices, 5 Energy L.J. 77 (1984)).
  • Barbara A. Vestal, Dueling With Boat Oars, Dragging Through Mooring Lines: Time For More Formal Resolution Of Use Conflicts In States' Coastal Waters?, 4 Ocean & Coastal L.J. 1 (1999) (citing Carolyn Elefant, Ocean Energy Development in the 1990s, 14 Energy L.J. 335 (1993)).
  • Clifford J. Villa, Law and Lawyers in the Incident Command System, 36 Seattle U. L. Rev. 1855 (2013) (citing John Wyeth Griggs, BP Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill, 32 Energy L.J. 57 (2011)).
  • Clinton A. Vince & John S. Moot, 42 Admin. L. Rev. 323 (1990) (citing Vince & Moot, Federal Preemption Versus State Utility Regulation in a Post-Mississippi Era, 10 Energy L.J. 1 (1989); Goldsmith, Utility Rates and "Takings,"' 10 Energy L.J. 241 (1989)).
  • Clinton A. Vince, Sherry A. Quirk, Stanley P. Wolf, Travis R. Smith, Sandra Barbulescu, and Monica Berry, What is Happening and Where in the World of RTOS and ISOS?, 27 Energy L.J. 65, 145 (2006) (citing William L. Massey, Robert S. Fleishman, Mary J. Doyle, Reliability Based Competition in Wholesale Electricity: Legal and Policy Prospectives , 25 Energy L.J. 319 (2004)).
  • Clinton A. Vince, Sherry A. Quirk, Stanley P. Wolf, Travis R. Smith, Sandra Barbulescu, and Monica Berry, What is Happening and Where in the World of RTOs and ISOs ? , 27 Energy L.J. 65, 145 (2006) (citing Hon. Josephy T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, And the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1(2005)).
  • Clinton A. Vince, Sherry A. Quirk, Stanley P. Wolf, Travis R. Smith, Sandra Barbulescu, and Monica Berry, What is Happening and Where in the World of RTOs and ISOs?, 27 Energy L.J. 65, 145 (2006) (citing Report of the Electric Utility Regulation Committee, 26 Energy L.J. 217 (2005)).
  • Clinton A. Vince, Sherry A. Quirk, Stanley P. Wolf, Travis R. Smith, Sandra Barbulescu, and Monica Berry, What is Happening and Where in the World of RTOS and ISOS?, 27 Energy L.J. 65, 145+ (2006) (citing Hon. Suedeen Kelly and Maria F. Vouras and Jennifer S. Amerkhail, The Subdelegation Doctrine and the Application of Reference Prices in Mitigating Market Power, 26 Energy L.J. 297 (2005)).
  • William Vincent , Hydrogen and Tort Law: Liability Concerns are Not a Bar to a Hydrogen Economy, 25 Energy L.J. 385, 401+ (2004) (citing Russell Moy, Tort Law Considerations for the Hydrogen Economy, 24 Energy L.J. 349 (2003) ).
  • Alexandra E. Viscusi, Note, Conflicting Directives: Water Quality And Appropriative Water Rights In The West,  20 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 121 (1995) (citing D. Horton, Note, State Control over the Destiny of Hydropower Development: PUD No. 1 v. Washington Department of Ecology, 15 Energy L.J. 463 (1994)).
  • Prof. Dr. Thomas von Danwitz, Regulation and Liberalization of the European Electricity Market - A German View, 27 Energy L.J. 423 (2006) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the “Perfect Storm”, 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001)).
  • Thomas W. Waelde & George Ndi, Stabilizing International Investment Commitments: International Law Versus Contract Interpretation, 31 Tex. Int'l L.J. 215 (1996) (citing Thomas W. Waelde, International Petroleum Investment: Regulation and Contracts, Energy L.J. (forthcoming 1996);
  • Matthew Waldron, Exploring Failed Electricity Deregulation: Lawyers’ Role in Supporting a Healthy Marketplace, 19 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 1005, 1025 (2006) (citing Peter Navarro and Michael Shames, Electricity Deregulation: Lessons Learned From California, 24 Energy L.J. 23 (2003)).
  • Matthew Waldron, Exploring Failed Electricity Deregulation: Lawyers' Role in Supporting a Healthy Marketplace, 19 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 1005, 1025+ (2006) (citing Hon. Josephy T. Kelliher, Market Manipulation, Market Power, And the Authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 26 Energy L.J. 1(2005)).
  • Stephanie Walter Gillette, Note, Nuclear Energy Crisis In The Former Soviet Union:  Will The Nuclear Energy Protocol Of The European Energy Charter Provide The Necessary Solutions?, 5 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev. 375 (1993) (citing Patricia Fry Eldridge, Russian Energy Legislation:  Regulating State Monopolies to Allow the Development of Competitive Markets, 13 Energy L.J. 1 (1992)).  
  • Christel Walther, LLC and Lawyers: A Good Combination? , 50 Loy. L. Rev. 359, 361 (2004) (citing Report of the Ethics Committee, 23 Energy L.J. 533 (2002)).
  • Kevin M. Walsh, Renewable Energy Financial Incentives: Focusing on Federal Tax Credits and the Section 1603 Cash Grant: Barriers to Development, 36 Environs Envtl. L. & Pol'y J.  207 (2013) (citing Margaret Caffey-Moquin et al., Committee Reports: Report of the Renewable Energy Committee, 32 Energy L.J. 405 (2011)).
  • Joseph J. Ward, Comment, Corporate Goliaths In The Costume Of David: The Question Of Association Aggregation Under The Equal Access To Justice Act-Should The Whole Be Greater Than Its Parts? 26 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 151 (1998) (citing J. Steele, Note, Liability for Attorneys' Fees Under The Equal Access to Justice Act-Raton Gas Transmission Co. v. FERC, 11 Energy L.J. 297 (1990)).
  • Robert L. Waring, Comment, Talk Is Not Cheap:  Funded Student Speech At Public Universities On Trial, 29 U.S.F. L. Rev. 541 (1995) (citing R. Paul Gee, Note, Who Pays for Charitable Contributions Made by Utility Companies?, 12 Energy L.J. 363 (1991)).
  • Lawrence G. Wasden & Brian Kane, Massachusetts v. EPA: A Strategic and Jurisdictional Recipe for State Attorneys General in the Context of Emission Accelerated Global Warming Solutions, 44 Idaho L. Rev. 703 (2008) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007)).
  • Claire A. Watkins, Comment, Nuclear Power Rate Regulation After Eastern Enterprises: Are Ratepayers Being Taken For A Ride? , 28 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 191 (2000) (citing Richard Goldsmith, Utility Rates and Takings, 10 ENERGY L.J. 241, 241 (1989)).
  • Daniel Watkiss, Deregulatory Myopia: Sacrificing The Filed Rate Doctrine And Rule Against Retroactive Ratemaking To Promote Competition In Gas Markets,  42 Sw. L.J. 711 (1988) (citing Pierce, Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988); Contractual Liability of Pipelines for Damages Caused by Gas Supply Curtailments: Texasgulf, Inc. v. United Gas Pipeline Co., 6 Energy L.J. 281 (1985); Nowak & Leitch, Maryland People's Counsel: Will It Spur Changes in FERC's Regulation of the Natural Gas Industry?, 6 Energy L.J. 265 (1985)).
  • Jeffrey D. Watkiss & Douglas W. Smith, The Energy Policy Act Of 1992--A Watershed For Competition In The Wholesale Power Market, 10 Yale J. on Reg. 447 (1993) (citing F. Norton & M. Early, Limitations on the Obligations to Provide Access to Electric Transmission and Distribution Lines, 5 Energy L.J. 47 (1984); I.D. Benkin, Who Makes the Rules? Federal and State Jurisdiction over Electric Transmission Access, 13 Energy L.J. 45 (1991)).
  • Jacqueline Lang Weaver, Symposium, The History And Organization OfRussian Petroleum Legislation Project At The University Of Houston Law Center, 15 Hous. J. Int'l L. 271 (1993) (citing Patricia Fry Eldridge, Russian Energy Legislation: Regulating State Monopolies to Allow the Development of Competitive Markets, 13 Energy L.J. 1 (1992)).
  • Jacqueline Lang Weaver, Can Energy Markets Be Trusted? The Effect of the Rise and Fall of Enron on Energy Markets, 4 Hous. Bus. & Tax L.J. 1, 94 (2004) (citing Peter Fox-Penner, Gary Taylor, Romkaew Broehm, and James Bohn, Competition in Wholesale Electric Power Markets, 23 Energy L.J. 281 (2002)).
  • Jacqueline Lang Weaver, Can Energy Markets Be Trusted? The Effect of the Rise and Fall of Enron on Energy Markets, 4 Hous. Bus. & Tax. L.J. 1 (2004) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the ‘Perfect Storm,’ 22 Energy L. J. 65 (2001)).
  • Ann Brewster Weeks, Symposium, Advising Nature: Can We Get Clean Air From The Old Dirties?,  33 New Eng. L. Rev. 707 (1999) (citing Douglas O. Waikart, Report of the Committee on the Environment, 19 Energy L.J. 181 (1998)).
  • Jeremy D. Weinstein, Practical Considerations Regarding Electricity and Its Regulation when Using the ISDA/EEI Power Annex, 26 Futures & Derivatives Law Report 3 (2006) (citing Katz, Using the EEI-NEM Master Contract to Manage Power Marketing Risks, 21 Energy L.J. 269 (2000)).
  • Michael S. Weldon, Jr., Bad Neighbors and A Luckless Landlord: How the Clean Air Act Doomed the Environmental Protection Agency, 64 Mercer L. Rev. 1077 (2013) (citing Report of the Environmental Regulation Committee, 32 Energy L.J. 637, 646 (2011)).
  • Hon. Jon Wellinghoff, David L. Morenoff, James Pederson, and Mary Elizabeth Tighe, Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation , 28 Energy L.J. 389, 419 (2007) (citing William L. Massey, Robert S. Fleishman, Mary J. Doyle, Reliability Based Competition in Wholesale Electricity: Legal and Policy Perspectives , 25 Energy L.J. 319 (2004)).
  • Shelley Welton, From the States Up: Building a National Renewable Energy Policy, 17 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 987 (2008) (citing Mary Ann Ralls, Congress Got it Right: There's No Need to Mandate Renewable Portfolio Standards, 27 Energy L.J. 451 (2006)).
  • Gregory J. Werden, The Law And Economics Of The Essential Facility Doctrine, 32 St. Louis U. L.J. 433 (1987) (citing Pace & Landon, Introducing Competition into the Electric Utility Industry:  An Economic Analysis, 3 Energy L.J. 1 (1982)).
  • Theodore W. Wern, Note, Judicial Deference To Eeoc Interpretations Of The Civil Rights Act, The Ada, And The Adea: Is The Eeoc A Second Class Agency?, 60 Ohio St. L.J. 1533 (1999) (citing Jerome Nelson, The Chevron Deference Rule and Judicial Review of FERC Orders, 9 Energy L.J. 59 (1988)).
  • Heidi Werntz, Let's Make a Deal: Negotiated Rates for Merchant Transmission, 28 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 421 (2011) (citing Debbie Swanstrom & Meredith M. Jolivert, DOE Transmission Corridor Designations and FERC Backstop Siting Authority: Has the Energy Policy Act of 2005 Succeeded in Stimulating the Development of New Transmission Facilities?, 30 Energy L.J. 415 (2009); Hon. Jon Wellinghoff & David Morenoff, Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation, 28 Energy L.J. 389 (2007)).
  • John A. Wetenkamp, Chapter 12: Expedited Power Plant Siting as Response to Power Crisis, 33 McGeorge L. Rev. 414 (2002) (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the “Perfect Storm,” 22 Energy L.J. 65 (2001)).
  • John A. Wetenkamp, 33 McGeorge L. Rev. 414 (2002) Review of Selected 2001 California Legislation  Chapter 12: Expedited Power Plant Siting As Response To Power Crisis (citing Michael A. Yuffee, California's Electricity Crisis: How Best to Respond to the "Perfect Storm," 22 ENERGY L.J. 65 (2001)).
  • James J. White & David A. Peters, Essay, A Footnote For Jack Dawson, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 1954  (2002) (citing J. David Hughes, Indefinite Escalators: 1985 Does FERC Have a 'Stairway' Down?, 4 Energy L.J. 189 (1983); Stimpert, Note, Lenape Resources Corporation v.  Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company: Natural Gas Take-Or-Pay Contracts Under The Uniform Commercial Code, 18 Energy L.J. 421 (1997)).
  • John M. White, The Federal Power Act's Double Standard: Unwinding the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine After Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1, 61 Am. U. L. Rev. 677 (2012) (citing Patrick J. McCormick III & Sean B. Cunningham, The Requirements of the “Just and Reasonable Standard”: Legal Bases for Reform of Electric Transmission Rates, 21 Energy L.J. 389 (2000); Patrick J. McCormick III & Sean B. Cunningham, The Requirements of the “Just and Reasonable Standard”: Legal Bases for Reform of Electric Transmission Rates, 21 Energy L.J. 389 (2000); David G. Tewksbury & Stephanie S. Lim, Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts, 26 Energy L.J. 437 (2005); John E. McCaffrey, Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1 Revisits the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine: Some Answers, More Questions, 30 Energy L.J. 53 (2009); Carmen L. Gentile, The Mobile-Sierra Rule: Its Illustrious Past and Uncertain Future, 21 Energy L.J. 353 (2000); Jeffrey McIntyre Gray, Reconciling Market-Based Rates with the Just and Reasonable Standard, 26 Energy L.J. 423 (2005)).
  • Teal Jordan White, Clean Air Act Mayhem: EPA’s Tailoring Rule Stitches Greenhouse Gas Emissions into the Wrong Regulatory Fitting, 18 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 407 (2011) (citing John C. Dernbach & Seema Kakade, Climate Change Law: An Introduction, 29 Energy L.J. 1 (2008)).
  • Janie Hauser, From Sleeping Giant to Friendly Giant: Rethinking the United States Solar Energy Trade War with China, 38 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 1061 (2013) (citing Allison S. Clements & Douglass D. Sims, A Clean Energy Deployment Administration: The Right Policy for Emerging Renewable Technologies, 31 Energy L.J. 397 (2010)).
  • Lucy Wiggins, Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1 Revisits the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine: Some Answers, More Questions, 30 Energy L.J. 53 (2009) (citing  Daniel G. Tewksbury & Stephanie S. Lim, Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts, 26 Energy L. J. 437 (2005)).
  • Lucy Wiggins, The Ninth Circuit Confronts the Aftermath of the Western Energy Crisis, 7 Sustainable Dev. L. & Pol'y 63, 64+ (2007)(citing Jeffrey McIntyre Gray, Reconciling Market-Based Rates with the Just and Reasonable Standard, 26 Energy L.J. 423 (2005)).
  • Lucy Wiggins, The Ninth Circuit Confronts the Aftermath of the Western Energy Crisis , 7 Sustainable Dev. L. & Pol'y 63, 64 (2007) (citing David G. Tewksbury and Stephanie S. Lim, Applying the Mobile-Sierra Doctrine to Market-Based Rate Contracts, 26 Energy L.J. 437 (2005)).
  • Cynthia A. Williams, Icarus On Steroids, 94 Geo. L.J. 1197, 1227 (2006) (citing Hon. Richard D. Cudahy and William D. Henderson, From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise And Fall of Two Energy Icons, 26 Energy L.J. 35 (2005)).
  • Laura D. Windsor, Amoco Production Company V. Southern Ute Indian Tribe: A Final Resolution To The Battle Over Ownership Of Coalbed Methane Gas?, 17 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 893 (2001) (citing Stacy L. Leeds, Note, Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Company: Judicial Construction of Coalbed Methane Gas Ownership, 17 Energy L.J. 489 (1996)).  
  • Peter Winship, Symposium, Energy Contracts And The United Nations Sales Convention, 25 Tex. Int'l L.J. 365 (1990) (citingReport of the [A.B.A.] Committee on International Energy Transactions, 8 Energy L.J. 147 (1987)).
  • Hannah Wiseman, Expanding Regional Renewable Governance, 35 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 477 (2011) (citing Clinton A. Vince et al., What is Happening and Where in the World of RTOs and ISOs?, 27 Energy L.J. 65 (2006)).
  • Hannah J. Wiseman, Dynamic Energy Federalism, 72 Md. L. Rev. 773 (2013) (citing Danielle Changala & Paul Foley, The Legal Regime of Widespread Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle Adoption: A Vermont Case Study, 32 Energy L.J. 99 (2011); Jonathan A. Lesser, The Used and Useful Test: Implications for a Restructured Electric Industry, 23 Energy L.J. 349 (2002)).
  • Hannah Wiseman, Untested Waters: The Rise of Hydraulic Fracturing in Oil and Gas Production and the Need to Revisit Regulation, 20 Fordham Envtl L. Rev. 115 (2009) (citing United States Senator James M. Inhofe & Frank Fannon, Energy and the Environment: The Future of Natural Gas in America, 26 Energy L.J. 349 (2005)).
  • Diane P. Wood, Theory and Practice in Antitrust Law: Judge Cudahy's Example, 29 Yale J. on Reg. 403 (2012) (citing Richard D. Cudahy, 70th Anniversary of the Federal Power Act, 26 Energy L.J. 389 (2005); Richard D. Cudahy, Full Circle in the Formerly Regulated Industries?, 33 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 767 (2002); Richard D. Cudahy, PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy, 16 Energy L.J. 419 (1995); Richard D. Cudahy, The Bell Tolls for Hydrocarbons: What's Next?, 29 Energy L.J. 381 (2008)).
  • Tyler R.T. Wolf, Existing in a Legal Limbo: The Precarious Legal Position of Standards-Development Organizations, 65 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 807, 849 (2008) (citing William P. Boswell and James P. Cargas, North American Energy Standards Board: Legal and Administrative Underpinnings of a Consensus Based Organization, 27 Energy L.J. 147 (2006)).
  • Alice Woolley, Legitimating Public Policy, 58 University of Toronto Law Journal 153 (2008) (citing John S. Moot, Economic Theories of Regulation and Electricity Restructuring, 25 Energy L.J. 273 (2004)).
  • Arthur J. Wright & Carla J. Sharpe, Direct Gas Sales:  Royalty Problems For The Producer,  46 Okla. L. Rev. 235 (1993) (citing Robert C. Means & Robert S. Angyal, The Regulation and Future Role of Direct Producer Sales, 5 Energy L.J. 1 (1984); Mark E. Haedicke, Contracts for the New Natural Gas Business, 13 Energy L.J. 313 (1992)).  
  • Jennifer Yelin-Kefer, Note, Warming Up To An International Greenhouse Gas Market: Lessons From The U.S. Acid Rain Experience 20 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 221 (2001) (citing Robert R. Nordhaus, Acid Rain Compliance: Coordination of State and Federal Regulation, 13 Energy L.J. 341(1992).
  • Christopher S. Yoo, Beyond Coase: Emerging Technologies and Property Theory, 160 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2189 (2012) (citing Seth Blumsack, Measuring the Benefits and Costs of Regional Electric Grid Integration, 28 Energy L.J. 147 (2007); Ray S. Bolze et al., Antitrust Law Regulation: A New Focus for a Competitive Energy Industry, 21 Energy L.J. 79 (2000)).
  • Miles Young, Beautifying the Ugly Step-Sister: Designing an Effective Cap-and-Trade Program to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 2009 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 1379, (2009) (citing Bill Westerfield et al., EBA Climate Change Primer: Cap and Trade, 29 Energy L.J. 173 (2008)).
  • Elizabeth M. Youngdale, Reviewing the Law Reviews, 71 D ef. C ouns. J. 429 (2004) (citing Nicholas W. Fells, Beyond the Stopwatch: Determining Appellate Venue on Review of FERC Orders, 25 Energy L.J. 1 (2004)).
  • Elizabeth M. Youngdale, Reviewing the Law Reviews , 71 Def. Couns. J. 429, 433 (2004) (citing Nicholas W. Fels, Beyond the Stopwatch: Determining Appellate Venue on Review of FERC Orders, 25 Energy L.J. 1 (2004)).
  • Elizabeth M. Youngdale, Reviewing the Law Reviews, 69 Def. Couns. J. 539, 543 (2002) (citing Richard J. Pierce, Jr.,Regional Transmission Organizations: Federal Limitations Needed for Tort Liability, 23 Energy L.J. 63 (2002)).
  • Elizabeth M. Youngdale, Reviewing the Law Reviews, 69 Def. Couns. J. 539 (2002).
  • Mark R. Yzaguirre, Project Finance And Privatization: The Bolivian Example, 20 Hous. J. Int'l L. 597 (1998) (citing Thomas Waelde, International Energy Investment, 17 Energy L.J. 191 (1996)).
  • Susan Zachos, Comment, Gas Purchase Contracts:  Equitable Remedies For Breach, 24 Hous. L. Rev. 991 (1987) (citing Hughes, Indefinite Escalators:  1985 Does FERC Have c 'Stairway' Down?, 4 Energy L.J. 189 (1983); Coburn, The Case for Petroleum Pipeline Deregulation, 3 Energy L.J. 225 (1982);  Contractual Liability of Pipelines for Damages Caused by Gas Supply Curtailments: Texasgulf, Inc. v. United Gas Pipeline Co., 6 Energy L.J. 281 (1985)).  
  • James Robert Zadick, The Public Pore Space: Enabling Carbon Capture and Sequestration by Reconceptualizing Subsurface Property Rights, 36 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 257 (2011) (citing Philip M. Marston & Patricia A. Moore, From EOR to COS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage, 29 Energy L.J. 421 (2008); Jeffrey W. Moore, The Potential Law of On-Shore Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants, 28 Energy L. J. 443 (2007)).
  • Alexandra J. Zaltman, Obstructions and Opportunities in the Complex World of Massachusetts Onshore Wind Power Development, 13 J. High Tech. L. 215 (2012) (citing Brit T. Brown & Benjamin A. Escobar, Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Lawsuits, 28 Energy L.J. 489 (2007); Committee Report: Report of the Renewable Energy and Demand-Side Management Committee, 30 Energy L.J. 273 (2009)).
  • Sandra Zellmer, Treading Water While Congress Ignores the Nation's Environment, 88 Notre Dame L. Rev. 2323 (2013) (citing Cameron Jefferies, Unconventional Bridges over Troubled Water-- Lessons to Be Learned from the Canadian Oil Sands as the United States Moves to Develop the Natural Gas of the Marcellus Shale Play, 33 Energy L.J. 75, 105-06 (2012)).
  • Alexandros Zervos, Linking Natural Resource Exploitation and Primary Health Care in Developing Countries, 11 UCLA J. Int'l L. & Foreign Aff. 227 (2006) (citing Eric Marcks, Avoiding Liability for Human Rights Violations in Project Finance, 22 Energy L.J. 301 (2001)).
  • Nan Zhang, Note, Moving Towards A Competitive Electricity Market? The Dilemma Of Project  Finance In The Wake Of The Asian Financial Crisis, 9 Minn. J. Global Trade 715 (2000) (citing Mark E. Haedicke, Competitive-Based Contracts for the New Power Business, 17 Energy L.J. 103 (1996); Peter Navarro, A Guidebook and Research Agenda for Restructuring the Electricity Industry, 16 Energy L.J. 347, 381 (1995); Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconstituting the Natural Gas Industry from Wellhead to Burnertip, 9 Energy L.J. 1 (1988)).
  • Zimmermann Scott A. Zimmermann, Feds and Fossils: Meaningful State Participation in the Development of Liquefied Natural Gas , 33 Ecology L.Q. 789, 824 (2006) (citing Monica Berry, Liquefied Natural Gas Import Terminals: Jurisdiction of Siting, Constructing, And Operation in the Context of Commerce Clause Jurisprudence, 26 Energy L.J. 135 (2005))